Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine: Departmental Perspectives, Implementation Strategies, and Keys to Success.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200383
Barbara G Vickrey, Augustin C Rubio, Matthew J Stowe, Tasha Ostendorf, Clifton L Gooch
{"title":"Service Lines, Neurology, and Academic Medicine: Departmental Perspectives, Implementation Strategies, and Keys to Success.","authors":"Barbara G Vickrey, Augustin C Rubio, Matthew J Stowe, Tasha Ostendorf, Clifton L Gooch","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Service lines are increasingly common for organizing multidisciplinary patient care. Concerns regarding impacts of neuroscience service lines were voiced at several national neurology department chair summits, prompting the American Academy of Neurology to convene a Service Lines Workgroup. Neurology department leaders nationally at institutions that had created or considered a neuroscience service line were interviewed to elicit their experiences and lessons learned. Potential benefits identified stemmed from additional resources that the service line structure yielded (patient navigators, quality improvement staff, technicians) and strengthening of cross-department collaboration. Potential pitfalls included top-down institutional decision-making regarding service line creation, lack of explicit goals, late involvement of neurology, imbalances in neurology representation in leadership, unclear impacts on department finances, and lack of education and research mission integration into service lines. Establishing a satisfactory decision-making structure in a matrixed arrangement and ensuring that funds flow allocations acknowledged neurology's \"upstream\" contributions were also challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Service lines are increasingly common for organizing multidisciplinary patient care. Concerns regarding impacts of neuroscience service lines were voiced at several national neurology department chair summits, prompting the American Academy of Neurology to convene a Service Lines Workgroup. Neurology department leaders nationally at institutions that had created or considered a neuroscience service line were interviewed to elicit their experiences and lessons learned. Potential benefits identified stemmed from additional resources that the service line structure yielded (patient navigators, quality improvement staff, technicians) and strengthening of cross-department collaboration. Potential pitfalls included top-down institutional decision-making regarding service line creation, lack of explicit goals, late involvement of neurology, imbalances in neurology representation in leadership, unclear impacts on department finances, and lack of education and research mission integration into service lines. Establishing a satisfactory decision-making structure in a matrixed arrangement and ensuring that funds flow allocations acknowledged neurology's "upstream" contributions were also challenges.

服务线、神经病学和学术医学:部门观点、实施策略和成功关键。
服务项目在组织多学科病人护理方面越来越常见。在几次全国神经内科系主任峰会上,人们对神经科学服务项目的影响表示担忧,这促使美国神经病学会召集了一个服务项目工作组。我们采访了全国范围内已建立或考虑建立神经科学服务项目的机构的神经内科负责人,以了解他们的经验和教训。发现的潜在益处来自于服务线结构带来的额外资源(患者导航员、质量改进人员、技术人员)以及跨部门合作的加强。潜在的缺陷包括:关于建立服务项目的自上而下的机构决策、缺乏明确的目标、神经内科参与较晚、领导层中神经内科代表的不平衡、对科室财务的影响不明确以及服务项目中缺乏教育和研究任务的整合。在矩阵式安排中建立令人满意的决策结构,以及确保资金流分配承认神经内科的 "上游 "贡献,也是面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信