D D Sugrue, F Ryan, M Courtney, M Horan, M B Codd, L C McLoughlin, P E Lonergan, R P Manecksha
{"title":"Factors affecting radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis.","authors":"D D Sugrue, F Ryan, M Courtney, M Horan, M B Codd, L C McLoughlin, P E Lonergan, R P Manecksha","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure.A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics.Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5-8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm<sup>3</sup> (IQR, 60-206 mm<sup>3</sup>). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9-7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01).It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01648-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis. There is increasing concern regarding the cumulative radiation dose associated with medical imaging and its adverse effects. This study aimed to assess radiation exposure in patients undergoing endoscopic management of urolithiasis and to identify factors associated with increased exposure.A retrospective analysis of all consecutive symptomatic urolithiasis cases who underwent endoscopic surgery over a two-year period at a tertiary referral center was performed. The cumulative radiation dose was recorded per stone episode, and the effective dose (ED) then calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association between ED and patient, stone, and procedural characteristics.Between January 2020 and December 2021, 250 patients underwent endoscopic intervention for urolithiasis; 71% (n = 178) were male with a median age of 48 years (IQR 35-59). The median stone size was 6 mm (IQR, 5-8 mm) and the median stone volume was 110 mm3 (IQR, 60-206 mm3). Most stones were located in the distal ureter (46%, n = 114). The median ED received per stone episode was 3.99 mSv (IQR 2.9-7 mSv). On multivariable analysis, BMI, number of CT scans performed, CT protocol used, and repeat procedures strongly predicted increased radiation dose (p < 0.01).It is important for urologists to consider the cumulative radiation dosage in patients with urolithiasis. Strategies to minimize exposure, such as avoiding re-imaging, low-dose CTs, and collimation of the region of interest with judicious magnification, should be considered during treatment.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.