Agreement between equation-derived body fat estimator and bioelectrical impedance analysis for body fat measurement in middle-aged southern Indians.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Chiranjeevi Kumar Endukuru, Girwar Singh Gaur, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Balasubramaniyan Vairappan
{"title":"Agreement between equation-derived body fat estimator and bioelectrical impedance analysis for body fat measurement in middle-aged southern Indians.","authors":"Chiranjeevi Kumar Endukuru, Girwar Singh Gaur, Dhanalakshmi Yerrabelli, Jayaprakash Sahoo, Balasubramaniyan Vairappan","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Excess body fat (BF) contributes to metabolic syndrome (MetS). The Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) is an equation-derived body fat estimator proposed to assess BF. However, its efficiency compared to the standard method is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy of CUN-BAE with the standard method in estimating BF in southern Indians. We included 351 subjects, with 166 MetS patients and 185 non-MetS subjects. BF was obtained from the standard bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method and measured by CUN-BAE in the same subjects. We compared the efficacy of CUN-BAE in estimating BF with that of BIA via Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients and the kappa index. The mean body fat percentage (BF%) values measured by BIA and CUN-BAE in all the subjects were 28.91 ± 8.94 and 29.22 ± 8.63, respectively. We observed significant absolute agreement between CUN-BAE and BIA for BF%. BIA and CUN-BAE showed good reproducibility for BF%. CUN-BAE had accuracy comparable to BIA for detecting MetS using BF%. Our findings indicate that CUN-BAE provides precise BF estimates similar to the BIA method, making it suitable for routine clinical practice when access to BF measurement devices is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 20","pages":"e70095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excess body fat (BF) contributes to metabolic syndrome (MetS). The Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) is an equation-derived body fat estimator proposed to assess BF. However, its efficiency compared to the standard method is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy of CUN-BAE with the standard method in estimating BF in southern Indians. We included 351 subjects, with 166 MetS patients and 185 non-MetS subjects. BF was obtained from the standard bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method and measured by CUN-BAE in the same subjects. We compared the efficacy of CUN-BAE in estimating BF with that of BIA via Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients, concordance correlation coefficients and the kappa index. The mean body fat percentage (BF%) values measured by BIA and CUN-BAE in all the subjects were 28.91 ± 8.94 and 29.22 ± 8.63, respectively. We observed significant absolute agreement between CUN-BAE and BIA for BF%. BIA and CUN-BAE showed good reproducibility for BF%. CUN-BAE had accuracy comparable to BIA for detecting MetS using BF%. Our findings indicate that CUN-BAE provides precise BF estimates similar to the BIA method, making it suitable for routine clinical practice when access to BF measurement devices is limited.

南方中年印度人体脂测量的方程推导体脂估算器与生物电阻抗分析之间的一致性。
体内脂肪过多(BF)是导致代谢综合征(MetS)的原因之一。纳瓦拉大学体脂估算器(CUN-BAE)是一种通过方程得出的体脂估算器,用于评估体脂。然而,与标准方法相比,它的效率尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较 CUN-BAE 与标准方法在估测南部印度人体脂率方面的功效。我们纳入了 351 名受试者,其中有 166 名 MetS 患者和 185 名非 MetS 受试者。在相同的受试者中,BF 是通过标准生物电阻抗分析 (BIA) 方法和 CUN-BAE 测量得出的。我们通过布兰德-阿尔特曼图、类内相关系数、一致性相关系数和卡帕指数比较了 CUN-BAE 和 BIA 估算体脂率的效果。所有受试者通过 BIA 和 CUN-BAE 测得的平均体脂百分比(BF%)值分别为 28.91 ± 8.94 和 29.22 ± 8.63。我们观察到 CUN-BAE 和 BIA 测量的体脂率绝对值非常一致。BIA 和 CUN-BAE 在 BF% 方面显示出良好的重现性。CUN-BAE使用BF%检测MetS的准确性与BIA相当。我们的研究结果表明,CUN-BAE 可提供与 BIA 方法类似的精确血流比率估计值,因此适合在血流比率测量设备有限的情况下用于常规临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信