Patient preferences regarding the cervix, ovaries, and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy: a qualitative study.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jenna C Adams, Madelyn Conner, Jacqueline Wong, Andrea Knittel, Michelle Louie
{"title":"Patient preferences regarding the cervix, ovaries, and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy: a qualitative study.","authors":"Jenna C Adams, Madelyn Conner, Jacqueline Wong, Andrea Knittel, Michelle Louie","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2024.2416219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective is to understand patients' preexisting values, beliefs, and preferences regarding removal or preservation of the cervix, ovaries, and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications. We performed semi-structured interviews from August 2021 to March 2022 with patients referred for hysterectomy. Participants were recruited according to pre-specified diversity axes. The interview guide was informed by literature review, expert stakeholders, and pilot testing. pers. comm. occurred prior to scheduled consultation. Responses were analyzed for themes, with thematic saturation reached. Age of participants (<i>n</i> = 13) ranged from 24 to 60 years. Identified themes included knowledge, decision-making, treatment goals, short- and long-term consequences, fertility, identity, and lack of concern. Many participants expressed lacking necessary knowledge of the risks and benefits of removing the cervix and adnexa. Treatment goals included symptom relief and definitive treatment. Long-term consequences included concerns about menopause and future cancer. Many patients expressed some degree of lack of knowledge, desire to remove most or all pelvic structures, or no attachment to their reproductive organs. Many patients expressed decision-making based on the effects of organ removal on long-term consequences and the relief of current symptoms, rather than immediate surgical risk. This information can help to inform patient-centered surgical counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2416219","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective is to understand patients' preexisting values, beliefs, and preferences regarding removal or preservation of the cervix, ovaries, and fallopian tubes at the time of hysterectomy for benign indications. We performed semi-structured interviews from August 2021 to March 2022 with patients referred for hysterectomy. Participants were recruited according to pre-specified diversity axes. The interview guide was informed by literature review, expert stakeholders, and pilot testing. pers. comm. occurred prior to scheduled consultation. Responses were analyzed for themes, with thematic saturation reached. Age of participants (n = 13) ranged from 24 to 60 years. Identified themes included knowledge, decision-making, treatment goals, short- and long-term consequences, fertility, identity, and lack of concern. Many participants expressed lacking necessary knowledge of the risks and benefits of removing the cervix and adnexa. Treatment goals included symptom relief and definitive treatment. Long-term consequences included concerns about menopause and future cancer. Many patients expressed some degree of lack of knowledge, desire to remove most or all pelvic structures, or no attachment to their reproductive organs. Many patients expressed decision-making based on the effects of organ removal on long-term consequences and the relief of current symptoms, rather than immediate surgical risk. This information can help to inform patient-centered surgical counseling.

子宫切除术时患者对宫颈、卵巢和输卵管的偏好:一项定性研究。
我们的目的是了解患者在因良性适应症进行子宫切除术时对切除或保留宫颈、卵巢和输卵管的已有价值观、信念和偏好。我们在 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 3 月期间对转诊接受子宫切除术的患者进行了半结构式访谈。参与者是根据预先指定的多样性轴线招募的。访谈指南参考了文献综述、专家利益相关者和试点测试。我们对参与者的回答进行了主题分析,并达到了主题饱和度。参与者的年龄(n = 13)从 24 岁到 60 岁不等。确定的主题包括知识、决策、治疗目标、短期和长期后果、生育能力、身份和缺乏关注。许多参与者表示对切除宫颈和附件的风险和益处缺乏必要的了解。治疗目标包括缓解症状和彻底治疗。长期后果包括对更年期和未来癌症的担忧。许多患者表示在某种程度上缺乏相关知识,希望切除大部分或全部盆腔结构,或对生殖器官没有任何依恋。许多患者在做决定时考虑的是切除器官对长期后果的影响以及对当前症状的缓解,而不是眼前的手术风险。这些信息有助于提供以患者为中心的手术咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信