Bladder Cancer detection by urinary methylation markers GHSR/MAL: a validation study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
I J Beijert, Y van den Burgt, A E Hentschel, J Bosschieter, P C Kauer, B I Lissenberg-Witte, R J A van Moorselaar, J A Nieuwenhuijzen, R D M Steenbergen
{"title":"Bladder Cancer detection by urinary methylation markers GHSR/MAL: a validation study.","authors":"I J Beijert, Y van den Burgt, A E Hentschel, J Bosschieter, P C Kauer, B I Lissenberg-Witte, R J A van Moorselaar, J A Nieuwenhuijzen, R D M Steenbergen","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05287-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although cystoscopy is a reliable tool for detecting bladder cancer, it poses a high burden on patients and entails high costs. This highlights the need for non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. This study aimed to validate a previously developed urinary methylation marker panel containing GHSR and MAL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 134 patients who underwent cystoscopy because of hematuria, including 63 individuals with primary bladder cancer and 71 with non-malignant findings. Urine samples were self-collected at home and sent via regular mail. Subsequently, DNA was extracted and the hypermethylation of GHSR and MAL was evaluated using quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The performance of methylation markers was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis and sensitivity and specificity based on pre-established cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation of the marker panel GHSR/MAL resulted in an AUC of 0.87 at 79% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Sensitivity was comparable to the previous investigation (P > 0.9), though specificity was significantly lower (P = 0.026). Sensitivity was higher for high-grade tumors compared to low-grade tumors (94% vs. 60%, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation of the GHSR/MAL methylation marker panel on at home collected urine samples confirms its robust performance for bladder cancer detection in a hematuria population, and underscores the diagnostic potential for future clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05287-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although cystoscopy is a reliable tool for detecting bladder cancer, it poses a high burden on patients and entails high costs. This highlights the need for non-invasive and cost-effective alternatives. This study aimed to validate a previously developed urinary methylation marker panel containing GHSR and MAL.

Methods: We enrolled 134 patients who underwent cystoscopy because of hematuria, including 63 individuals with primary bladder cancer and 71 with non-malignant findings. Urine samples were self-collected at home and sent via regular mail. Subsequently, DNA was extracted and the hypermethylation of GHSR and MAL was evaluated using quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The performance of methylation markers was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis and sensitivity and specificity based on pre-established cut-off values.

Results: Validation of the marker panel GHSR/MAL resulted in an AUC of 0.87 at 79% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Sensitivity was comparable to the previous investigation (P > 0.9), though specificity was significantly lower (P = 0.026). Sensitivity was higher for high-grade tumors compared to low-grade tumors (94% vs. 60%, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: Validation of the GHSR/MAL methylation marker panel on at home collected urine samples confirms its robust performance for bladder cancer detection in a hematuria population, and underscores the diagnostic potential for future clinical application.

通过尿液甲基化标记物 GHSR/MAL 检测膀胱癌:一项验证研究。
目的:尽管膀胱镜检查是检测膀胱癌的可靠工具,但它给患者带来了沉重的负担,而且费用高昂。这就凸显了对非侵入性且具有成本效益的替代方法的需求。本研究旨在验证之前开发的包含 GHSR 和 MAL 的尿液甲基化标记物面板:我们招募了 134 名因血尿而接受膀胱镜检查的患者,其中包括 63 名原发性膀胱癌患者和 71 名非恶性膀胱癌患者。尿液样本在家中自行采集,并通过普通邮件寄出。随后,提取 DNA 并使用定量甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应评估 GHSR 和 MAL 的高甲基化程度。使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析法评估甲基化标记物的性能,并根据预先确定的临界值评估灵敏度和特异性:结果:通过对标记物面板 GHSR/MAL 的验证,AUC 为 0.87,灵敏度为 79%,特异度为 80%。灵敏度与之前的调查相当(P > 0.9),但特异性明显降低(P = 0.026)。与低级别肿瘤相比,高级别肿瘤的灵敏度更高(94% 对 60%,P = 0.002):结论:GHSR/MAL甲基化标记物面板在家庭收集的尿液样本中的验证证实了其在血尿人群中检测膀胱癌的强大性能,并强调了其在未来临床应用中的诊断潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信