Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching From Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Among Adults With Virologically Suppressed HIV: The DYAD Study.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae560
Charlotte-Paige Rolle, Jamie Castano, Vu Nguyen, Federico Hinestrosa, Edwin DeJesus
{"title":"Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Switching From Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Among Adults With Virologically Suppressed HIV: The DYAD Study.","authors":"Charlotte-Paige Rolle, Jamie Castano, Vu Nguyen, Federico Hinestrosa, Edwin DeJesus","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In TANGO and SALSA, switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing a baseline regimen among adults who were treatment experienced, although few switched from bictegravir (B) / emtricitabine (F) / tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Here, we present the efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC as compared with continuing with B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DYAD is an open-label clinical trial that randomized adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and no prior virologic failure (2:1) to switch to once-daily fixed-dose DTG/3TC or maintain B/F/TAF. The primary end point is the proportion with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm, intention-to-treat exposed population, 6% noninferiority margin).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 222 adults were randomized (16% women, 51% aged ≥50 years, 28% Black). At week 48, 6 (4%) with DTG/3TC and 5 (7%) with B/F/TAF had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (treatment difference, -2.8%; 95% CI, -11.4% to 3.1%), meeting noninferiority criteria. Through week 48, 18 participants (12 with DTG/3TC, 6 with B/F/TAF) met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria, and 2 of 18 had resistance: 1 with B/F/TAF developed M184M/I and G140G/S at week 12, and 1 with DTG/3TC had M184V at week 12. One participant with DTG/3TC and non-CVW developed M184V and K65R at week 12. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals due to AEs occurred in 31 (21%) and 6 (4%) participants with DTG/3TC and 2 (3%) and 0 participants with B/F/TAF, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to DTG/3TC was noninferior to continuing B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression at week 48. Drug-related AEs and withdrawals were higher in the DTG/3TC arm, which is likely consistent with the open-label nature of this switch study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 10","pages":"ofae560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In TANGO and SALSA, switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing a baseline regimen among adults who were treatment experienced, although few switched from bictegravir (B) / emtricitabine (F) / tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Here, we present the efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC as compared with continuing with B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression.

Methods: DYAD is an open-label clinical trial that randomized adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and no prior virologic failure (2:1) to switch to once-daily fixed-dose DTG/3TC or maintain B/F/TAF. The primary end point is the proportion with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm, intention-to-treat exposed population, 6% noninferiority margin).

Results: Overall, 222 adults were randomized (16% women, 51% aged ≥50 years, 28% Black). At week 48, 6 (4%) with DTG/3TC and 5 (7%) with B/F/TAF had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (treatment difference, -2.8%; 95% CI, -11.4% to 3.1%), meeting noninferiority criteria. Through week 48, 18 participants (12 with DTG/3TC, 6 with B/F/TAF) met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria, and 2 of 18 had resistance: 1 with B/F/TAF developed M184M/I and G140G/S at week 12, and 1 with DTG/3TC had M184V at week 12. One participant with DTG/3TC and non-CVW developed M184V and K65R at week 12. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals due to AEs occurred in 31 (21%) and 6 (4%) participants with DTG/3TC and 2 (3%) and 0 participants with B/F/TAF, respectively.

Conclusions: Switching to DTG/3TC was noninferior to continuing B/F/TAF among adults with virologic suppression at week 48. Drug-related AEs and withdrawals were higher in the DTG/3TC arm, which is likely consistent with the open-label nature of this switch study.

在病毒学抑制的 HIV 感染者中,从 Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide 转用 Dolutegravir/Lamivudine 的疗效、安全性和耐受性:DYAD研究。
背景:在TANGO和SALSA研究中,在有治疗经验的成年人中,改用多鲁曲韦/拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)并不比继续使用基线治疗方案效果差,但从比特拉韦(B)/恩曲他滨(F)/替诺福韦-阿拉非胺(TAF)改用DTG/3TC的人很少。在此,我们介绍了在病毒学抑制的成人中,与继续服用 B/F/ TAF 相比,改用 DTG/3TC 的疗效和安全性:DYAD是一项开放标签临床试验,对HIV-1 RNA检测结果为阳性的成人进行随机分组:共有 222 名成人接受了随机试验(16% 为女性,51% 年龄≥50 岁,28% 为黑人)。第48周时,6名(4%)DTG/3TC患者和5名(7%)B/F/TAF患者的HIV-1 RNA≥50拷贝/毫升(治疗差异,-2.8%;95% CI,-11.4%至3.1%),符合非劣效性标准。在第48周,18名参与者(12名接受DTG/3TC治疗,6名接受B/F/TAF治疗)达到了确诊病毒学退出(CVW)标准,18人中有2人出现耐药性:1名接受B/F/TAF治疗的患者在第12周出现M184M/I和G140G/S,1名接受DTG/3TC治疗的患者在第12周出现M184V。一名服用 DTG/3TC 和非 CVW 的参试者在第 12 周时出现了 M184V 和 K65R。31名(21%)和6名(4%)服用DTG/3TC的参与者以及2名(3%)和0名服用B/F/TAF的参与者发生了与药物相关的不良事件(AEs)并因AEs而退出:在第 48 周病毒学抑制的成人中,转用 DTG/3TC 疗效并不优于继续使用 B/F/TAF。DTG/3TC治疗组的药物相关AE和撤药率较高,这可能与该转换研究的开放标签性质相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信