[Comparison of the analgesic effects of infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block under ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery].

Q3 Medicine
L Xie, X Y Jia, M Z An, Y Z Xi, Z P Li, Q H Zhou
{"title":"[Comparison of the analgesic effects of infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block under ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery].","authors":"L Xie, X Y Jia, M Z An, Y Z Xi, Z P Li, Q H Zhou","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240306-00504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from December 2023 to February 2024 were prospectively included, whose age ranged from 18 to 80 years and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅲ. Patients were divided into two groups using block randomization: infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block group (observation group) and interscalene block group (control group), with 37 cases in each group. In the anesthesia preparation room, all patients received nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all patients following surgery. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain within 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included the highest NRS score within 48 hours postoperatively, the amount of sufentanil used via PCIA within 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of rescue analgesia and rebound pain, QoR-40 scores, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. The non-inferiority margin for the AUC of NRS scores between the two types of regional nerve blocks was set at \"2.6\". <b>Results:</b> A total of 35 patients were included in the observation group [17 males, 18 females, aged (58.1±9.1) years], and 36 patients were included in the control group [12 males, 24 females, aged (57.0±9.8) years]. The AUC of the NRS scores at rest within 24 hours post-operation was 51.7±10.9 in the observation group and 62.6±13.6 in the control group. The difference in AUC between the two groups was -10.9 (95%<i>CI</i>:-16.8--5.1), with the upper limit of the 95%<i>CI</i> falling below the predefined non-inferiority margin of \"2.6\" (non-inferiority <i>P</i><0.001). The highest NRS score [<i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>)] within 48 hours post-surgery was 3 (3, 4) in the control group, which was significantly higher than the observation group's score of 2 (2, 3) (<i>P</i><0.001). During the postoperative period of 0-12 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly higher than the control group's dose of 8 (6, 10) μg (<i>P</i><0.001). During the postoperative period of 12-24 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 8 (8, 10) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly lower than the control group's median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg (<i>P</i><0.001). During the postoperative period of 24-48 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in the dose of sufentanil between the two groups of patients (<i>P</i>=0.548). In the observation group, the incidence of rescue analgesia within 48 hours postoperatively was 0 (0/35), which was lower than that of the control group at 22.2% (8/36) (<i>P</i>=0.010). The occurrence of rebound pain in the observation group was 0 (0/35), and the control group was 11.1% (4/36), no statistically significant difference was found between two groups (<i>P</i>=0.130). In the observation group, the QoR-40 score within 24 hours post-operation was 180.2±3.2, which was higher than the control group's score of 175.8±4.7 (<i>P</i><0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours between the two groups (<i>P</i>=0.372). <b>Conclusion:</b> Ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block demonstrates a comparable analgesic effect to interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery within the first 24 hours postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 39","pages":"3661-3668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240306-00504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. Methods: A total of 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from December 2023 to February 2024 were prospectively included, whose age ranged from 18 to 80 years and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅲ. Patients were divided into two groups using block randomization: infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block group (observation group) and interscalene block group (control group), with 37 cases in each group. In the anesthesia preparation room, all patients received nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all patients following surgery. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain within 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included the highest NRS score within 48 hours postoperatively, the amount of sufentanil used via PCIA within 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of rescue analgesia and rebound pain, QoR-40 scores, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. The non-inferiority margin for the AUC of NRS scores between the two types of regional nerve blocks was set at "2.6". Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the observation group [17 males, 18 females, aged (58.1±9.1) years], and 36 patients were included in the control group [12 males, 24 females, aged (57.0±9.8) years]. The AUC of the NRS scores at rest within 24 hours post-operation was 51.7±10.9 in the observation group and 62.6±13.6 in the control group. The difference in AUC between the two groups was -10.9 (95%CI:-16.8--5.1), with the upper limit of the 95%CI falling below the predefined non-inferiority margin of "2.6" (non-inferiority P<0.001). The highest NRS score [M (Q1, Q3)] within 48 hours post-surgery was 3 (3, 4) in the control group, which was significantly higher than the observation group's score of 2 (2, 3) (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 0-12 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly higher than the control group's dose of 8 (6, 10) μg (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 12-24 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 8 (8, 10) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly lower than the control group's median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg (P<0.001). During the postoperative period of 24-48 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in the dose of sufentanil between the two groups of patients (P=0.548). In the observation group, the incidence of rescue analgesia within 48 hours postoperatively was 0 (0/35), which was lower than that of the control group at 22.2% (8/36) (P=0.010). The occurrence of rebound pain in the observation group was 0 (0/35), and the control group was 11.1% (4/36), no statistically significant difference was found between two groups (P=0.130). In the observation group, the QoR-40 score within 24 hours post-operation was 180.2±3.2, which was higher than the control group's score of 175.8±4.7 (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours between the two groups (P=0.372). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block demonstrates a comparable analgesic effect to interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery within the first 24 hours postoperatively.

[肩关节镜手术患者在超声引导下接受冈下-小趾筋膜间阻滞和椎间孔阻滞的镇痛效果比较]。
目的比较肩关节镜手术中超声引导下的冈下-冈上小筋膜间阻滞和肩胛间阻滞的术后镇痛效果。方法:前瞻性纳入2023年12月至2024年2月在嘉兴学院附属医院接受肩关节镜手术的74例患者,年龄18-80岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ-Ⅲ级。采用阻滞随机法将患者分为两组:冈下-拇趾小肌筋膜间阻滞组(观察组)和椎间孔阻滞组(对照组),每组37例。在麻醉准备室,所有患者均在超声引导下接受神经阻滞,使用 20 毫升 0.375% 罗哌卡因。手术后,所有患者都接受了患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。主要结果是术后 24 小时内疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)的曲线下面积(AUC)。次要结果指标包括术后 48 小时内的最高 NRS 评分、术后 48 小时内通过 PCIA 使用的舒芬太尼量、镇痛抢救和反跳痛的发生率、QoR-40 评分以及术后 24 小时内的恶心和呕吐率。两种区域神经阻滞的 NRS 评分 AUC 非劣效区间距定为 "2.6"。结果观察组共纳入 35 例患者[男 17 例,女 18 例,年龄(58.1±9.1)岁],对照组共纳入 36 例患者[男 12 例,女 24 例,年龄(57.0±9.8)岁]。观察组患者术后 24 小时内静息时 NRS 评分的 AUC 为(51.7±10.9)分,对照组为(62.6±13.6)分。两组间的AUC差异为-10.9(95%CI:-16.8--5.1),95%CI的上限低于预先设定的非劣效边际 "2.6"(非劣效PM(Q1,Q3)],对照组术后48小时内的评分为3(3,4)分,明显高于观察组的2(2,3)分(PPPP=0.548)。观察组术后 48 小时内镇痛抢救发生率为 0(0/35),低于对照组的 22.2%(8/36)(P=0.010)。观察组的反跳痛发生率为 0(0/35),对照组为 11.1%(4/36),两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.130)。观察组术后 24 小时内 QoR-40 评分为 180.2±3.2,高于对照组的 175.8±4.7(PP=0.372)。结论在肩关节镜手术中,超声引导下的冈下-肩小肌筋膜间阻滞在术后24小时内的镇痛效果与椎间孔阻滞相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信