Use of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches in Adults with Long COVID in the US, a Nationally Representative Survey.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Leah Grout
{"title":"Use of Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches in Adults with Long COVID in the US, a Nationally Representative Survey.","authors":"Leah Grout","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Long COVID is a serious, complex condition that has affected the lives of millions of people globally. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches offer a wide range of potential therapies for the management of long COVID symptoms. However, there is limited information available about the utilization of CIH among long COVID patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Nationally representative cross-sectional data from the United States 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, response rate 47.7%, <i>n</i> = 27,651) were used to investigate prevalence and predictors of CIH use in the past 12 months among individuals who experienced long COVID. The 12-month prevalence of CIH use was descriptively analyzed for those with long COVID versus those without using chi-squared tests or unpaired <i>t</i>-tests. Independent predictors of CIH use among individuals with long COVID were analyzed using a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A weighted total of 17,610,801 US adults (19.7%) who had a confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) developed long COVID symptoms. A slightly greater proportion of individuals with long COVID (44.4%) than those without (40.9%) used CIH approaches in the past 12 months. The most used approaches were meditation, yoga, and massage therapy. CIH use by those with long COVID was significantly associated with younger age, female sex, higher education level, having health insurance coverage, higher household income level, receiving three or more COVID-19 vaccination doses, ever having asthma, and ever having an anxiety or depression diagnosis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Long COVID represents a major challenge for patients, health care providers, health care systems, economies, and global public health. CIH approaches may play an important role in symptom management for some patients, and additional research is needed to identify which modalities are most effective. Patients and health care providers may benefit from better information about the available options for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long COVID is a serious, complex condition that has affected the lives of millions of people globally. Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches offer a wide range of potential therapies for the management of long COVID symptoms. However, there is limited information available about the utilization of CIH among long COVID patients. Methods: Nationally representative cross-sectional data from the United States 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, response rate 47.7%, n = 27,651) were used to investigate prevalence and predictors of CIH use in the past 12 months among individuals who experienced long COVID. The 12-month prevalence of CIH use was descriptively analyzed for those with long COVID versus those without using chi-squared tests or unpaired t-tests. Independent predictors of CIH use among individuals with long COVID were analyzed using a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: A weighted total of 17,610,801 US adults (19.7%) who had a confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) developed long COVID symptoms. A slightly greater proportion of individuals with long COVID (44.4%) than those without (40.9%) used CIH approaches in the past 12 months. The most used approaches were meditation, yoga, and massage therapy. CIH use by those with long COVID was significantly associated with younger age, female sex, higher education level, having health insurance coverage, higher household income level, receiving three or more COVID-19 vaccination doses, ever having asthma, and ever having an anxiety or depression diagnosis. Conclusions: Long COVID represents a major challenge for patients, health care providers, health care systems, economies, and global public health. CIH approaches may play an important role in symptom management for some patients, and additional research is needed to identify which modalities are most effective. Patients and health care providers may benefit from better information about the available options for treatment.

一项具有全国代表性的调查显示,美国长期慢性阻塞性肺病成人使用补充和综合保健方法的情况。
背景:长期慢性阻塞性脉管炎是一种严重、复杂的疾病,已影响到全球数百万人的生活。补充和综合保健(CIH)方法为控制长期慢性阻塞性肺气肿症状提供了广泛的潜在疗法。然而,有关长程COVID患者使用CIH的信息却很有限。研究方法利用美国 2022 年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS,回复率 47.7%,n = 27,651)中具有全国代表性的横断面数据,调查了过去 12 个月内长期 COVID 患者使用 CIH 的流行率和预测因素。使用卡方检验或非配对 t 检验对有长期 COVID 与无长期 COVID 的人群在 12 个月内使用 CIH 的情况进行了描述性分析。使用逐步多元逻辑回归分析法对有长期 COVID 的人群使用 CIH 的独立预测因素进行了分析。研究结果在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)确诊病例中,共有17,610,801名美国成年人(19.7%)出现了长COVID症状。在过去的12个月中,有长期COVID症状的人(44.4%)使用CIH方法的比例略高于无COVID症状的人(40.9%)。使用最多的方法是冥想、瑜伽和按摩疗法。长期慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用 CIH 与以下因素明显相关:年龄较小、性别为女性、教育程度较高、有医疗保险、家庭收入水平较高、接种过三次或三次以上的 COVID-19 疫苗、曾经患有哮喘以及曾经被诊断患有焦虑症或抑郁症。结论长期接种 COVID 对患者、医疗保健提供者、医疗保健系统、经济和全球公共卫生来说都是一项重大挑战。CIH 方法可能会在某些患者的症状管理中发挥重要作用,需要进行更多的研究来确定哪些方式最有效。患者和医疗服务提供者可以从有关现有治疗方案的更多信息中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信