Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up.

Q2 Medicine
Rhonda C George, Alpha Abebe
{"title":"Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up.","authors":"Rhonda C George, Alpha Abebe","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2024.27413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Disproportionately negative pandemic outcomes, lack of race-based data collection and poor engagement of Black communities in policy decision making have been widely documented for Black Canadians. We examine this to understand how formal public engagement processes might be more inclusive of Black peoples to inform more responsive policies.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study employed an asset-based lens to examine how Black communities have engaged in health policy and advocacy in Ontario. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants who self-identify as Black, recruited using purposive and intensity sampling to (1) identify <i>information-rich</i> cases, including people who have been at the forefront of high-impact work in this space and (2) participants whose mission and mandates represented diverse approaches and sub-populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings suggest that while Black community advocates face systemic and contextual barriers, they also embody deep and multifaceted knowledge, training and experience, which inform the rich ways that they approach advocacy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite its Ontario focus, this study adds breadth and depth to the existing literature on health policy and historically marginalized populations, offering broader lessons for policy makers across jurisdictions. Our findings encourage policy makers to better recognize, make space for and cultivate fertile advocacy foundations, cultural knowledge and community-driven systems already present in Black communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 SP","pages":"62-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Disproportionately negative pandemic outcomes, lack of race-based data collection and poor engagement of Black communities in policy decision making have been widely documented for Black Canadians. We examine this to understand how formal public engagement processes might be more inclusive of Black peoples to inform more responsive policies.

Methodology: The study employed an asset-based lens to examine how Black communities have engaged in health policy and advocacy in Ontario. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants who self-identify as Black, recruited using purposive and intensity sampling to (1) identify information-rich cases, including people who have been at the forefront of high-impact work in this space and (2) participants whose mission and mandates represented diverse approaches and sub-populations.

Results: Our findings suggest that while Black community advocates face systemic and contextual barriers, they also embody deep and multifaceted knowledge, training and experience, which inform the rich ways that they approach advocacy.

Discussion: Despite its Ontario focus, this study adds breadth and depth to the existing literature on health policy and historically marginalized populations, offering broader lessons for policy makers across jurisdictions. Our findings encourage policy makers to better recognize, make space for and cultivate fertile advocacy foundations, cultural knowledge and community-driven systems already present in Black communities.

安大略省黑人社区健康倡导者:安大略省黑人社区健康倡导者:从基层看健康政策参与。
研究目标:对于加拿大黑人来说,大流行病带来的负面结果不成比例、缺乏基于种族的数据收集以及黑人社区在政策决策中的参与度不高,这些问题已被广泛记录在案。我们对此进行了研究,以了解正式的公众参与过程如何才能更加包容黑人,从而为制定更具响应性的政策提供依据:本研究采用基于资产的视角来研究安大略省黑人社区如何参与卫生政策和倡导。研究人员对八名自我认同为黑人的参与者进行了深入访谈,访谈采用目的性和强度抽样法,目的是:(1)确定信息丰富的案例,包括在这一领域一直走在最前沿、影响深远的人,以及(2)其使命和任务代表不同方法和亚人群的参与者:我们的研究结果表明,虽然黑人社区倡导者面临着系统性和环境性障碍,但他们也体现了深厚和多方面的知识、培训和经验,这为他们开展倡导工作提供了丰富的方法:尽管本研究的重点是安大略省,但它为现有的有关卫生政策和历史上被边缘化人群的文献增加了广度和深度,为各辖区的政策制定者提供了更广泛的借鉴。我们的研究结果鼓励政策制定者更好地认识到黑人社区已经存在的肥沃的宣传基础、文化知识和社区驱动系统,并为其留出空间,加以培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信