Secondary anti-viral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients for the prevention of cytomegalovirus relapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
David Moynan, Eibhlin Higgins, Matteo Passerini, Larry J Prokop, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Raymund R Razonable
{"title":"Secondary anti-viral prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients for the prevention of cytomegalovirus relapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"David Moynan, Eibhlin Higgins, Matteo Passerini, Larry J Prokop, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Raymund R Razonable","doi":"10.1111/tid.14393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Secondary prophylaxis (SP) is not routinely recommended by guidelines on the management of CMV in SOTR but may be considered in certain higher-risk situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of English language publications up to September 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was CMV relapse, defined as the recurrence of DNAemia or disease. Secondary outcomes included graft loss, mortality, and hematological toxicity. Meta-analysis used the random-effects model. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022357028).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six retrospective comparative studies were included. A total of 520/727 (72%) of SOTR received SP with valganciclovir. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in CMV relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.63). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.57). SP was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.54) but not graft loss (OR 0.67, 0.17-2.63). There was no significant difference in CMV relapse among kidney-specific SOTR (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.65-2.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence from six nonrandomized studies is limited and cannot support a recommendation for or against routine SP in SOTR treated for CMV infection. Awaiting prospective-controlled trials, the decision about SP should depend on individualized risk-profile assessments by experienced clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Secondary prophylaxis (SP) is not routinely recommended by guidelines on the management of CMV in SOTR but may be considered in certain higher-risk situations.

Methods: A comprehensive search of English language publications up to September 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was CMV relapse, defined as the recurrence of DNAemia or disease. Secondary outcomes included graft loss, mortality, and hematological toxicity. Meta-analysis used the random-effects model. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42022357028).

Results: Six retrospective comparative studies were included. A total of 520/727 (72%) of SOTR received SP with valganciclovir. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in CMV relapse (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.63). Heterogeneity between the studies was low (I2 = 0%, p = 0.57). SP was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.54) but not graft loss (OR 0.67, 0.17-2.63). There was no significant difference in CMV relapse among kidney-specific SOTR (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.65-2.96).

Conclusion: Evidence from six nonrandomized studies is limited and cannot support a recommendation for or against routine SP in SOTR treated for CMV infection. Awaiting prospective-controlled trials, the decision about SP should depend on individualized risk-profile assessments by experienced clinicians.

对实体器官移植受者进行二次抗病毒预防以防止巨细胞病毒复发:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV巨细胞病毒(CMV)是导致实体器官移植受者(SOTR)发病和死亡的重要原因。二次预防(SP)并非实体器官移植受者CMV管理指南的常规建议,但在某些高风险情况下可以考虑使用:对截至 2023 年 9 月的英文文献进行了全面检索。主要结果是CMV复发,即DNA血症或疾病复发。次要结果包括移植物丢失、死亡率和血液毒性。元分析采用随机效应模型。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册(编号:CRD42022357028):结果:共纳入六项回顾性比较研究。共有 520/727 例(72%)SOTR 患者接受了缬更昔洛韦 SP 治疗。荟萃分析未显示 CMV 复发率有显著差异(几率比 [OR] 1.15,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.79-2.63)。研究之间的异质性较低(I2 = 0%,P = 0.57)。SP与死亡率下降(OR 0.2,95% CI 0.07-0.54)明显相关,但与移植物损失(OR 0.67,0.17-2.63)无关。肾脏特异性SOTR与CMV复发无明显差异(OR 1.38,95% CI 0.65-2.96):六项非随机研究提供的证据有限,无法支持对接受CMV感染治疗的SOTR进行常规SP治疗或反对常规SP治疗的建议。在等待前瞻性对照试验的过程中,应由经验丰富的临床医生根据个体化的风险评估来决定是否使用 SP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信