Impact of social distancing policy on pediatric emergency ophthalmic severity during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Hyung Kyoo Woo, Seung Ah Chung, Hyelynn Jeon, Bumhee Park, Jung Heon Kim
{"title":"Impact of social distancing policy on pediatric emergency ophthalmic severity during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.","authors":"Hyung Kyoo Woo, Seung Ah Chung, Hyelynn Jeon, Bumhee Park, Jung Heon Kim","doi":"10.1111/ped.15845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the impact of social distancing policies (SDPs) on ophthalmic severity in children who underwent emergency ophthalmic referrals during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed all children with ophthalmic referrals in a single academic hospital emergency department during the period from February 2017 to December 2019 (prepandemic) or February 2020 to December 2022 (pandemic). Baseline features, diagnosis-based severity, and outcomes were compared between the two periods. The Government Response Stringency Index (GRSI), which ranges from 0 to 100, was used as a surrogate for the intensity of SDPs during the pandemic. Poisson regression was used to quantify the association of the GRSI with the severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1074 children with ophthalmic referrals, 437 (40.7%) visited during the pandemic. This was 31.4% lower than that during the prepandemic period. In numbers, pandemic-related declines were more modest in high severity than in medium-to-low severity (35.1% vs. 55.0%), and for injury than for illness (28.5% vs. 36.1%). In percentages, high severity increased from 63.3% to 71.3% (p = 0.016). The hospitalization rate increased from 1.7% to 3.9% (p = 0.029). For every 10-point increase in GRSI, there was a 20.0% decrease in high severity (95% confidence interval, 5%-30%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows an inverse association of SDPs with ophthalmic severity and an increase in severe cases along with consistent flow of injury cases, amid the overall decline in eye-related visits to the emergency department during the pandemic period.</p>","PeriodicalId":20039,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics International","volume":"66 1","pages":"e15845"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigated the impact of social distancing policies (SDPs) on ophthalmic severity in children who underwent emergency ophthalmic referrals during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period.

Methods: We reviewed all children with ophthalmic referrals in a single academic hospital emergency department during the period from February 2017 to December 2019 (prepandemic) or February 2020 to December 2022 (pandemic). Baseline features, diagnosis-based severity, and outcomes were compared between the two periods. The Government Response Stringency Index (GRSI), which ranges from 0 to 100, was used as a surrogate for the intensity of SDPs during the pandemic. Poisson regression was used to quantify the association of the GRSI with the severity.

Results: Among 1074 children with ophthalmic referrals, 437 (40.7%) visited during the pandemic. This was 31.4% lower than that during the prepandemic period. In numbers, pandemic-related declines were more modest in high severity than in medium-to-low severity (35.1% vs. 55.0%), and for injury than for illness (28.5% vs. 36.1%). In percentages, high severity increased from 63.3% to 71.3% (p = 0.016). The hospitalization rate increased from 1.7% to 3.9% (p = 0.029). For every 10-point increase in GRSI, there was a 20.0% decrease in high severity (95% confidence interval, 5%-30%).

Conclusions: This study shows an inverse association of SDPs with ophthalmic severity and an increase in severe cases along with consistent flow of injury cases, amid the overall decline in eye-related visits to the emergency department during the pandemic period.

在 2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间,社会距离政策对儿科急诊眼科严重程度的影响。
背景:我们研究了社会疏远政策(SDP)对2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间接受眼科急诊转诊的儿童眼病严重程度的影响:我们回顾了 2017 年 2 月至 2019 年 12 月(大流行前)或 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 12 月(大流行)期间在一家学术医院急诊科接受眼科转诊的所有儿童。对两个时期的基线特征、基于诊断的严重程度和结果进行了比较。政府应对严格指数(GRSI)介于 0 到 100 之间,被用作大流行期间 SDPs 强度的代用指标。波松回归用于量化政府应对严格指数与疫情严重程度之间的关系:在 1074 名眼科转诊儿童中,有 437 名(40.7%)在大流行期间就诊。这比大流行前减少了 31.4%。从人数上看,与大流行相关的人数减少在高度严重性方面比中低度严重性方面更为温和(35.1% 对 55.0%),受伤人数的减少也比患病人数的减少更为温和(28.5% 对 36.1%)。就百分比而言,严重程度高的从 63.3% 增加到 71.3%(p = 0.016)。住院率从 1.7% 上升到 3.9% (p = 0.029)。GRSI每增加10分,严重程度就会降低20.0%(95%置信区间,5%-30%):这项研究表明,SDPs 与眼科疾病的严重程度呈反向关系,在大流行期间,急诊科与眼科相关的就诊率总体下降,但严重病例和受伤病例却持续增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatrics International
Pediatrics International 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
519
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Publishing articles of scientific excellence in pediatrics and child health delivery, Pediatrics International aims to encourage those involved in the research, practice and delivery of child health to share their experiences, ideas and achievements. Formerly Acta Paediatrica Japonica, the change in name in 1999 to Pediatrics International, reflects the Journal''s international status both in readership and contributions (approximately 45% of articles published are from non-Japanese authors). The Editors continue their strong commitment to the sharing of scientific information for the benefit of children everywhere. Pediatrics International opens the door to all authors throughout the world. Manuscripts are judged by two experts solely upon the basis of their contribution of original data, original ideas and their presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信