Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy among Iranians Participated in the National COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Survey: A Qualitative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.50
Hajar Nazari Kangavari, Ahmad Hajebi, Hamid Peyrovi, Masoud Salehi, Mohammad Hossein Taghdisi, Abbas Motevalian
{"title":"Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy among Iranians Participated in the National COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Survey: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Hajar Nazari Kangavari, Ahmad Hajebi, Hamid Peyrovi, Masoud Salehi, Mohammad Hossein Taghdisi, Abbas Motevalian","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Success in COVID-19 vaccination depends on understanding why people refuse or hesitate to take the vaccine. This study aims to explore vaccine refusal and hesitancy among Iranians who participated in the national COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative content analysis approach was used. Twenty-six participants were selected by purposive sampling. In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted during the year 2022. A directed content analysis approach was used for analyzing the data by extracting the codes, subcategories, and categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major categories and their respective subcategories related to refusal and/ or hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccination emerged: \"lack of confidence\" (distrust in policymakers and pharmaceutical companies, distrust in national media, belief in conspiracy theory, and lack of confidence in the vaccine's safety and effectiveness), \"complacency\" (Fatalism and philosophical beliefs, low perceived risk, and belief in the adequacy of the precautionary principles), \"constrains\" (personal and psychological barriers), and \"coercion\" (coercion by relatives and unsteady imposed mandatory vaccination by the government).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distrust, fatalism, low perceived risk, and overconfidence in traditional Persian medicine were important barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability needing a variety of measures for improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake, including enhancing public trust in government and policymakers, clarifying vaccine safety and effectiveness, dealing with religious fatalism, and regulating anti-science messages on social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Success in COVID-19 vaccination depends on understanding why people refuse or hesitate to take the vaccine. This study aims to explore vaccine refusal and hesitancy among Iranians who participated in the national COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy survey.

Methods: A qualitative content analysis approach was used. Twenty-six participants were selected by purposive sampling. In-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted during the year 2022. A directed content analysis approach was used for analyzing the data by extracting the codes, subcategories, and categories.

Results: Four major categories and their respective subcategories related to refusal and/ or hesitancy against COVID-19 vaccination emerged: "lack of confidence" (distrust in policymakers and pharmaceutical companies, distrust in national media, belief in conspiracy theory, and lack of confidence in the vaccine's safety and effectiveness), "complacency" (Fatalism and philosophical beliefs, low perceived risk, and belief in the adequacy of the precautionary principles), "constrains" (personal and psychological barriers), and "coercion" (coercion by relatives and unsteady imposed mandatory vaccination by the government).

Conclusion: Distrust, fatalism, low perceived risk, and overconfidence in traditional Persian medicine were important barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptability needing a variety of measures for improving COVID-19 vaccine uptake, including enhancing public trust in government and policymakers, clarifying vaccine safety and effectiveness, dealing with religious fatalism, and regulating anti-science messages on social media.

参加 COVID-19 全国疫苗接种意愿调查的伊朗人拒绝接种和犹豫接种疫苗的情况:定性研究。
背景:COVID-19 疫苗接种的成功与否取决于了解人们拒绝或犹豫接种疫苗的原因。本研究旨在探讨参与全国 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫调查的伊朗人拒绝接种和犹豫接种的原因:方法:采用定性内容分析法。通过目的性抽样选取了 26 名参与者。在 2022 年期间进行了深入的半结构化电话访谈。通过提取代码、子类别和类别,采用定向内容分析法对数据进行分析:结果:与拒绝接受和/或犹豫接种 COVID-19 疫苗有关的四个主要类别及其各自的子类别出现了:"缺乏信心"(不信任政策制定者和制药公司、不信任国家媒体、相信阴谋论、对疫苗的安全性和有效性缺乏信心)、"自满"(宿命论和哲学信仰、低风险感知、相信预防原则的充分性)、"制约因素"(个人和心理障碍)、"胁迫"(亲属胁迫和政府强制接种的不稳定性):不信任、宿命论、低风险感知以及对波斯传统医学的过度自信是影响 COVID-19 疫苗可接受性的重要障碍,需要采取各种措施来提高 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率,包括提高公众对政府和决策者的信任、澄清疫苗的安全性和有效性、应对宗教宿命论以及规范社交媒体上的反科学信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信