Film intervention increases empathic understanding of formerly incarcerated people and support for criminal justice reform.

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Marianne C Reddan, Sydney B Garcia, Golijeh Golarai, Jennifer L Eberhardt, Jamil Zaki
{"title":"Film intervention increases empathic understanding of formerly incarcerated people and support for criminal justice reform.","authors":"Marianne C Reddan, Sydney B Garcia, Golijeh Golarai, Jennifer L Eberhardt, Jamil Zaki","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2322819121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuanced portrayals of stigmatized groups in media have been shown to reduce prejudice. In an online experiment (N = 749), we tested whether a feature film depicting incarcerated peoples' experiences in the criminal justice system can increase a) empathic accuracy and compassion toward people who have been incarcerated and b) support for criminal justice reform. We measured baseline empathic accuracy via a well-validated task, where participants infer the emotions of people sharing stories about difficult life events. All storytellers were formerly incarcerated and students. However, in half the videos we labeled them as \"formerly incarcerated\" and in the remaining half as \"college student.\" We then surveyed people's baseline attitudes toward criminal justice reform. Next, we assigned participants to watch one of three films. The intervention film chronicled the true stories of Black men on death row. Two docudramas of similar length served as control films. Finally, participants completed the empathic accuracy task and survey again and were given the opportunity to sign a petition. Compared to those who watched a control film, participants who watched the intervention film more accurately inferred the emotions of storytellers labeled \"formerly incarcerated,\" and increased their support for criminal justice reform. These effects held for conservative and liberal participants alike. However, the film had no effect on feelings of compassion. Together, these results demonstrate the power of narrative interventions to not only increase empathic accuracy for members of a severely stigmatized group, but to increase support for reforms designed to improve their lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322819121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nuanced portrayals of stigmatized groups in media have been shown to reduce prejudice. In an online experiment (N = 749), we tested whether a feature film depicting incarcerated peoples' experiences in the criminal justice system can increase a) empathic accuracy and compassion toward people who have been incarcerated and b) support for criminal justice reform. We measured baseline empathic accuracy via a well-validated task, where participants infer the emotions of people sharing stories about difficult life events. All storytellers were formerly incarcerated and students. However, in half the videos we labeled them as "formerly incarcerated" and in the remaining half as "college student." We then surveyed people's baseline attitudes toward criminal justice reform. Next, we assigned participants to watch one of three films. The intervention film chronicled the true stories of Black men on death row. Two docudramas of similar length served as control films. Finally, participants completed the empathic accuracy task and survey again and were given the opportunity to sign a petition. Compared to those who watched a control film, participants who watched the intervention film more accurately inferred the emotions of storytellers labeled "formerly incarcerated," and increased their support for criminal justice reform. These effects held for conservative and liberal participants alike. However, the film had no effect on feelings of compassion. Together, these results demonstrate the power of narrative interventions to not only increase empathic accuracy for members of a severely stigmatized group, but to increase support for reforms designed to improve their lives.

电影干预增加了对曾被监禁者的感同身受的理解和对刑事司法改革的支持。
事实证明,在媒体中对被污名化群体进行细致入微的描绘可以减少偏见。在一项在线实验(N = 749)中,我们测试了一部描述被监禁者在刑事司法系统中经历的故事片是否能够提高 a) 对被监禁者的移情准确性和同情心,以及 b) 对刑事司法改革的支持。我们通过一项经过充分验证的任务来测量基线移情准确性,在这项任务中,参与者要推断出分享艰难生活事件故事的人的情绪。所有讲故事的人都曾是囚犯和学生。不过,在一半的视频中,我们将他们标注为 "曾被监禁",而在剩下的一半视频中,我们将他们标注为 "大学生"。然后,我们调查了人们对刑事司法改革的基本态度。接下来,我们分配参与者观看三部影片中的一部。干预电影记录了黑人死囚的真实故事。两部长度相似的纪录片作为对照影片。最后,参与者再次完成移情准确性任务和调查,并有机会在请愿书上签名。与观看对照影片的受试者相比,观看干预影片的受试者能更准确地推断出被贴上 "曾被监禁 "标签的故事讲述者的情绪,并增加了他们对刑事司法改革的支持。这些效果对保守派和自由派参与者同样适用。不过,影片对同情情绪没有影响。总之,这些结果证明了叙事干预的力量,它不仅能提高对一个被严重鄙视的群体成员的移情准确性,还能提高对旨在改善他们生活的改革的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信