Julius Wiegert, Dimitri Höhler, Julia Haag, Alexandros Stamatakis
{"title":"Predicting Phylogenetic Bootstrap Values via Machine Learning.","authors":"Julius Wiegert, Dimitri Höhler, Julia Haag, Alexandros Stamatakis","doi":"10.1093/molbev/msae215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating the statistical robustness of the inferred tree(s) constitutes an integral part of most phylogenetic analyses. Commonly, one computes and assigns a branch support value to each inner branch of the inferred phylogeny. The still most widely used method for calculating branch support on trees inferred under maximum likelihood (ML) is the Standard, nonparametric Felsenstein bootstrap support (SBS). Due to the high computational cost of the SBS, a plethora of methods has been developed to approximate it, for instance, via the rapid bootstrap (RB) algorithm. There have also been attempts to devise faster, alternative support measures, such as the SH-aLRT (Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test) or the UltraFast bootstrap 2 (UFBoot2) method. Those faster alternatives exhibit some limitations, such as the need to assess model violations (UFBoot2) or unstable behavior in the low support interval range (SH-aLRT). Here, we present the educated bootstrap guesser (EBG), a machine learning-based tool that predicts SBS branch support values for a given input phylogeny. EBG is on average 9.4 (σ=5.5) times faster than UFBoot2. EBG-based SBS estimates exhibit a median absolute error of 5 when predicting SBS values between 0 and 100. Furthermore, EBG also provides uncertainty measures for all per-branch SBS predictions and thereby allows for a more rigorous and careful interpretation. EBG can, for instance, predict SBS support values on a phylogeny comprising 1,654 SARS-CoV2 genome sequences within 3 h on a mid-class laptop. EBG is available under GNU GPL3.</p>","PeriodicalId":18730,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae215","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Estimating the statistical robustness of the inferred tree(s) constitutes an integral part of most phylogenetic analyses. Commonly, one computes and assigns a branch support value to each inner branch of the inferred phylogeny. The still most widely used method for calculating branch support on trees inferred under maximum likelihood (ML) is the Standard, nonparametric Felsenstein bootstrap support (SBS). Due to the high computational cost of the SBS, a plethora of methods has been developed to approximate it, for instance, via the rapid bootstrap (RB) algorithm. There have also been attempts to devise faster, alternative support measures, such as the SH-aLRT (Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test) or the UltraFast bootstrap 2 (UFBoot2) method. Those faster alternatives exhibit some limitations, such as the need to assess model violations (UFBoot2) or unstable behavior in the low support interval range (SH-aLRT). Here, we present the educated bootstrap guesser (EBG), a machine learning-based tool that predicts SBS branch support values for a given input phylogeny. EBG is on average 9.4 (σ=5.5) times faster than UFBoot2. EBG-based SBS estimates exhibit a median absolute error of 5 when predicting SBS values between 0 and 100. Furthermore, EBG also provides uncertainty measures for all per-branch SBS predictions and thereby allows for a more rigorous and careful interpretation. EBG can, for instance, predict SBS support values on a phylogeny comprising 1,654 SARS-CoV2 genome sequences within 3 h on a mid-class laptop. EBG is available under GNU GPL3.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Journal Overview:
Publishes research at the interface of molecular (including genomics) and evolutionary biology
Considers manuscripts containing patterns, processes, and predictions at all levels of organization: population, taxonomic, functional, and phenotypic
Interested in fundamental discoveries, new and improved methods, resources, technologies, and theories advancing evolutionary research
Publishes balanced reviews of recent developments in genome evolution and forward-looking perspectives suggesting future directions in molecular evolution applications.