Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tillier Cn, Cox Il, Hagens Mj, Nicolai Mpj, van Muilekom Ham, van Leeuwen Pj, van de Poll-Franse Lv, van der Poel Hg
{"title":"Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Tillier Cn, Cox Il, Hagens Mj, Nicolai Mpj, van Muilekom Ham, van Leeuwen Pj, van de Poll-Franse Lv, van der Poel Hg","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08936-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) impairs erectile function (EF) due to the surgical procedure and non-surgical factors. Non-surgical factors may contribute to recovery of erectile function (EFR) after RARP. This study assessed the role of non-surgical factors including physical activity in baseline EF and EFR after prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient Reported Measure Outcomes questionnaires from patients with localized prostate carcinoma who underwent a RARP with a postoperative follow up (FU) of 3 years. EFR was defined as at least 70% EF recovery of baseline IIEF-EF. Physical activities was defined as no activity at all, once a week and ≥ 2 a week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 804 patients were included. At baseline, age, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), having a partner and former smoking were significantly associated (p < .001) of EF. Postoperatively, the extent of nerve sparing and baseline EF were strongly associated with EFR (p < .001). Physical activity ≥ 2 a week predicted EF but only beyond 6 months of FU (p = .005, p = .028 and p = .007 at 1, 2 and 3 year FU respectively). Comorbidities, BMI and the use of medications known to affect EF were not predictive of EFR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age, LUTS, having a partner and former smoking were baseline associated with EF prior to RARP. Baseline EF and extent of nerve sparing jointly predicted EFR. Intensive physical activity was an independent predictor of EFR beyond the first year after RARP. Our findings suggests that besides clinical factors, lifestyle may also play a role in recovery of erectile function.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 11","pages":"738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08936-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) impairs erectile function (EF) due to the surgical procedure and non-surgical factors. Non-surgical factors may contribute to recovery of erectile function (EFR) after RARP. This study assessed the role of non-surgical factors including physical activity in baseline EF and EFR after prostatectomy.

Methods: Patient Reported Measure Outcomes questionnaires from patients with localized prostate carcinoma who underwent a RARP with a postoperative follow up (FU) of 3 years. EFR was defined as at least 70% EF recovery of baseline IIEF-EF. Physical activities was defined as no activity at all, once a week and ≥ 2 a week.

Results: In total 804 patients were included. At baseline, age, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), having a partner and former smoking were significantly associated (p < .001) of EF. Postoperatively, the extent of nerve sparing and baseline EF were strongly associated with EFR (p < .001). Physical activity ≥ 2 a week predicted EF but only beyond 6 months of FU (p = .005, p = .028 and p = .007 at 1, 2 and 3 year FU respectively). Comorbidities, BMI and the use of medications known to affect EF were not predictive of EFR.

Conclusions: Age, LUTS, having a partner and former smoking were baseline associated with EF prior to RARP. Baseline EF and extent of nerve sparing jointly predicted EFR. Intensive physical activity was an independent predictor of EFR beyond the first year after RARP. Our findings suggests that besides clinical factors, lifestyle may also play a role in recovery of erectile function.

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后长期勃起功能的手术和非手术预测因素。
目的:机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)会损害勃起功能(EF),这是手术过程和非手术因素造成的。非手术因素可能有助于 RARP 术后勃起功能(EFR)的恢复。本研究评估了包括体育锻炼在内的非手术因素在前列腺切除术后基线勃起功能和勃起功能恢复中的作用:方法:对接受前列腺切除术(RARP)的局部前列腺癌患者进行患者报告测量结果问卷调查,术后随访(FU)3年。EFR的定义是EF至少恢复基线IIEF-EF的70%。体力活动定义为完全不活动、每周一次和每周≥2次:结果:共纳入 804 名患者。在基线时,年龄、下尿路症状(LUTS)、有伴侣和曾经吸烟有显著相关性(p 结论:年龄、下尿路症状(LUTS)、有伴侣和曾经吸烟有显著相关性:年龄、下尿路症状(LUTS)、有伴侣和曾吸烟与 RARP 前的 EF 基线相关。基线 EF 和神经疏通程度共同预测了 EFR。强化体育锻炼是 RARP 术后第一年后 EFR 的独立预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,除了临床因素外,生活方式也可能对勃起功能的恢复起到一定作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信