Remote ischemic post-conditioning for neonatal encephalopathy: a safety and feasibility trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Emily Lo, Mehmet N Cizmeci, Diane Wilson, Linh G Ly, Amr El-Shahed, Martin Offringa, Agostino Pierro, Brian T Kalish
{"title":"Remote ischemic post-conditioning for neonatal encephalopathy: a safety and feasibility trial.","authors":"Emily Lo, Mehmet N Cizmeci, Diane Wilson, Linh G Ly, Amr El-Shahed, Martin Offringa, Agostino Pierro, Brian T Kalish","doi":"10.1038/s41390-024-03625-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite implementation of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE), a significant proportion of infants suffer neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a proposed neuroprotective maneuver that has been studied in adults with brain injury, but it has not been previously investigated in infants with NE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized, safety and dose escalation study in 32 neonates with NE. Four cohorts of consecutive patients were randomized to RIC therapy, including four cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion on progressive days of TH, or sham. Clinical, biochemical, and safety outcomes were monitored in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients received the designated RIC therapy without interruption or delay. RIC was not associated with increased pain, vascular, cutaneous, muscular, or neural safety events. There was no difference in the incidence of seizures, brain injury, or mortality between the two groups with the escalation of RIC dose and frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that RIC is a safe and feasible adjunctive therapy for neonates with NE undergoing TH.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This pilot study establishes critical safety and feasibility data that are necessary for the design of future studies to investigate the potential efficacy of RIC to reduce NDI.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a possible neuroprotective intervention in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). RIC can be administered concurrently with therapeutic hypothermia without any notable adverse events. Future studies will need to address potential efficacy of RIC to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes, as well as consider the ideal temporal window and dose for RIC in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03625-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite implementation of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE), a significant proportion of infants suffer neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a proposed neuroprotective maneuver that has been studied in adults with brain injury, but it has not been previously investigated in infants with NE.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, safety and dose escalation study in 32 neonates with NE. Four cohorts of consecutive patients were randomized to RIC therapy, including four cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion on progressive days of TH, or sham. Clinical, biochemical, and safety outcomes were monitored in both groups.

Results: All patients received the designated RIC therapy without interruption or delay. RIC was not associated with increased pain, vascular, cutaneous, muscular, or neural safety events. There was no difference in the incidence of seizures, brain injury, or mortality between the two groups with the escalation of RIC dose and frequency.

Conclusions: We found that RIC is a safe and feasible adjunctive therapy for neonates with NE undergoing TH.

Impact: This pilot study establishes critical safety and feasibility data that are necessary for the design of future studies to investigate the potential efficacy of RIC to reduce NDI.

Impact: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a possible neuroprotective intervention in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). RIC can be administered concurrently with therapeutic hypothermia without any notable adverse events. Future studies will need to address potential efficacy of RIC to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes, as well as consider the ideal temporal window and dose for RIC in this patient population.

新生儿脑病远程缺血后调节:安全性和可行性试验。
背景:尽管对患有新生儿脑病(NE)的婴儿实施了治疗性低温(TH),但仍有相当一部分婴儿患有神经发育障碍(NDI)。远程缺血调理(RIC)是一种拟议的神经保护方法,已在成人脑损伤患者中进行过研究,但此前尚未在患有新生儿脑病的婴儿中进行过研究:我们对 32 名 NE 新生儿进行了一项前瞻性、随机、安全性和剂量递增研究。四组连续的患者被随机分配接受 RIC 治疗,包括四个周期的肢体缺血,并在 TH 的渐进日进行再灌注,或接受假治疗。对两组患者的临床、生化和安全性结果进行了监测:结果:所有患者都接受了指定的 RIC 治疗,没有中断或延迟。RIC 与疼痛、血管、皮肤、肌肉或神经安全事件的增加无关。随着 RIC 剂量和频率的增加,两组患者的癫痫发作、脑损伤或死亡率也没有差异:我们发现,RIC 是一种安全可行的辅助疗法,适用于接受 TH 治疗的 NE 新生儿:这项试验性研究建立了关键的安全性和可行性数据,这些数据对于设计未来研究以调查 RIC 对减少 NDI 的潜在疗效是必要的:远程缺血调节(RIC)是缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)婴儿的一种可能的神经保护干预措施。远程缺血调理可与治疗性低温疗法同时进行,不会出现任何明显的不良反应。未来的研究将需要探讨 RIC 在改善神经发育结局方面的潜在疗效,并考虑 RIC 在这一患者群体中的理想时间窗口和剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信