Bidirectional association between frailty and quality of life within English longitudinal study of aging.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ali Alattas, Farag Shuweihdi, Kate Best, Silviya Nikolova, Robert West
{"title":"Bidirectional association between frailty and quality of life within English longitudinal study of aging.","authors":"Ali Alattas, Farag Shuweihdi, Kate Best, Silviya Nikolova, Robert West","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03809-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between quality of life (QoL) and frailty has previously been investigated cross-sectionally and longitudinally as unidirectional where QoL depends upon frailty and where frailty depends on QoL. Here a bidirectional relationship is examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work uses a latent curve model with structured residuals to address the bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older English people considering within-person and group levels. The study measures frailty using a functional frailty measure and quality of life using CASP-12. The sample size is 17,529.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a strong relationship between QoL (Quality of Life) and frailty, which is almost linear and inversely proportional over time. Although the cross-lagged coefficients from QoL to frailty and vice versa showed statistical significance, the impact was found to be minimal. The time between assessments (which are two years apart) and/or the few observations available per individual may have impacted the effect of this relationship. When accounting for gender, age, net wealth, and multimorbidity, some variations in the results were observed at the group level but not at the within-person level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides empirical evidence that supports a bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older individuals who reside at home. These results offer valuable insights for healthcare providers, as participants did not exhibit an advanced need for health services. Additionally, involving participants in evaluating and assessing these services enhances their effectiveness and overall benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03809-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between quality of life (QoL) and frailty has previously been investigated cross-sectionally and longitudinally as unidirectional where QoL depends upon frailty and where frailty depends on QoL. Here a bidirectional relationship is examined.

Methods: This work uses a latent curve model with structured residuals to address the bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older English people considering within-person and group levels. The study measures frailty using a functional frailty measure and quality of life using CASP-12. The sample size is 17,529.

Results: There is a strong relationship between QoL (Quality of Life) and frailty, which is almost linear and inversely proportional over time. Although the cross-lagged coefficients from QoL to frailty and vice versa showed statistical significance, the impact was found to be minimal. The time between assessments (which are two years apart) and/or the few observations available per individual may have impacted the effect of this relationship. When accounting for gender, age, net wealth, and multimorbidity, some variations in the results were observed at the group level but not at the within-person level.

Conclusion: The study provides empirical evidence that supports a bidirectional association between QoL and frailty in older individuals who reside at home. These results offer valuable insights for healthcare providers, as participants did not exhibit an advanced need for health services. Additionally, involving participants in evaluating and assessing these services enhances their effectiveness and overall benefit.

英国老龄化纵向研究中虚弱与生活质量之间的双向关联。
目的:以前曾对生活质量(QoL)与虚弱之间的关系进行过横向和纵向研究,认为两者之间存在单向关系,即生活质量取决于虚弱程度,而虚弱程度取决于生活质量。这里研究的是一种双向关系:本研究采用具有结构化残差的潜在曲线模型来研究英国老年人的 QoL 与虚弱之间的双向关系,同时考虑到个人和群体层面。研究使用功能性虚弱测量法测量虚弱程度,使用 CASP-12 测量生活质量。样本量为 17529 个:结果:QoL(生活质量)与虚弱之间存在密切关系,两者之间几乎呈线性关系,并随着时间的推移成反比。虽然从 QoL 到虚弱程度以及从虚弱程度到 QoL 的交叉滞后系数显示出统计学意义,但发现其影响微乎其微。评估之间的时间间隔(相隔两年)和/或每个人可用的观测数据较少可能会影响这种关系的效果。在考虑性别、年龄、净财富和多病症的情况下,在群体层面观察到的结果存在一些差异,但在个人层面则没有:本研究提供的经验证据支持了居家老年人的 QoL 与虚弱之间的双向关系。这些结果为医疗服务提供者提供了宝贵的见解,因为参与者并未表现出对医疗服务的高度需求。此外,让参与者参与评价和评估这些服务可提高服务的有效性和整体效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信