Laparoscopic repair of gastric conduit obstruction after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a case report.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Toshiyuki Moriuchi, Yuki Katsura, Yasuhiro Shirakawa, Ayane Uehara, Kazuki Matsubara, Michihiro Ishida, Yasuhiro Choda, Hiroaki Mashima, Hiroyuki Sawada, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa, Shigehiro Shiozaki
{"title":"Laparoscopic repair of gastric conduit obstruction after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a case report.","authors":"Toshiyuki Moriuchi, Yuki Katsura, Yasuhiro Shirakawa, Ayane Uehara, Kazuki Matsubara, Michihiro Ishida, Yasuhiro Choda, Hiroaki Mashima, Hiroyuki Sawada, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa, Shigehiro Shiozaki","doi":"10.1186/s40792-024-02038-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric conduit obstruction (GCO) is a known complication after esophagectomy. Laparoscopic revision surgery for GCO is relatively rare, with limited reports in the literature. Here, we report a case of GCO after robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy and posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 66-year-old man presented with a passage disorder that became noticeable 14 months after surgery. Fluid passage was difficult, and the patient opted for revision surgery. The conduit had entered and deflected into the mediastinum; it also twisted due to band formation. The revision surgery was performed laparoscopically through five ports. The bands were dissected, esophageal hiatus was sutured, and conduit re-fixed. The intraoperative endoscopy was used to confirm that the obstruction had been released. The lack of adhesion of the posterior half of the gastric conduit wall, combined with postoperative weight loss leading to a decrease in omental volume, as well as inadequate fixation during the initial surgery, are believed to have contributed to the ease of the conduit deviation into the intrathoracic cavity. In addition, the twisting of the conduit due to band formation exacerbated the obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic revision surgery may become an effective treatment option as the number of minimally invasive esophagectomies is expected to increase in the future. Furthermore, the fixation method during initial surgery should be carefully considered and optimized to prevent gastric conduit obstruction. Additionally, the use of intraoperative endoscopy to evaluate the lumen of the conduit during surgery proved beneficial in this case, highlighting its potential value in identifying and addressing obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22096,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Case Reports","volume":"10 1","pages":"236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-024-02038-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric conduit obstruction (GCO) is a known complication after esophagectomy. Laparoscopic revision surgery for GCO is relatively rare, with limited reports in the literature. Here, we report a case of GCO after robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy and posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically.

Case presentation: A 66-year-old man presented with a passage disorder that became noticeable 14 months after surgery. Fluid passage was difficult, and the patient opted for revision surgery. The conduit had entered and deflected into the mediastinum; it also twisted due to band formation. The revision surgery was performed laparoscopically through five ports. The bands were dissected, esophageal hiatus was sutured, and conduit re-fixed. The intraoperative endoscopy was used to confirm that the obstruction had been released. The lack of adhesion of the posterior half of the gastric conduit wall, combined with postoperative weight loss leading to a decrease in omental volume, as well as inadequate fixation during the initial surgery, are believed to have contributed to the ease of the conduit deviation into the intrathoracic cavity. In addition, the twisting of the conduit due to band formation exacerbated the obstruction.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic revision surgery may become an effective treatment option as the number of minimally invasive esophagectomies is expected to increase in the future. Furthermore, the fixation method during initial surgery should be carefully considered and optimized to prevent gastric conduit obstruction. Additionally, the use of intraoperative endoscopy to evaluate the lumen of the conduit during surgery proved beneficial in this case, highlighting its potential value in identifying and addressing obstruction.

机器人辅助微创食管切除术后胃导管梗阻的腹腔镜修复:病例报告。
背景:胃导管梗阻(GCO)是食管切除术后的一种已知并发症。针对 GCO 的腹腔镜翻修手术相对罕见,文献报道有限。在此,我们报告了一例机器人辅助食管次全切除术和后纵隔胃导管重建术后的 GCO 病例,该病例在腹腔镜下成功修复:一名 66 岁的男性在手术后 14 个月出现明显的通道障碍。液体通过困难,患者选择了翻修手术。导管已进入纵隔并发生偏转;导管还因形成带状而扭曲。翻修手术在腹腔镜下通过五个孔进行。剥离带子,缝合食管裂孔,重新固定导管。术中通过内窥镜检查确认梗阻已经解除。胃导管后半壁缺乏粘连,加上术后体重减轻导致网膜体积减少,以及初次手术时固定不当,这些因素被认为是导管容易偏离胸腔内的原因。此外,腹带形成导致的导管扭曲也加剧了梗阻:腹腔镜翻修手术可能会成为一种有效的治疗方法,因为预计未来微创食管切除术的数量将会增加。此外,初次手术时的固定方法应仔细考虑并优化,以防止胃导管阻塞。此外,在本病例中,术中使用内窥镜评估手术过程中的导管管腔证明是有益的,突出了其在识别和解决梗阻方面的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信