Application and implications of radiocarbon dating in forensic case work: when medico-legal significance meets archaeological relevance.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Forensic Sciences Research Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/fsr/owae046
Benoit Bertrand, Thibault Clauzel, Pascale Richardin, Anne Bécart, Philippe Morbidelli, Valery Hédouin, Carina Marques
{"title":"Application and implications of radiocarbon dating in forensic case work: when medico-legal significance meets archaeological relevance.","authors":"Benoit Bertrand, Thibault Clauzel, Pascale Richardin, Anne Bécart, Philippe Morbidelli, Valery Hédouin, Carina Marques","doi":"10.1093/fsr/owae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The estimation of the postmortem interval for skeletal remains is a crucial aspect of forensic anthropology. This paper illustrates the importance of radiocarbon analysis for establishing medico-legal significance and supporting forensic identification, through the analysis of three case studies for which the years of both birth and death were investigated. In Audresselles, Northern France, a partial skull was discovered with no contextual information or identity. Radiocarbon dating yielded an average calibrated calendar age of 4232 BCE (92.5% probability), indicating significant archaeological value but no forensic relevance. In the second case, skeletal remains were found in the flooded underground of a historical fort at Wimereux, Northern France, also with no identity. Radiocarbon dating based on the bomb-pulse curve indicated a calibrated date of death in 1962 CE (37.3% probability) or 1974-1975 CE (58.1% probability), both surpassing the French statute of limitations. Lastly, a skeleton with a suspected identity was discovered near Valenciennes, Northern France, and various biological tissues underwent radiocarbon dating. A bone sample suggested a calibrated date of death of 1998-2002 CE (84.6% probability), differing from a hair sample (2013-2018 CE, 83.3% probability) because of the slower bone tissue remodeling process. DNA analysis confirmed the person's identity, reported missing a decade prior to the discovery of the remains, following the alignment of the radiocarbon results with the individual's year of birth based on dental tissues and year of death. These case studies reveal that traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools for estimating the postmortem interval, providing mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools to establish the archaeological relevance or medico-legal significance of human skeletal remains.Bomb-pulse dating enables assessment of an individual's years of birth and death.Bomb-pulse dating helps to narrow down the pool of candidates for identification.Radiocarbon analysis provides mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.</p>","PeriodicalId":45852,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Sciences Research","volume":"9 3","pages":"owae046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owae046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of the postmortem interval for skeletal remains is a crucial aspect of forensic anthropology. This paper illustrates the importance of radiocarbon analysis for establishing medico-legal significance and supporting forensic identification, through the analysis of three case studies for which the years of both birth and death were investigated. In Audresselles, Northern France, a partial skull was discovered with no contextual information or identity. Radiocarbon dating yielded an average calibrated calendar age of 4232 BCE (92.5% probability), indicating significant archaeological value but no forensic relevance. In the second case, skeletal remains were found in the flooded underground of a historical fort at Wimereux, Northern France, also with no identity. Radiocarbon dating based on the bomb-pulse curve indicated a calibrated date of death in 1962 CE (37.3% probability) or 1974-1975 CE (58.1% probability), both surpassing the French statute of limitations. Lastly, a skeleton with a suspected identity was discovered near Valenciennes, Northern France, and various biological tissues underwent radiocarbon dating. A bone sample suggested a calibrated date of death of 1998-2002 CE (84.6% probability), differing from a hair sample (2013-2018 CE, 83.3% probability) because of the slower bone tissue remodeling process. DNA analysis confirmed the person's identity, reported missing a decade prior to the discovery of the remains, following the alignment of the radiocarbon results with the individual's year of birth based on dental tissues and year of death. These case studies reveal that traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools for estimating the postmortem interval, providing mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.

Key points: Traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools to establish the archaeological relevance or medico-legal significance of human skeletal remains.Bomb-pulse dating enables assessment of an individual's years of birth and death.Bomb-pulse dating helps to narrow down the pool of candidates for identification.Radiocarbon analysis provides mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.

放射性碳年代测定在法医案件工作中的应用和影响:当医学法律意义与考古学相关性相遇时。
估算骨骼遗骸的死后时间间隔是法医人类学的一个重要方面。本文通过分析三个调查了出生和死亡年份的案例研究,说明了放射性碳分析在确定医学法律意义和支持法医鉴定方面的重要性。在法国北部的 Audresselles,发现了一个没有背景信息或身份信息的部分头骨。放射性碳测年得出的平均校准日历年龄为公元前 4232 年(概率为 92.5%),这表明它具有重要的考古价值,但与法医学无关。在第二个案例中,在法国北部维梅勒(Wimereux)一座历史古堡被洪水淹没的地下发现了一具骸骨,也没有任何身份信息。根据炸弹脉冲曲线进行的放射性碳测年表明,标定的死亡日期为西元 1962 年(概率为 37.3%)或西元 1974-1975 年(概率为 58.1%),均超过了法国的法定时效。最后,在法国北部瓦朗谢讷附近发现了一具身份可疑的骸骨,并对各种生物组织进行了放射性碳测年。骨骼样本显示的校准死亡日期为公元 1998-2002 年(概率为 84.6%),与头发样本(公元 2013-2018 年,概率为 83.3%)不同,因为骨骼组织重塑过程较慢。DNA 分析证实了此人的身份,据报告,此人在遗骸发现前十年失踪,根据牙组织和死亡年份,放射性碳测定结果与此人的出生年份相吻合。这些案例研究表明,传统的放射性碳年代测定法和炸弹脉冲年代测定法是估算死后时间间隔的重要工具,对考古学家、法医人类学家和刑事司法系统都有好处:传统的放射性碳测年和炸弹脉冲测定是确定人类骨骼遗骸的考古相关性或医学法律意义的重要工具。炸弹脉冲测定可以评估一个人的出生年份和死亡年份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Sciences Research
Forensic Sciences Research MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信