Oropharyngeal dysphagia impact of pneumonia risk in neurological patients receiving enteral tube feeding: Insights from a gastroenterologist.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14946
Tai-Han Lin, Jiunn-Tay Lee, Chih-Wei Yang, Wei-Kuo Chang
{"title":"Oropharyngeal dysphagia impact of pneumonia risk in neurological patients receiving enteral tube feeding: Insights from a gastroenterologist.","authors":"Tai-Han Lin, Jiunn-Tay Lee, Chih-Wei Yang, Wei-Kuo Chang","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent among neurological patients, often necessitating enteral tube feeding with a nasogastric tube (NGT) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). These patients are at significant risk of developing aspiration pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on pneumonia risk requiring hospitalization in neurological patients on long-term enteral tube feeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study was conducted between 2015 and 2022. It included neurological patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy combined with a Modified Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (mFEES) for suspect dysphagia, characterized by difficulty or discomfort in swallowing. Participants were either orally fed or had been on long-term enteral tube feeding via NGT or PEG. A 2-year follow-up was conducted to monitor pneumonia cases requiring hospitalization. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for pneumonia requiring hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 226 orally fed and 152 enteral tube-fed patients were enrolled. Multivariate analyses showed a significantly increased risk of pneumonia in patients with a history of pneumonia and those receiving enteral tube feeding. Subgroup analysis indicated a significantly lower risk of pneumonia among enteral tube-fed patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who PEG-fed patients compared to NGT-fed patients (adjusted HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of pneumonia requiring hospitalization was significantly lower in the PEG group than in the NGT group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mFEES could be a screening tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia. PEG is preferred over NGT for long-term enteral feeding, as it significantly reduces the risk of pneumonia requiring hospitalization, especially in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent among neurological patients, often necessitating enteral tube feeding with a nasogastric tube (NGT) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). These patients are at significant risk of developing aspiration pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on pneumonia risk requiring hospitalization in neurological patients on long-term enteral tube feeding.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted between 2015 and 2022. It included neurological patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy combined with a Modified Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (mFEES) for suspect dysphagia, characterized by difficulty or discomfort in swallowing. Participants were either orally fed or had been on long-term enteral tube feeding via NGT or PEG. A 2-year follow-up was conducted to monitor pneumonia cases requiring hospitalization. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for pneumonia requiring hospitalization.

Key results: A total of 226 orally fed and 152 enteral tube-fed patients were enrolled. Multivariate analyses showed a significantly increased risk of pneumonia in patients with a history of pneumonia and those receiving enteral tube feeding. Subgroup analysis indicated a significantly lower risk of pneumonia among enteral tube-fed patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia who PEG-fed patients compared to NGT-fed patients (adjusted HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of pneumonia requiring hospitalization was significantly lower in the PEG group than in the NGT group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: mFEES could be a screening tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia. PEG is preferred over NGT for long-term enteral feeding, as it significantly reduces the risk of pneumonia requiring hospitalization, especially in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

口咽吞咽困难对接受肠管喂养的神经系统患者肺炎风险的影响:一位胃肠病学家的见解。
背景:口咽吞咽困难在神经系统患者中非常普遍,通常需要使用鼻胃管 (NGT) 或经皮内镜胃造瘘术 (PEG) 进行肠管喂养。这些患者罹患吸入性肺炎的风险很大。本研究旨在评估口咽吞咽困难对长期使用肠管喂养的神经科患者需要住院治疗的肺炎风险的影响:这项回顾性观察研究在 2015 年至 2022 年间进行。研究对象包括因吞咽困难或不适而接受上消化道内镜检查和改良柔性内镜吞咽评估(mFEES)的神经系统患者。参与者要么是口服喂养,要么是通过 NGT 或 PEG 长期使用肠管喂养。对需要住院治疗的肺炎病例进行了为期两年的随访监测。研究人员进行了多变量分析,以确定需要住院治疗的肺炎的风险因素:共纳入 226 名口服喂养和 152 名肠管喂养患者。多变量分析显示,有肺炎病史和接受肠管喂养的患者患肺炎的风险明显增加。亚组分析显示,与 NGT 喂养患者相比,PEG 喂养的口咽吞咽困难肠管喂养患者的肺炎风险明显降低(调整 HR:0.21,95% CI:0.10-0.44,p 结论:mFEES 可作为口咽吞咽困难的筛查工具。在长期肠内喂养中,PEG 比 NGT 更受青睐,因为它能显著降低需要住院治疗的肺炎风险,尤其是在口咽吞咽困难患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信