Assessing the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) for its validity and reliability.

IF 2.7 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2

Esma Özkan, Sümeyye Belhan Çelik, Linda Koopmans

{"title":"Assessing the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) for its validity and reliability.","authors":"Esma Özkan, Sümeyye Belhan Çelik, Linda Koopmans","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ).Methods: A total of 340 adult participants who had been working for at least 8 h a day completed the study questionnaire online. The questionnaire consisted of sections on demographics and socioeconomic characteristics, the IWPQ, and the ultrashortened version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3). Principal component analysis (PCA) with Promax rotation was conducted to assess the e three-factor structure for the Turkish version of the IWPQ. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the IWPQ and UWES-3 scales to evaluate convergent validity.Results: The three factors accounted for a total variance ratio of 60.7%. Cronbach's alphas of three subscales (task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behavior) were 0.894, 0.875, and 0.796, respectively. Test-retest reliability showed high agreement, with ICCs of 0.96, 0.98, and 0.91 for the respective scales. There was a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the task performance subscale (ρ = 0.367 and p < 0.001), a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the contextual performance subscale (ρ = 0.403 and p < 0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the CWB subscale (ρ=-0.352 and p < 0.001).Conclusions: The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) identifies work performance.The Turkish version of the IWPQ scales demonstrated validity and reliability in assessing individual work performance.","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ).

Methods: A total of 340 adult participants who had been working for at least 8 h a day completed the study questionnaire online. The questionnaire consisted of sections on demographics and socioeconomic characteristics, the IWPQ, and the ultrashortened version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3). Principal component analysis (PCA) with Promax rotation was conducted to assess the e three-factor structure for the Turkish version of the IWPQ. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the IWPQ and UWES-3 scales to evaluate convergent validity.

Results: The three factors accounted for a total variance ratio of 60.7%. Cronbach's alphas of three subscales (task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behavior) were 0.894, 0.875, and 0.796, respectively. Test-retest reliability showed high agreement, with ICCs of 0.96, 0.98, and 0.91 for the respective scales. There was a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the task performance subscale (ρ = 0.367 and p < 0.001), a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the contextual performance subscale (ρ = 0.403 and p < 0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the CWB subscale (ρ=-0.352 and p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) identifies work performance.The Turkish version of the IWPQ scales demonstrated validity and reliability in assessing individual work performance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估土耳其版个人工作绩效问卷（IWPQ）的有效性和可靠性。

背景：本研究旨在评估土耳其版个人工作绩效问卷（IWPQ）的有效性和可靠性：本研究旨在评估土耳其版个人工作绩效问卷（IWPQ）的有效性和可靠性：共有 340 名每天工作至少 8 小时的成年参与者在线填写了研究问卷。问卷内容包括人口统计学和社会经济特征、IWPQ 和乌特勒支工作参与量表（UWES-3）的超简缩版。采用 Promax 旋转法进行了主成分分析（PCA），以评估土耳其版 IWPQ 的三因素结构。Cronbach's alpha 用于确定内部一致性。类内相关系数（ICC）用于评估测试-再测可靠性。计算了 IWPQ 和 UWES-3 量表之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数，以评估收敛效度：结果：三个因子的总方差比为 60.7%。三个分量表（任务绩效、情境绩效和反工作行为）的 Cronbach's alphas 分别为 0.894、0.875 和 0.796。测试-重测信度显示出很高的一致性，各量表的 ICC 分别为 0.96、0.98 和 0.91。UWES-3 与任务绩效分量表之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性（ρ = 0.367，p 结论）：个人工作绩效问卷（IWPQ）可确定工作绩效。土耳其版 IWPQ 量表在评估个人工作绩效方面具有有效性和可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

2.80%

发文量

265

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.