Partners', Providers', and Rural Older Adults' Perspectives on Minnesota's Emergency Food System Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q3 Medicine
Patrick J Brady, Natalie Vandenburgh, Melissa N Laska
{"title":"Partners', Providers', and Rural Older Adults' Perspectives on Minnesota's Emergency Food System Emerging from the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Patrick J Brady, Natalie Vandenburgh, Melissa N Laska","doi":"10.1080/21551197.2024.2400873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our aim was to capture the perspectives of emergency food system (EFS) partners, providers, and rural older adults who receive emergency foods on their experiences throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews with partners in Minnesota's EFS (<i>n</i> = 9), rural emergency food providers (<i>n</i> = 5), and rural older adults who receive emergency food (<i>n</i> = 14) between July 2022 and February 2023. We used template analysis, a rapid qualitative method, to identify recurring perspectives across interviews. The pandemic required shifts in how providers delivered services, but their established networks, their adaptability, and substantial support enabled them to make necessary pivots. Challenges include increasing use with decreasing support, labor capacity, and the need for quality foods. Concerns about inflation-driven food insecurity and increasing reliance on the EFS were common in the context of sunsetting pandemic-related programs. Our results support that the substantial support provided throughout the pandemic enabled the EFS to continue providing services and meeting the needs of underserved populations, such as rural older adults. Policymakers should reinstate or extend the pandemic-era strategies that supported household food security and enabled the EFS to continue providing services.</p>","PeriodicalId":38899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"184-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2024.2400873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our aim was to capture the perspectives of emergency food system (EFS) partners, providers, and rural older adults who receive emergency foods on their experiences throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews with partners in Minnesota's EFS (n = 9), rural emergency food providers (n = 5), and rural older adults who receive emergency food (n = 14) between July 2022 and February 2023. We used template analysis, a rapid qualitative method, to identify recurring perspectives across interviews. The pandemic required shifts in how providers delivered services, but their established networks, their adaptability, and substantial support enabled them to make necessary pivots. Challenges include increasing use with decreasing support, labor capacity, and the need for quality foods. Concerns about inflation-driven food insecurity and increasing reliance on the EFS were common in the context of sunsetting pandemic-related programs. Our results support that the substantial support provided throughout the pandemic enabled the EFS to continue providing services and meeting the needs of underserved populations, such as rural older adults. Policymakers should reinstate or extend the pandemic-era strategies that supported household food security and enabled the EFS to continue providing services.

合作伙伴、提供者和农村老年人对 COVID-19 大流行后明尼苏达州紧急食品系统的看法。
我们的目的是了解应急食品系统(EFS)合作伙伴、供应商和接受应急食品的农村老年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。我们在 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月期间对明尼苏达州应急食品系统的合作伙伴(9 人)、农村应急食品提供者(5 人)和接受应急食品的农村老年人(14 人)进行了深入的半结构化定性访谈。我们使用模板分析这种快速定性方法来确定访谈中反复出现的观点。大流行要求医疗服务提供者改变提供服务的方式,但他们已建立的网络、他们的适应能力以及大量的支持使他们能够做出必要的调整。面临的挑战包括在支持减少的情况下增加使用量、劳动能力以及对优质食品的需求。在大流行病相关计划日落的背景下,人们普遍对通货膨胀导致的粮食不安全和日益依赖紧急粮食供应系统表示担忧。我们的研究结果表明,在整个大流行期间提供的大量支持使紧急粮食供应系统能够继续提供服务并满足服务不足人群(如农村老年人)的需求。政策制定者应该恢复或延长大流行病时期的战略,这些战略支持家庭食品安全,并使紧急粮食供应系统能够继续提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics publishes original research studies that are directly relevant to clinical and community nutrition issues that affect older adults. Epidemiologic and community-based studies are suitable for JNE, as are well-controlled clinical trials of preventive and therapeutic nutritional interventions. The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics invites papers on a broad array of topics in the nutrition and aging field, including but not limited to studies of: preventive nutrition, nutritional interventions for chronic disease, aging effects on nutritional requirements, nutritional status and dietary intake behaviors, nutritional frailty and functional status, usefulness of supplements, programmatic interventions, transitions in care and long term care, and community nutrition issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信