Photosynthetic temperature responses in leaves and canopies: why temperature optima may disagree at different scales.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Dushan P Kumarathunge, Belinda E Medlyn, John E Drake, Martin G De Kauwe, Mark G Tjoelker, Michael J Aspinwall, Craig V M Barton, Courtney E Campany, Kristine Y Crous, Jinyan Yang, Mingkai Jiang
{"title":"Photosynthetic temperature responses in leaves and canopies: why temperature optima may disagree at different scales.","authors":"Dushan P Kumarathunge, Belinda E Medlyn, John E Drake, Martin G De Kauwe, Mark G Tjoelker, Michael J Aspinwall, Craig V M Barton, Courtney E Campany, Kristine Y Crous, Jinyan Yang, Mingkai Jiang","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpae135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how canopy-scale photosynthesis responds to temperature is of paramount importance for realistic prediction of the likely impact of climate change on forest growth. The effects of temperature on leaf-scale photosynthesis have been extensively documented but data demonstrating the temperature response of canopy-scale photosynthesis are relatively rare, and the mechanisms that determine the response are not well quantified. Here, we compared leaf- and canopy-scale photosynthesis responses to temperature measured in a whole-tree chamber experiment and tested mechanisms that could explain the difference between leaf and crown scale temperature optima for photosynthesis. We hypothesised that 1) there is a large contribution of non-light saturated leaves to total crown photosynthesis; 2) photosynthetic component processes vary vertically through the canopy following the gradient in incident light; and 3) seasonal temperature acclimation of photosynthetic biochemistry has a significant role in determining the overall temperature response of canopy photosynthesis. We tested these hypotheses using three models of canopy radiation interception and photosynthesis parameterized with leaf-level physiological data and estimates of canopy leaf area. Our results identified the influence of non-light saturated leaves as a key determinant of the lower temperature optimum of canopy photosynthesis, which reduced the temperature optimum of canopy photosynthesis by 6-8 °C compared to the leaf scale. Further, we demonstrate the importance of accounting for within-canopy variation and seasonal temperature acclimation of photosynthetic biochemistry in determining the magnitude of canopy photosynthesis. Overall, our study identifies key processes that need to be incorporated in terrestrial biosphere models to accurately predict temperature responses of whole-tree photosynthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how canopy-scale photosynthesis responds to temperature is of paramount importance for realistic prediction of the likely impact of climate change on forest growth. The effects of temperature on leaf-scale photosynthesis have been extensively documented but data demonstrating the temperature response of canopy-scale photosynthesis are relatively rare, and the mechanisms that determine the response are not well quantified. Here, we compared leaf- and canopy-scale photosynthesis responses to temperature measured in a whole-tree chamber experiment and tested mechanisms that could explain the difference between leaf and crown scale temperature optima for photosynthesis. We hypothesised that 1) there is a large contribution of non-light saturated leaves to total crown photosynthesis; 2) photosynthetic component processes vary vertically through the canopy following the gradient in incident light; and 3) seasonal temperature acclimation of photosynthetic biochemistry has a significant role in determining the overall temperature response of canopy photosynthesis. We tested these hypotheses using three models of canopy radiation interception and photosynthesis parameterized with leaf-level physiological data and estimates of canopy leaf area. Our results identified the influence of non-light saturated leaves as a key determinant of the lower temperature optimum of canopy photosynthesis, which reduced the temperature optimum of canopy photosynthesis by 6-8 °C compared to the leaf scale. Further, we demonstrate the importance of accounting for within-canopy variation and seasonal temperature acclimation of photosynthetic biochemistry in determining the magnitude of canopy photosynthesis. Overall, our study identifies key processes that need to be incorporated in terrestrial biosphere models to accurately predict temperature responses of whole-tree photosynthesis.

叶片和树冠的光合温度反应:为什么不同尺度的最适温度可能不同?
了解树冠层光合作用如何对温度做出反应,对于切实预测气候变化可能对森林生长产生的影响至关重要。温度对叶片尺度光合作用的影响已被广泛记录,但证明冠层尺度光合作用对温度响应的数据却相对罕见,而且决定这种响应的机制也没有被很好地量化。在这里,我们比较了叶片尺度和树冠尺度光合作用对全树室实验所测温度的响应,并检验了可以解释叶片尺度和树冠尺度光合作用最适温度之间差异的机制。我们的假设是:1)非光饱和叶片对树冠总光合作用的贡献很大;2)光合作用组分过程随入射光的梯度在树冠上垂直变化;3)光合作用生物化学的季节性温度适应在决定树冠光合作用的总体温度响应方面起着重要作用。我们使用三个冠层辐射截获和光合作用模型对上述假设进行了检验,这些模型的参数化采用了叶片级生理数据和冠层叶面积估计值。我们的结果表明,非光照饱和叶片的影响是树冠光合作用较低最适温度的关键决定因素,与叶片尺度相比,它使树冠光合作用的最适温度降低了 6-8 °C。此外,我们还证明了考虑冠层内部差异和光合生物化学的季节性温度适应在决定冠层光合作用大小方面的重要性。总之,我们的研究确定了需要纳入陆地生物圈模型的关键过程,以准确预测整棵树光合作用的温度响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信