Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among the pregnant women in South and South East Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Tropical Parasitology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.4103/tp.tp_7_23
Shubha Garg, Ankur Garg, N Ravishankar, Vinay Garg
{"title":"Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among the pregnant women in South and South East Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Shubha Garg, Ankur Garg, N Ravishankar, Vinay Garg","doi":"10.4103/tp.tp_7_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are a major health concern in resource-limited countries of South/South-East Asian region. Despite posing a potential threat to maternal and fetal health, there is limited data available on the actual burden of IPI among pregnant women. Through this systemic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine the pooled prevalence of IPI and species-specific prevalence among pregnant women in this region. Subgroup analysis was done by region, stool examination technique, and study settings. Among 220 retrieved studies, 21 studies from 8 countries across the region were found eligible and included in this study. The estimated overall pooled prevalence of IPIs among pregnant women was 43.15% (95% confidence interval: 30.66-56.10). The most prevalent IPI was <i>Ascaris lumbricoides</i> (25.14%) and predominant protozoa was <i>Entamoeba histolytica</i>/dispar (6.96%). In subgroup analysis, the estimated pooled prevalence of IPIs in Nepal, India, Thailand, and Thai-Burmese Border was 40.88%, 28.33%, 55.38%, and 23.78%, respectively. Studies using Kato-Katz technique for stool examination showed the highest estimated pooled IPI prevalence (62.70%). The prevalence of IPI was found to be lower in facility-based studies (38.12%) than that of studies done in the community (66.21%). Considering the high burden of IPI in pregnant women as estimated in our review and the already established impact of IPI infection on maternal health and fetal outcomes, we recommend implementation of the preventive chemotherapy during routine antenatal checkups.</p>","PeriodicalId":37825,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Parasitology","volume":"14 2","pages":"71-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473004/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tp.tp_7_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are a major health concern in resource-limited countries of South/South-East Asian region. Despite posing a potential threat to maternal and fetal health, there is limited data available on the actual burden of IPI among pregnant women. Through this systemic review and meta-analysis, we sought to determine the pooled prevalence of IPI and species-specific prevalence among pregnant women in this region. Subgroup analysis was done by region, stool examination technique, and study settings. Among 220 retrieved studies, 21 studies from 8 countries across the region were found eligible and included in this study. The estimated overall pooled prevalence of IPIs among pregnant women was 43.15% (95% confidence interval: 30.66-56.10). The most prevalent IPI was Ascaris lumbricoides (25.14%) and predominant protozoa was Entamoeba histolytica/dispar (6.96%). In subgroup analysis, the estimated pooled prevalence of IPIs in Nepal, India, Thailand, and Thai-Burmese Border was 40.88%, 28.33%, 55.38%, and 23.78%, respectively. Studies using Kato-Katz technique for stool examination showed the highest estimated pooled IPI prevalence (62.70%). The prevalence of IPI was found to be lower in facility-based studies (38.12%) than that of studies done in the community (66.21%). Considering the high burden of IPI in pregnant women as estimated in our review and the already established impact of IPI infection on maternal health and fetal outcomes, we recommend implementation of the preventive chemotherapy during routine antenatal checkups.

南亚和东南亚国家孕妇肠道寄生虫感染的流行率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
肠道寄生虫感染(IPIs)是南亚/东南亚地区资源有限国家的一大健康问题。尽管肠道寄生虫感染对孕产妇和胎儿的健康构成潜在威胁,但有关孕妇肠道寄生虫感染实际负担的数据却十分有限。通过此次系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们试图确定该地区孕妇中 IPI 的总体流行率和特定物种的流行率。我们按照地区、粪便检查技术和研究环境进行了分组分析。在检索到的 220 项研究中,来自该地区 8 个国家的 21 项研究符合条件并被纳入本研究。据估计,孕妇中 IPI 的总流行率为 43.15%(95% 置信区间:30.66-56.10)。最常见的 IPI 是蛔虫(25.14%),最主要的原生动物是组织溶解恩塔米巴虫/双球菌(6.96%)。在亚组分析中,尼泊尔、印度、泰国和泰缅边境地区的 IPI 估计总流行率分别为 40.88%、28.33%、55.38% 和 23.78%。使用卡托-卡茨技术进行粪便检查的研究显示,IPI 的估计总流行率最高(62.70%)。以医疗机构为基础的研究发现,IPI 发病率(38.12%)低于在社区进行的研究(66.21%)。考虑到我们的综述中估计的 IPI 在孕妇中的高负担,以及 IPI 感染对产妇健康和胎儿预后的既定影响,我们建议在常规产前检查中实施预防性化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Parasitology
Tropical Parasitology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Tropical Parasitology, a publication of Indian Academy of Tropical Parasitology, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Semiannual print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at www.tropicalparasitology.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of parasitology. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信