The clinical significance of elastic lamina invasion in patients with pStage II colorectal cancer: a notable prognostic indicator.

Abstract

Background: Some colorectal cancers (CRCs) are clinically diagnosed as cT4a with　serosal invasion (SI). However, the cT4a is most often underdiagnosed pathologically as pT3 without SI by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining alone. Using Elastica van Gieson (EVG) staining, some pT3 tumors invade the elastic lamina (EL), which extends just below the serosal layer. Recently, EL invasion (ELI) has been described as a poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with pStage II CRC. However, its clinicopathological significance remains unclear due to the limited number of studies and poor understanding of ELI.

Objective: This study investigated the association between the ELI and patient prognosis.

Methods: After 1982, pathological diagnosis was routinely performed using H&E and EVG staining methods, and long-term follow up was performed until 2016. All clinicopathological features including ELI were prospectively registered into our computer and 569 patients with pStage II CRC were collected from the database. Based on the ELI status, pT3 was divided into three pathological categories: pT3ELI - was defined as pT3a, pT3ELI + as pT3b and unidentified EL (pT3EL -) as pT3u.

Results: Using H&E staining alone, gross cT4a was most often pathologically underdiagnosed as pT3 (93.8%) and very rarely as pT4a, resulting in a large diagnostic discrepancy. Using EVG staining, 60.7% of the cT4a tumors were diagnosed as pT3b. The 10-year DFS and OS rates were similar for pT3a and pT3u patients. However, the 10-year DFS and OS rates of pT3b patients were significantly lower than those of pT3a patients (75.6% vs. 95.6%, p < 0.0001 and 58.4% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.0024, respectively) but did not differ from those of pT4a patients (70.6%, p = 0.5799 and 52.0%, p = 0.1116, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the ELI was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrence and CRC-specific death (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: A better understanding of the ELI allows us to reconsider the diagnostic discrepancy of serosal invasion, i.e., pT3b should be considered pT4a. The ELI-based subclassification of pT3 is expected to be incorporated into the TNM staging system in the future. The ELI is a notable prognostic indicator in patients with pStage II CRC.