What are the research priorities in dance for dementia? A co-created agenda to support equitable research.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katey Warran, Pilar Letrondo, Martin Robertson, Lisa Sinclair, Emma Smith, Emili Åström, Emily Davis, Bethany Whiteside, Heather Wilkinson
{"title":"What are the research priorities in dance for dementia? A co-created agenda to support equitable research.","authors":"Katey Warran, Pilar Letrondo, Martin Robertson, Lisa Sinclair, Emma Smith, Emili Åström, Emily Davis, Bethany Whiteside, Heather Wilkinson","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2024.2408023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a gap in the field of dance for dementia regarding how to engage in and improve equitable, moral, and rights-based ways of working with those with lived experience to co-design research priorities. We set out to create a collaborative research agenda for this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of collaborative activities were conducted, including an in-person workshop (<i>n</i> = 59 people), online workshop (<i>n</i> = 23 people), digital communications, podcasts, and co-writing, including with people living with dementia (PLWD), health and social care professionals, artists, arts organisational representatives, and academic researchers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were constructed: 1) Improving access to dance participation; 2) Prioritising co-produced approaches; and 3) Enabling innovation in measurement and methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first co-produced agenda for the field of dance for dementia. Underpinned by diverse perspectives and lived experience, it outlines themes and associated research questions that can be used in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2024.2408023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a gap in the field of dance for dementia regarding how to engage in and improve equitable, moral, and rights-based ways of working with those with lived experience to co-design research priorities. We set out to create a collaborative research agenda for this field.

Methods: A series of collaborative activities were conducted, including an in-person workshop (n = 59 people), online workshop (n = 23 people), digital communications, podcasts, and co-writing, including with people living with dementia (PLWD), health and social care professionals, artists, arts organisational representatives, and academic researchers.

Results: Three key themes were constructed: 1) Improving access to dance participation; 2) Prioritising co-produced approaches; and 3) Enabling innovation in measurement and methods.

Conclusion: This is the first co-produced agenda for the field of dance for dementia. Underpinned by diverse perspectives and lived experience, it outlines themes and associated research questions that can be used in future research.

痴呆症舞蹈研究的重点是什么?支持公平研究的共建议程。
背景:在痴呆症舞蹈领域,如何与那些有生活经验的人共同设计研究重点,并参与和改进以公平、道德和权利为基础的工作方式,是一个空白。我们着手为这一领域制定合作研究议程:我们开展了一系列合作活动,包括面对面研讨会(n = 59 人)、在线研讨会(n = 23 人)、数字通信、播客和共同写作,其中包括痴呆症患者(PLWD)、医疗和社会护理专业人员、艺术家、艺术组织代表和学术研究人员:结果:构建了三个关键主题:1)改善舞蹈参与的机会;2)优先考虑共同制作的方法;3)促进测量和方法的创新:这是为痴呆症舞蹈领域共同制定的第一份议程。它以不同的观点和生活经验为基础,概述了可用于未来研究的主题和相关研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信