Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear-bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Simulated Carious Dentin.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
W T Koh, O T Yeoh, N A Yahya, A U Yap
{"title":"Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear-bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cements to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Simulated Carious Dentin.","authors":"W T Koh, O T Yeoh, N A Yahya, A U Yap","doi":"10.2341/23-161-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure modes of self-cured (SC) and light-cured (LC) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (HVGICs) to silver diamine fluoride (SDF)-treated simulated carious dentin (SCD).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Extracted human premolars were sectioned and pH cycled for 10 days to simulate carious dentin. The demineralized specimens were treated with 38% SDF (Riva Star) for 2 minutes, washed, stored in deionized distilled water at 37°C for 2 weeks, and subjected to the following surface treatments (n=14): T1 - no treatment (control); T2 - 10 seconds polyacrylic acid (PAA); T3 - 5 seconds phosphoric acid (PPA); T4 - 5 seconds PPA plus universal adhesive (Zipbond); and T5 - 5 seconds PPA plus resin-modified GIC adhesive (Riva bond LC). SC (Riva Self-cure HV) and LC (Riva Light-cure HV) HVGICs were applied to the conditioned specimens and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 1 week. SBS and failure modes were subsequently determined. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis/post-hoc Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest SBS was observed when SC and LC were restored with T2 and T5, respectively. Significant differences in SBS were as follows: SC - T2, T1 > T5, T3; LC - T5, T4, T3 > T2. SC generally exhibited adhesive failures, while LC presented both adhesive and mixed failures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preferred method for preparing SDF-treated carious dentin before restoration application is PAA for SC and PPA plus RMGIC adhesive for LC HVGICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"714-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-161-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure modes of self-cured (SC) and light-cured (LC) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (HVGICs) to silver diamine fluoride (SDF)-treated simulated carious dentin (SCD).

Methods and materials: Extracted human premolars were sectioned and pH cycled for 10 days to simulate carious dentin. The demineralized specimens were treated with 38% SDF (Riva Star) for 2 minutes, washed, stored in deionized distilled water at 37°C for 2 weeks, and subjected to the following surface treatments (n=14): T1 - no treatment (control); T2 - 10 seconds polyacrylic acid (PAA); T3 - 5 seconds phosphoric acid (PPA); T4 - 5 seconds PPA plus universal adhesive (Zipbond); and T5 - 5 seconds PPA plus resin-modified GIC adhesive (Riva bond LC). SC (Riva Self-cure HV) and LC (Riva Light-cure HV) HVGICs were applied to the conditioned specimens and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 1 week. SBS and failure modes were subsequently determined. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis/post-hoc Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests (α=0.05).

Results: The highest SBS was observed when SC and LC were restored with T2 and T5, respectively. Significant differences in SBS were as follows: SC - T2, T1 > T5, T3; LC - T5, T4, T3 > T2. SC generally exhibited adhesive failures, while LC presented both adhesive and mixed failures.

Conclusion: The preferred method for preparing SDF-treated carious dentin before restoration application is PAA for SC and PPA plus RMGIC adhesive for LC HVGICs.

表面处理对玻璃离子黏结剂与二胺氟化银处理过的模拟龋齿牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响
研究目的本研究调查了不同的表面处理对自固化(SC)和光固化(LC)高粘度玻璃离聚体水门汀(HVGIC)与二胺氟化银(SDF)处理的模拟龋坏牙本质(SCD)的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和破坏模式的影响:对拔出的人类前臼齿进行切片,并进行为期 10 天的 pH 循环以模拟龋坏牙本质。用 38% SDF(Riva Star)处理脱矿标本 2 分钟,洗净,在 37°C 的去离子蒸馏水中保存 2 周,然后进行以下表面处理(n=14):T1 - 无处理(对照);T2 - 10 秒钟聚丙烯酸(PAA);T3 - 5 秒钟磷酸(PPA);T4 - 5 秒钟 PPA 加通用粘合剂(Zipbond);T5 - 5 秒钟 PPA 加树脂改性 GIC 粘合剂(Riva bond LC)。将 SC(丽娃自固化 HV)和 LC(丽娃光固化 HV)HVGIC 应用于条件试样,并在 37°C 人工唾液中保存 1 周。随后测定 SBS 和失效模式。统计分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis/post-hoc Mann-Whitney U 和 Chi-square 检验(α=0.05):分别用 T2 和 T5 恢复 SC 和 LC 时,观察到的 SBS 最高。SBS 的显著差异如下SC - T2、T1 > T5、T3;LC - T5、T4、T3 > T2。SC 通常表现为粘合失效,而 LC 则同时表现为粘合和混合失效:结论:在应用修复体之前,SDF 处理过的龋坏牙本质的首选制备方法是用于 SC 的 PAA 和用于 LC HVGIC 的 PPA 加 RMGIC 粘合剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative dentistry
Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信