Physicians' Knowledge and Attitude about Generic Drugs in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.65
Zandulla Nakipov, Dinara Kaliyeva, Assiya Turgambayeva, Zakira Kerimbayeva, Zhalgaskali Arystanov, Tanagul Arystanova, Nellya Ivanchenko, Nabil Joseph Awadalla
{"title":"Physicians' Knowledge and Attitude about Generic Drugs in the Republic of Kazakhstan.","authors":"Zandulla Nakipov, Dinara Kaliyeva, Assiya Turgambayeva, Zakira Kerimbayeva, Zhalgaskali Arystanov, Tanagul Arystanova, Nellya Ivanchenko, Nabil Joseph Awadalla","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most effective measures to reduce the cost of medicines for both the healthcare system and patients is the use of generic drugs (GDs). The objective of this study was to identify the physicians' level of knowledge and attitude toward GDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted based on a specially designed validated questionnaire of 19 items. The survey was attended by doctors of various specialties working in polyclinics in six regions in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Construct validity was assessed through principal component factor analysis, whereas reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests when comparing two and more than two groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 450 physicians. Only 260 (57.8%) believed that GDs are bioequivalent to the brand name drug (strongly agree and agree). About 202 (45%) of respondents doubt the effectiveness of GDs, and 144 (32%) assumed that they cause more side effects compared to similar branded drugs. Also, the majority of the respondents 320 (71.2%) felt that branded drugs should be held to higher safety standards than GDs. Approximately 338 (75%) of the physicians positively expressed that both physicians and pharmacists need standardized guidelines for the brand name substitution process. Further, 372 (82.7%) proposed that more information about the safety and efficacy of GD is needed. Also, 326 (72.4%), 314 (88.2%), and 85 (18.9%) of the respondents assumed that patients' socio-economic factors, trust in manufacturers/suppliers, and bonuses on products respectively influence the prescribing of medicines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the study indicated that physicians in the Republic of Kazakhstan are acknowledging the use of GDs, concerns about the effectiveness and safety of GDs remain high. To enhance the use of GDs, physicians' targeted educational programs on GDs' bioequivalence, safety, and efficacy should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most effective measures to reduce the cost of medicines for both the healthcare system and patients is the use of generic drugs (GDs). The objective of this study was to identify the physicians' level of knowledge and attitude toward GDs.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted based on a specially designed validated questionnaire of 19 items. The survey was attended by doctors of various specialties working in polyclinics in six regions in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Construct validity was assessed through principal component factor analysis, whereas reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests when comparing two and more than two groups, respectively.

Results: The study involved 450 physicians. Only 260 (57.8%) believed that GDs are bioequivalent to the brand name drug (strongly agree and agree). About 202 (45%) of respondents doubt the effectiveness of GDs, and 144 (32%) assumed that they cause more side effects compared to similar branded drugs. Also, the majority of the respondents 320 (71.2%) felt that branded drugs should be held to higher safety standards than GDs. Approximately 338 (75%) of the physicians positively expressed that both physicians and pharmacists need standardized guidelines for the brand name substitution process. Further, 372 (82.7%) proposed that more information about the safety and efficacy of GD is needed. Also, 326 (72.4%), 314 (88.2%), and 85 (18.9%) of the respondents assumed that patients' socio-economic factors, trust in manufacturers/suppliers, and bonuses on products respectively influence the prescribing of medicines.

Conclusion: Although the study indicated that physicians in the Republic of Kazakhstan are acknowledging the use of GDs, concerns about the effectiveness and safety of GDs remain high. To enhance the use of GDs, physicians' targeted educational programs on GDs' bioequivalence, safety, and efficacy should be implemented.

哈萨克斯坦共和国医生对非专利药品的认识和态度。
背景:对医疗系统和患者而言,降低药品成本的最有效措施之一是使用非专利药品(GDs)。本研究旨在了解医生对普通药品的认识水平和态度:方法:根据专门设计的经过验证的 19 个项目的调查问卷进行了横向调查。调查对象为哈萨克斯坦共和国六个地区综合医院的各科医生。结构效度通过主成分因子分析进行评估,信度通过克朗巴赫α系数进行评估。在比较两个组和两个以上组时,分别使用 Mann-Whitney 和 Kruskal-Wallis 非参数检验来评估组间差异:研究涉及 450 名医生。只有 260 人(57.8%)认为广东药与品牌药具有生物等效性(非常同意和同意)。约 202 名受访者(45%)怀疑普通药物的疗效,144 名受访者(32%)认为与同类品牌药物相比,普通药物会产生更多副作用。此外,大多数受访者(320 人,占 71.2%)认为品牌药的安全标准应高于普通药物。约有 338 名(75%)医生积极地表示,医生和药剂师在品牌药替代过程中都需要标准化的指导原则。此外,372 位(82.7%)医生提出需要更多有关普通药品安全性和有效性的信息。此外,326 位受访者(72.4%)、314 位受访者(88.2%)和 85 位受访者(18.9%)分别认为,患者的社会经济因素、对生产商/供应商的信任度和产品奖金会影响处方药的开具:尽管研究表明哈萨克斯坦共和国的医生承认使用普通处方药,但对普通处方药的有效性和安全性的担忧仍然很高。为了提高普通药物的使用率,医生们应该就普通药物的生物等效性、安全性和有效性实施有针对性的教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信