Evaluation of Loopamp Leishmania detection kit for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Behailu Taye, Roma Melkamu, Fitsumbrhan Tajebe, Ana Victoria Ibarra-Meneses, Desalegn Adane, Saba Atnafu, Mohammed Adem, Gashaw Adane, Mekibib Kassa, Mezgebu Silamsaw Asres, Johan van Griensven, Saskia van Henten, Myrthe Pareyn
{"title":"Evaluation of Loopamp Leishmania detection kit for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia.","authors":"Behailu Taye, Roma Melkamu, Fitsumbrhan Tajebe, Ana Victoria Ibarra-Meneses, Desalegn Adane, Saba Atnafu, Mohammed Adem, Gashaw Adane, Mekibib Kassa, Mezgebu Silamsaw Asres, Johan van Griensven, Saskia van Henten, Myrthe Pareyn","doi":"10.1186/s13071-024-06475-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ethiopia and some parts of Kenya is predominantly caused by Leishmania aethiopica. While skin-slit (SS) microscopy is routinely used for CL diagnosis, more sensitive molecular tests are available. The Loopamp™ Leishmania detection kit (Loopamp) is a robust loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with the potential for implementation in primary healthcare facilities. In this study, we comparatively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of four methods currently used to diagnose CL: Loopamp, kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) PCR, spliced leader RNA (SL-RNA) PCR and SS microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study on 122 stored tape disc samples of suspected CL patients was conducted in Gondar, northwestern Ethiopia. Routine SS microscopy results were obtained from all patients. Total nucleic acids were extracted from the tapes and subjected to PCR testing targeting kDNA and SL-RNA, and Loopamp. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated with SS microscopy as a reference test. The limit of detection (LoD) of Loopamp and kDNA PCR were determined for cultured L. aethiopica and Leishmania donovani.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 122 patients, 64 (52.5%) were identified as CL cases based on SS microscopy. Although the PCR tests showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.6-99.1), Loopamp only had 48.4% (95% CI 39.6-57.3) sensitivity and 87.9% (95% CI 82.1-93.7) specificity. The LoD of Loopamp for L. donovani was 100-fold lower (20 fg/µl) than that for L. aethiopica (2 pg/µl).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Loopamp™ Leishmania detection kit is not suitable for the diagnosis of CL in Ethiopia, presumably due to a primer mismatch with the L. aethiopica 18S rRNA target. Further research is needed to develop a simple and sensitive point-of-care test that allows the decentralization of CL diagnosis in Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"17 1","pages":"431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06475-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ethiopia and some parts of Kenya is predominantly caused by Leishmania aethiopica. While skin-slit (SS) microscopy is routinely used for CL diagnosis, more sensitive molecular tests are available. The Loopamp™ Leishmania detection kit (Loopamp) is a robust loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with the potential for implementation in primary healthcare facilities. In this study, we comparatively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of four methods currently used to diagnose CL: Loopamp, kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) PCR, spliced leader RNA (SL-RNA) PCR and SS microscopy.

Methods: A study on 122 stored tape disc samples of suspected CL patients was conducted in Gondar, northwestern Ethiopia. Routine SS microscopy results were obtained from all patients. Total nucleic acids were extracted from the tapes and subjected to PCR testing targeting kDNA and SL-RNA, and Loopamp. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated with SS microscopy as a reference test. The limit of detection (LoD) of Loopamp and kDNA PCR were determined for cultured L. aethiopica and Leishmania donovani.

Results: Of the 122 patients, 64 (52.5%) were identified as CL cases based on SS microscopy. Although the PCR tests showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.6-99.1), Loopamp only had 48.4% (95% CI 39.6-57.3) sensitivity and 87.9% (95% CI 82.1-93.7) specificity. The LoD of Loopamp for L. donovani was 100-fold lower (20 fg/µl) than that for L. aethiopica (2 pg/µl).

Conclusions: The Loopamp™ Leishmania detection kit is not suitable for the diagnosis of CL in Ethiopia, presumably due to a primer mismatch with the L. aethiopica 18S rRNA target. Further research is needed to develop a simple and sensitive point-of-care test that allows the decentralization of CL diagnosis in Ethiopia.

评估用于诊断埃塞俄比亚皮肤利什曼病的 Loopamp 利什曼病检测试剂盒。
背景:在埃塞俄比亚和肯尼亚的一些地区,皮肤利什曼病(CL)主要是由Leishmania aethiopica引起的。虽然皮肤裂隙(SS)显微镜是诊断皮肤利什曼病的常规方法,但也有更灵敏的分子检测方法。Loopamp™ 利什曼病检测试剂盒(Loopamp)是一种可靠的环路介导等温扩增(LAMP)检测方法,有可能在基层医疗机构中使用。在这项研究中,我们比较评估了目前用于诊断 CL 的四种方法的诊断准确性:Loopamp、动原 DNA (kDNA) PCR、剪接头 RNA (SL-RNA) PCR 和 SS 显微镜:在埃塞俄比亚西北部的贡达尔对 122 份储存的疑似 CL 患者的磁带盘样本进行了研究。所有患者均获得了常规 SS 显微镜检查结果。从磁带中提取总核酸,针对 kDNA、SL-RNA 和 Loopamp 进行 PCR 检测。以 SS 显微镜检验作为参照检验,计算诊断准确率。测定了Loopamp和kDNA聚合酶链反应对培养出的aethiopica利什曼原虫和多诺万利什曼原虫的检测限(LoD):结果:在 122 例患者中,64 例(52.5%)根据 SS 显微镜检查被确定为 CL 病例。虽然 PCR 检测的灵敏度为 95.3%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 91.6-99.1),但 Loopamp 的灵敏度仅为 48.4%(95% 置信区间 39.6-57.3),特异性为 87.9%(95% 置信区间 82.1-93.7)。Loopamp对唐诺沃尼氏菌的LoD(20 fg/µl)比对埃蒂奥皮卡氏菌的LoD(2 pg/µl)低100倍:结论:Loopamp™利什曼病检测试剂盒不适合在埃塞俄比亚诊断CL,这可能是由于引物与L. aethiopica 18S rRNA靶标不匹配。需要进一步研究开发一种简单灵敏的护理点检测试剂盒,以便在埃塞俄比亚分散诊断利什曼病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish. Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信