Equivalence in intradermal reactions to histamine and compound 48/80 in dogs before and after sedation with dexmedetomidine or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Domenico Santoro, Raiane A Moura, Stuart R McKenzie, Ludovica Chiavaccini
{"title":"Equivalence in intradermal reactions to histamine and compound 48/80 in dogs before and after sedation with dexmedetomidine or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan.","authors":"Domenico Santoro, Raiane A Moura, Stuart R McKenzie, Ludovica Chiavaccini","doi":"10.1111/vde.13306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intradermal allergen testing (IDAT) is commonly used to formulate allergen-specific immunotherapy, a pillar treatment for canine atopic dermatitis. Many sedatives have shown histaminergic or anti-histaminergic effects and thus been deemed unsuitable for IDAT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine whether, in healthy dogs, dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor) or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan (Zenalpha) will affect intradermal reactions compared to unsedated dogs.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Ten privately owned healthy dogs were enrolled in this equivalence study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Wheal formation was subjectively and objectively assessed in conscious then sedated dogs. Dogs were randomly sedated with either Dexdomitor (dexmedetomidine [0.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup>]) or Zenalpha (medetomidine [1 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/vatinoxan] 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) intramuscularly. Once sedated, five 10-fold histamine (100-0.01 μg/mL) and compound 48/80 (200-0.02 μg/mL) dilutions were intradermally injected into the lateral thorax. The study was repeated on the opposite side with the alternative sedation 1 week later. Quality of sedation, cardiorespiratory function and rectal temperature were recorded every 5 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in the median values of the reactions with either sedative when compared to unsedated dogs. Dexdomitor and Zenalpha achieved an equivalence in both subjective and objective scoring systems for all concentrations tested. A faster median time to sedation (10 vs. 18 min, p = 0.013) was seen with Zenalpha compared to Dexdomitor. Although both sedatives depressed the cardiovascular function, such parameters were less affected by Zenalpha than by Dexdomitor (p ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Owing to the lack of effects on wheal formation, both sedatives are appropriate for sedating dogs undergoing IDAT. Although, such results should be validated in allergic dogs. Zenalpha may induce more rapid and reliable sedation than Dexdomitor.</p>","PeriodicalId":23599,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intradermal allergen testing (IDAT) is commonly used to formulate allergen-specific immunotherapy, a pillar treatment for canine atopic dermatitis. Many sedatives have shown histaminergic or anti-histaminergic effects and thus been deemed unsuitable for IDAT.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine whether, in healthy dogs, dexmedetomidine (Dexdomitor) or a 1:20 combination of medetomidine and vatinoxan (Zenalpha) will affect intradermal reactions compared to unsedated dogs.

Animals: Ten privately owned healthy dogs were enrolled in this equivalence study.

Materials and methods: Wheal formation was subjectively and objectively assessed in conscious then sedated dogs. Dogs were randomly sedated with either Dexdomitor (dexmedetomidine [0.5 mg/m2]) or Zenalpha (medetomidine [1 mg/m2/vatinoxan] 20 mg/m2) intramuscularly. Once sedated, five 10-fold histamine (100-0.01 μg/mL) and compound 48/80 (200-0.02 μg/mL) dilutions were intradermally injected into the lateral thorax. The study was repeated on the opposite side with the alternative sedation 1 week later. Quality of sedation, cardiorespiratory function and rectal temperature were recorded every 5 min.

Results: There was no difference in the median values of the reactions with either sedative when compared to unsedated dogs. Dexdomitor and Zenalpha achieved an equivalence in both subjective and objective scoring systems for all concentrations tested. A faster median time to sedation (10 vs. 18 min, p = 0.013) was seen with Zenalpha compared to Dexdomitor. Although both sedatives depressed the cardiovascular function, such parameters were less affected by Zenalpha than by Dexdomitor (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: Owing to the lack of effects on wheal formation, both sedatives are appropriate for sedating dogs undergoing IDAT. Although, such results should be validated in allergic dogs. Zenalpha may induce more rapid and reliable sedation than Dexdomitor.

使用右美托咪定或美托咪定与华替诺生1:20组合镇静前后,狗对组胺和48/80化合物的皮内反应相同。
背景:皮内过敏原检测(IDAT)通常用于制定过敏原特异性免疫疗法,这是治疗犬特应性皮炎的支柱疗法。许多镇静剂具有组织胺或抗组胺作用,因此被认为不适合用于 IDAT:本研究的目的是确定与未镇静的狗相比,右美托咪定(Dexdomitor)或美托咪定与维甲酸(Zenalpha)1:20 的组合是否会影响健康狗的皮内反应:十只私人饲养的健康狗参加了这项等效研究:对有意识的狗进行主观和客观评估。随机给狗肌肉注射 Dexdomitor(右美托咪定 [0.5 mg/m2])或 Zenalpha(美托咪定 [1 mg/m2/vatinoxan] 20 mg/m2)镇静剂。镇静后,在侧胸部皮内注射 5 支 10 倍组胺(100-0.01 μg/mL)和化合物 48/80(200-0.02 μg/mL)稀释液。一周后在另一侧重复该研究,并使用另一种镇静剂。每 5 分钟记录一次镇静质量、心肺功能和直肠温度:结果:与未镇静的狗相比,两种镇静剂的反应中值没有差异。在所有测试浓度下,Dexdomitor和Zenalpha在主观和客观评分系统中都达到了同等水平。与Dexdomitor相比,Zenalpha的中位镇静时间更短(10分钟对18分钟,p = 0.013)。虽然两种镇静剂都会抑制心血管功能,但Zenalpha对这些参数的影响小于Dexdomitor(p ≤ 0.001):由于这两种镇静剂对乳清形成没有影响,因此适合用于对接受 IDAT 的狗进行镇静。不过,这种结果应在过敏性犬中进行验证。与Dexdomitor相比,Zenalpha可诱导更快速、更可靠的镇静。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary dermatology
Veterinary dermatology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
21.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Dermatology is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed, international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of the skin of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. Scientific research papers, clinical case reports and reviews covering the following aspects of dermatology will be considered for publication: -Skin structure (anatomy, histology, ultrastructure) -Skin function (physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, genetics) -Skin microbiology and parasitology -Dermatopathology -Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases -New disease entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信