Pandemic risk characterisation of zoonotic influenza A viruses using the Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA).

IF 20.9 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Reina Yamaji, Wenqing Zhang, Akiko Kamata, Cornelia Adlhoch, David E Swayne, Dmitriy Pereyaslov, Dayan Wang, Gabriele Neumann, Gounalan Pavade, Ian G Barr, Malik Peiris, Richard J Webby, Ron A M Fouchier, Sophie Von Dobschütz, Thomas Fabrizio, Yuelong Shu, Magdi Samaan
{"title":"Pandemic risk characterisation of zoonotic influenza A viruses using the Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA).","authors":"Reina Yamaji, Wenqing Zhang, Akiko Kamata, Cornelia Adlhoch, David E Swayne, Dmitriy Pereyaslov, Dayan Wang, Gabriele Neumann, Gounalan Pavade, Ian G Barr, Malik Peiris, Richard J Webby, Ron A M Fouchier, Sophie Von Dobschütz, Thomas Fabrizio, Yuelong Shu, Magdi Samaan","doi":"10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic risk assessment approach is essential for evaluating the relative risk of influenza A viruses (IAVs) with pandemic potential. To achieve this, the Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA) was developed under the Global Influenza Programme of WHO. Since its release in 2016 and update in 2020, TIPRA has been used to assess the pandemic risk of 11 zoonotic IAVs across ten evaluation rounds. Notably, A(H7N9), A(H9N2), and A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4 viruses were re-evaluated owing to changes in epidemiological characteristics or virus properties. A(H7N9) viruses had the highest relative risk at the time of assessment, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring and reassessment as changes in epidemiological trends within animal and human populations can alter risk profiles. The knowledge gaps identified throughout the ten risk assessments should help to guide the efficient use of resources for future research, including surveillance. The TIPRA tool reflects the One Health approach and has proven crucial for closely monitoring virus dynamics in both human and non-human populations to enhance preparedness for potential IAV pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic risk assessment approach is essential for evaluating the relative risk of influenza A viruses (IAVs) with pandemic potential. To achieve this, the Tool for Influenza Pandemic Risk Assessment (TIPRA) was developed under the Global Influenza Programme of WHO. Since its release in 2016 and update in 2020, TIPRA has been used to assess the pandemic risk of 11 zoonotic IAVs across ten evaluation rounds. Notably, A(H7N9), A(H9N2), and A(H5) clade 2.3.4.4 viruses were re-evaluated owing to changes in epidemiological characteristics or virus properties. A(H7N9) viruses had the highest relative risk at the time of assessment, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring and reassessment as changes in epidemiological trends within animal and human populations can alter risk profiles. The knowledge gaps identified throughout the ten risk assessments should help to guide the efficient use of resources for future research, including surveillance. The TIPRA tool reflects the One Health approach and has proven crucial for closely monitoring virus dynamics in both human and non-human populations to enhance preparedness for potential IAV pandemics.

利用流感大流行风险评估工具(TIPRA)确定人畜共患病甲型流感病毒的大流行风险特征。
系统的风险评估方法对于评估具有大流行潜力的甲型流感病毒的相对风险至关重要。为此,世卫组织全球流感计划开发了流感大流行风险评估工具(TIPRA)。自 2016 年发布和 2020 年更新以来,TIPRA 已在十轮评估中用于评估 11 种人畜共患病 IAV 的大流行风险。值得注意的是,A(H7N9)、A(H9N2)和 A(H5) 2.3.4.4 支系病毒因流行病学特征或病毒特性发生变化而被重新评估。在评估时,A(H7N9)病毒的相对风险最高,这凸显了持续监测和重新评估的重要性,因为动物和人类群体中流行病趋势的变化会改变风险概况。在十项风险评估中发现的知识差距应有助于指导今后研究(包括监测)资源的有效利用。TIPRA 工具反映了 "一体健康 "方法,并已证明对密切监测人类和非人类群体中的病毒动态至关重要,有助于加强对潜在 IAV 大流行的防备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信