[Efficacy and feasibility of tunnel esophagogastrostomy to perform proximal gastrectomy].

Q3 Medicine
C Yue, R Peng, G L Sun, L Chen, H T Wang, W G Xu, W Wei, B Zhou, X Wen, R M Gu, X Z Ming, H Q Chen, G Li
{"title":"[Efficacy and feasibility of tunnel esophagogastrostomy to perform proximal gastrectomy].","authors":"C Yue, R Peng, G L Sun, L Chen, H T Wang, W G Xu, W Wei, B Zhou, X Wen, R M Gu, X Z Ming, H Q Chen, G Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240614-00211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To analyze the efficacy and feasibility of performing a new surgical procedure, tunnel esophagogastrostomy, to perform proximal gastrectomy. <b>Methods:</b> The study cohort comprised 10 consecutive patients who had undergone esophagogastrostomy by the tunnel technique in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between October 2019 and July 2022. All patients were male. Their average age was (64.2±8.1) years and body mass index (25.5±3.2) kg/m2. Nine had upper gastric body adenocarcinoma, the remaining one having signet ring cell carcinoma. TNM staging of the tumors showed that seven were Stage IA, one Stage IB, one Stage IIA, and one Stage IIIA. Briefly, tunnel esophagogastrostomy is performed as follows: After performing a proximal gastrectomy, a rectangular seromuscular flap (3.0 cm × 3.5 cm) is created. The posterior esophageal wall is sutured to the gastric wall at the orad end of the seromuscular flap 5 cm from the stump with three to four stitches. Next, the stump of the esophagus is opened, the posterior esophageal wall is sutured to the gastric mucosa and submucosa, and the anterior esophageal wall is sutured to the full layer of the stomach. Finally, the caudad end of the seromuscular flap is closed. Data on surgical safety, postoperative morbidity, and postoperative reflux esophagitis were analyzed. All enrolled patients completed endoscopic follow-up 1 year and 2 years after surgery. <b>Results:</b> All procedures were completed. They comprised four cases of laparoscopic assisted surgery, four of DaVinci robotic surgery, and two of open surgery. The mean operation time was 212.7±33.2 mins, mean anastomosis time (51.6±5.3) minutes, mean tunnel preparation time (20.0±3.5) minutes, and mean operative blood loss (90.0±51.6) mL. The time to first postoperative passage of flatus was (64.8±11.5) hours. The mean hospital stay after surgery was (9.2±1.7) days. There were no postoperative complications above Clavien-Dindo Grade II. The mean preoperative Reflux Disease Questionnaire score was (3.3± 0.4) before the surgery, (3.8±1.0) 1 month postoperatively, and (3.3±0.4) 12 months postoperatively. All patients underwent endoscopic follow-up; no anastomotic stenoses were found. However, one patient had Grade A reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery and another Grade B reflux esophagitis 2 years after surgery. <b>Conclusion:</b> Esophagogastrostomy by the tunnel technique is a safe and feasible means of performing proximal gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 10","pages":"1045-1049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240614-00211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and feasibility of performing a new surgical procedure, tunnel esophagogastrostomy, to perform proximal gastrectomy. Methods: The study cohort comprised 10 consecutive patients who had undergone esophagogastrostomy by the tunnel technique in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between October 2019 and July 2022. All patients were male. Their average age was (64.2±8.1) years and body mass index (25.5±3.2) kg/m2. Nine had upper gastric body adenocarcinoma, the remaining one having signet ring cell carcinoma. TNM staging of the tumors showed that seven were Stage IA, one Stage IB, one Stage IIA, and one Stage IIIA. Briefly, tunnel esophagogastrostomy is performed as follows: After performing a proximal gastrectomy, a rectangular seromuscular flap (3.0 cm × 3.5 cm) is created. The posterior esophageal wall is sutured to the gastric wall at the orad end of the seromuscular flap 5 cm from the stump with three to four stitches. Next, the stump of the esophagus is opened, the posterior esophageal wall is sutured to the gastric mucosa and submucosa, and the anterior esophageal wall is sutured to the full layer of the stomach. Finally, the caudad end of the seromuscular flap is closed. Data on surgical safety, postoperative morbidity, and postoperative reflux esophagitis were analyzed. All enrolled patients completed endoscopic follow-up 1 year and 2 years after surgery. Results: All procedures were completed. They comprised four cases of laparoscopic assisted surgery, four of DaVinci robotic surgery, and two of open surgery. The mean operation time was 212.7±33.2 mins, mean anastomosis time (51.6±5.3) minutes, mean tunnel preparation time (20.0±3.5) minutes, and mean operative blood loss (90.0±51.6) mL. The time to first postoperative passage of flatus was (64.8±11.5) hours. The mean hospital stay after surgery was (9.2±1.7) days. There were no postoperative complications above Clavien-Dindo Grade II. The mean preoperative Reflux Disease Questionnaire score was (3.3± 0.4) before the surgery, (3.8±1.0) 1 month postoperatively, and (3.3±0.4) 12 months postoperatively. All patients underwent endoscopic follow-up; no anastomotic stenoses were found. However, one patient had Grade A reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery and another Grade B reflux esophagitis 2 years after surgery. Conclusion: Esophagogastrostomy by the tunnel technique is a safe and feasible means of performing proximal gastrectomy.

[隧道式食管胃切除术进行近端胃切除术的有效性和可行性]。
目的分析采用一种新的手术方法--隧道式食管胃切除术进行近端胃切除术的有效性和可行性。研究方法研究队列包括2019年10月至2022年7月期间在江苏省肿瘤医院连续接受隧道技术食管胃切除术的10例患者。所有患者均为男性。平均年龄(64.2±8.1)岁,体重指数(25.5±3.2)kg/m2。其中九人患有上胃体腺癌,其余一人患有标志环细胞癌。肿瘤的 TNM 分期显示,7 例为 IA 期,1 例 IB 期,1 例 IIA 期,1 例 IIIA 期。简而言之,隧道式食管胃切除术的手术过程如下:进行近端胃切除术后,制作一个长方形蚕膜瓣(3.0 厘米 × 3.5 厘米)。在距残端 5 厘米处将食管后壁与胃壁缝合,缝合针数为三至四针。然后,打开食管残端,将食管后壁与胃黏膜和黏膜下层缝合,将食管前壁与胃全层缝合。最后,缝合浆膜肌瓣的尾端。对手术安全性、术后发病率和术后反流性食管炎的数据进行了分析。所有入组患者均在术后 1 年和 2 年完成了内镜随访。结果所有手术均已完成。其中四例为腹腔镜辅助手术,四例为达芬奇机器人手术,两例为开腹手术。平均手术时间(212.7±33.2)分钟,平均吻合时间(51.6±5.3)分钟,平均隧道准备时间(20.0±3.5)分钟,平均手术失血量(90.0±51.6)毫升。术后首次排气时间为(64.8±11.5)小时。术后平均住院时间为(9.2±1.7)天。术后无 Clavien-Dindo II 级以上并发症。术前反流病问卷平均得分为(3.3±0.4)分,术后1个月(3.8±1.0)分,术后12个月(3.3±0.4)分。所有患者均接受了内镜随访,未发现吻合口狭窄。不过,一名患者在术后 1 年出现 A 级反流性食管炎,另一名患者在术后 2 年出现 B 级反流性食管炎。结论采用隧道技术进行食管胃切除术是一种安全可行的近端胃切除术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信