Efficacy of Alogliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets and Vildagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets on Glycemic Control in Real-World Clinical Practice for the Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group, Comparative Trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1089/met.2024.0127
Tomoe Abe, Yasutaka Takeda, Ichiro Sakuma, Mizuho Okada, Ayaka Kurigaki, Ryoichi Bessho, Mao Sato, Hiroya Kitsunai, Yumi Takiyama, Masaru Sakurai
{"title":"Efficacy of Alogliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets and Vildagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets on Glycemic Control in Real-World Clinical Practice for the Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group, Comparative Trial.","authors":"Tomoe Abe, Yasutaka Takeda, Ichiro Sakuma, Mizuho Okada, Ayaka Kurigaki, Ryoichi Bessho, Mao Sato, Hiroya Kitsunai, Yumi Takiyama, Masaru Sakurai","doi":"10.1089/met.2024.0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of two combination tablets of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and metformin with different dosages, alogliptin/metformin (AM) and vildagliptin/metformin (VM), on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group, comparative trial. After a run-in period of treatment with metformin alone, a total of 59 Japanese outpatients with T2D, aged 20-79 years with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 6.5%-10% were randomly assigned to 12-week AM treatment, alogliptin 25 mg/metformin 500 mg combination tablet orally once a day, or VM treatment, vildagliptin 50 mg/metformin 250 mg combination tablet orally twice a day. The primary endpoints were the changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels from baseline to week 12 between the two groups. Blinded intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) was performed between weeks 10 and 12. The incidence of adverse events during the study was also evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In all, 52 participants were analyzed. Significant decreases in HbA1c and FPG levels from baseline to week 12 were observed in both treatment groups. However, there were no significant differences between the AM and VM groups in the change in HbA1c level (-0.3% and -0.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.309) or the FPG level (-9.0 and -15.0 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.789). The isCGM revealed that both treatments achieved the recommended glycemic target range. No adverse events, such as severe hypoglycemia, were observed in either group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We concluded that there were no significant differences in the efficacy of two combination tablets of DPP-4 inhibitors and metformin with different dosages on glycemic control in patients with T2D.</p>","PeriodicalId":18405,"journal":{"name":"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2024.0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of two combination tablets of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and metformin with different dosages, alogliptin/metformin (AM) and vildagliptin/metformin (VM), on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group, comparative trial. After a run-in period of treatment with metformin alone, a total of 59 Japanese outpatients with T2D, aged 20-79 years with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 6.5%-10% were randomly assigned to 12-week AM treatment, alogliptin 25 mg/metformin 500 mg combination tablet orally once a day, or VM treatment, vildagliptin 50 mg/metformin 250 mg combination tablet orally twice a day. The primary endpoints were the changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels from baseline to week 12 between the two groups. Blinded intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) was performed between weeks 10 and 12. The incidence of adverse events during the study was also evaluated. Results: In all, 52 participants were analyzed. Significant decreases in HbA1c and FPG levels from baseline to week 12 were observed in both treatment groups. However, there were no significant differences between the AM and VM groups in the change in HbA1c level (-0.3% and -0.4%, P = 0.309) or the FPG level (-9.0 and -15.0 mg/dL, P = 0.789). The isCGM revealed that both treatments achieved the recommended glycemic target range. No adverse events, such as severe hypoglycemia, were observed in either group. Conclusions: We concluded that there were no significant differences in the efficacy of two combination tablets of DPP-4 inhibitors and metformin with different dosages on glycemic control in patients with T2D.

阿格列汀/二甲双胍固定剂量复方片和维达列汀/二甲双胍固定剂量复方片在实际临床实践中对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的疗效:一项多中心、开放标签、随机、平行组比较试验。
研究背景本研究旨在比较阿格列汀/二甲双胍(AM)和维达列汀/二甲双胍(VM)这两种不同剂量的二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂和二甲双胍复方片剂对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者血糖控制的疗效。研究方法这是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机、平行分组的比较试验。在单用二甲双胍治疗的磨合期后,59 名年龄在 20-79 岁之间、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平在 6.5%-10% 之间的日本门诊 2 型糖尿病患者被随机分配到为期 12 周的 AM 治疗(阿格列汀 25 毫克/二甲双胍 500 毫克复方片剂,口服,每天一次)或 VM 治疗(维达列汀 50 毫克/二甲双胍 250 毫克复方片剂,口服,每天两次)。主要终点是两组患者的 HbA1c 和空腹血浆葡萄糖 (FPG) 水平从基线到第 12 周的变化。在第 10 周和第 12 周之间进行盲法间歇扫描连续血糖监测 (isCGM)。此外,还评估了研究期间不良事件的发生率。结果共对 52 名参与者进行了分析。从基线到第 12 周,两个治疗组的 HbA1c 和 FPG 水平都有显著下降。然而,AM 组和 VM 组在 HbA1c 水平变化(-0.3% 和 -0.4%,P = 0.309)或 FPG 水平变化(-9.0 和 -15.0 mg/dL,P = 0.789)方面没有明显差异。isCGM显示,两种疗法都达到了推荐的血糖目标范围。两组患者均未出现严重低血糖等不良反应。结论我们得出结论:两种不同剂量的 DPP-4 抑制剂和二甲双胍联合片剂对 T2D 患者血糖控制的疗效没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing solely on the pathophysiology, recognition, and treatment of this major health condition. The Journal meets the imperative for comprehensive research, data, and commentary on metabolic disorder as a suspected precursor to a wide range of diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, polycystic ovary syndrome, gout, and asthma. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders coverage includes: -Insulin resistance- Central obesity- Glucose intolerance- Dyslipidemia with elevated triglycerides- Low HDL-cholesterol- Microalbuminuria- Predominance of small dense LDL-cholesterol particles- Hypertension- Endothelial dysfunction- Oxidative stress- Inflammation- Related disorders of polycystic ovarian syndrome, fatty liver disease (NASH), and gout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信