Reem Youssef, Jessica L Davis, William J Anderson, Andres M Acosta
{"title":"Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma presenting as a penile lesion.","authors":"Reem Youssef, Jessica L Davis, William J Anderson, Andres M Acosta","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03944-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PHE) is a rare, usually multifocal neoplasm typically affecting individuals in the second-to-fourth decade of life, with a male predominance. It often arises in the distal extremities and characteristically involves multiple tissue planes. Presentation of this neoplasm as a primary penile lesion is exceedingly rare, with only five cases previously documented in the literature. We report the clinicopathologic features of five additional PHEs presenting as primary penile tumors and review previously published cases. Tumors affected young to middle-aged adult patients and had a relatively bland clinical appearance, mimicking indolent lesions such as epidermal inclusion cysts. Microscopically, they were ill-defined nodules composed of plump spindle cells and round neoplastic cells with abundant, densely eosinophilic cytoplasm and eccentric nuclei resembling rhabdomyoblasts. Neoplastic cells demonstrated infiltrative growth, including foci of perineural invasion. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated invariable co-expression of keratins, endothelial markers (CD31 and/or ERG), and FOSB. In conclusion, penile PHE is rare but should be considered in the differential diagnosis of penile lesions with spindle cell and/or rhabdomyoblast-like morphology affecting young to middle-aged adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03944-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (PHE) is a rare, usually multifocal neoplasm typically affecting individuals in the second-to-fourth decade of life, with a male predominance. It often arises in the distal extremities and characteristically involves multiple tissue planes. Presentation of this neoplasm as a primary penile lesion is exceedingly rare, with only five cases previously documented in the literature. We report the clinicopathologic features of five additional PHEs presenting as primary penile tumors and review previously published cases. Tumors affected young to middle-aged adult patients and had a relatively bland clinical appearance, mimicking indolent lesions such as epidermal inclusion cysts. Microscopically, they were ill-defined nodules composed of plump spindle cells and round neoplastic cells with abundant, densely eosinophilic cytoplasm and eccentric nuclei resembling rhabdomyoblasts. Neoplastic cells demonstrated infiltrative growth, including foci of perineural invasion. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated invariable co-expression of keratins, endothelial markers (CD31 and/or ERG), and FOSB. In conclusion, penile PHE is rare but should be considered in the differential diagnosis of penile lesions with spindle cell and/or rhabdomyoblast-like morphology affecting young to middle-aged adult patients.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.