Expert Consensus on Clinical Recommendations for Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser, in Facial Skin Rejuvenation Treatment.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Tal Levy, Ilana Lerman, Jill Waibel, Gerd G Gauglitz, Matteo T Clementoni, Daniel P Friedmann, Kevin Duplechain, Peter Peng, Davin Lim, Firas Al-Niaimi, Shangli Lin, Gilly Munavalli, Brian S Biesman, Greg J Goodman, Alina Fratila, Thomas M Beachkofsky, E Victor Ross, Asif Hussein, Arielle Kauvar, Suzanne L Kilmer, Robert Langdon, Ronald L Moy, Ofir Artzi
{"title":"Expert Consensus on Clinical Recommendations for Fractional Ablative CO<sub>2</sub> Laser, in Facial Skin Rejuvenation Treatment.","authors":"Tal Levy, Ilana Lerman, Jill Waibel, Gerd G Gauglitz, Matteo T Clementoni, Daniel P Friedmann, Kevin Duplechain, Peter Peng, Davin Lim, Firas Al-Niaimi, Shangli Lin, Gilly Munavalli, Brian S Biesman, Greg J Goodman, Alina Fratila, Thomas M Beachkofsky, E Victor Ross, Asif Hussein, Arielle Kauvar, Suzanne L Kilmer, Robert Langdon, Ronald L Moy, Ofir Artzi","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For three decades, fractional ablative CO<sub>2</sub> lasers have been used for skin rejuvenation. With breakthroughs in laser technology and expanding popularity, new recommendations and suggestions arise on a regular basis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop up-to-date clinical recommendations on safety measures, therapeutic framework, and techniques to improve treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Google Forms, a questionnaire with 188 questions was given to a varied sample of 21 dermatologists and plastic surgeons from various countries and practice contexts. A second questionnaire with 11 items was created to resolve any gaps or discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Active face infections are considered a treatment contraindication by 95% of panelists. Burns, recent sun exposure, and pregnancy or breastfeeding were also considered contraindications (according to 67% of panelists). Over 90% employ bacterial and viral prophylaxis, however the majority (67%) do not prescribe antifungal prophylaxis. The most often stated anesthetic treatments by panelists are topical anesthetic cream, nerve blocks, and oral analgesics (according to 95%, 81%, and 62% of panelists respectively). Over 90% of panel members suggested treatment setting alterations for individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV. Following reepithelization, which happens between 8 and 42 days after the treatment, the majority (76%) of panelists advocate continuing standard skin care routines including active ingredients. Eighty-one percent of panelists recommend using supplementary treatment to maximize results. Supplementary treatment recommendations included use of neuromodulators (76% of panelists), Intense Pulsed Light Therapy treatments pre and postprocedure (61% of panelists), and injection-based therapies such as (Hyaluronic Acid fillers, and biostimulatory fillers) (recommended by 48% of panelists). 60% of panelists perform FACL to improve skin laxity treatment in nonfacial areas and adjust their settings accordingly.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our results reflect only a modest panel size; with a focus on a specific device. Although experienced, the small number of panelists, recommendations, and personal adverse reactions encounters for resurfacing indication, might be biased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser is a popular and effective skin rejuvenation treatment with minimal downtime and side effects. This study presents new therapy recommendations to resolve treatment uncertainty and provide complete care suggestions for best results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For three decades, fractional ablative CO2 lasers have been used for skin rejuvenation. With breakthroughs in laser technology and expanding popularity, new recommendations and suggestions arise on a regular basis.

Objective: To develop up-to-date clinical recommendations on safety measures, therapeutic framework, and techniques to improve treatment outcomes.

Methods: Using Google Forms, a questionnaire with 188 questions was given to a varied sample of 21 dermatologists and plastic surgeons from various countries and practice contexts. A second questionnaire with 11 items was created to resolve any gaps or discrepancies.

Results: Active face infections are considered a treatment contraindication by 95% of panelists. Burns, recent sun exposure, and pregnancy or breastfeeding were also considered contraindications (according to 67% of panelists). Over 90% employ bacterial and viral prophylaxis, however the majority (67%) do not prescribe antifungal prophylaxis. The most often stated anesthetic treatments by panelists are topical anesthetic cream, nerve blocks, and oral analgesics (according to 95%, 81%, and 62% of panelists respectively). Over 90% of panel members suggested treatment setting alterations for individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV. Following reepithelization, which happens between 8 and 42 days after the treatment, the majority (76%) of panelists advocate continuing standard skin care routines including active ingredients. Eighty-one percent of panelists recommend using supplementary treatment to maximize results. Supplementary treatment recommendations included use of neuromodulators (76% of panelists), Intense Pulsed Light Therapy treatments pre and postprocedure (61% of panelists), and injection-based therapies such as (Hyaluronic Acid fillers, and biostimulatory fillers) (recommended by 48% of panelists). 60% of panelists perform FACL to improve skin laxity treatment in nonfacial areas and adjust their settings accordingly.

Limitations: Our results reflect only a modest panel size; with a focus on a specific device. Although experienced, the small number of panelists, recommendations, and personal adverse reactions encounters for resurfacing indication, might be biased.

Conclusion: Fractional CO2 laser is a popular and effective skin rejuvenation treatment with minimal downtime and side effects. This study presents new therapy recommendations to resolve treatment uncertainty and provide complete care suggestions for best results.

关于在面部皮肤年轻化治疗中使用二氧化碳点阵消融激光的临床建议的专家共识。
背景:三十年来,点阵烧蚀二氧化碳激光一直被用于嫩肤。随着激光技术的突破和普及,新的建议和意见也不断涌现:制定有关安全措施、治疗框架和技术的最新临床建议,以提高治疗效果:方法:使用谷歌表格,向来自不同国家和执业环境的 21 位皮肤科医生和整形外科医生发放了一份包含 188 个问题的调查问卷。为了解决问卷中存在的不足或差异,我们又制作了一份包含 11 个问题的调查问卷:结果:95%的专家组成员认为面部感染是治疗禁忌症。烧伤、近期暴晒、怀孕或哺乳也被视为禁忌症(67%的专家组成员认为)。超过 90% 的专家采用细菌和病毒预防措施,但大多数专家(67%)不采用抗真菌预防措施。专家组成员最常使用的麻醉治疗方法是局部麻醉膏、神经阻滞和口服镇痛药(分别占专家组成员的 95%、81% 和 62%)。超过 90% 的专家组成员建议改变菲茨帕特里克 III-IV 型皮肤患者的治疗环境。在治疗后 8 到 42 天内重新上皮后,大多数专家组成员(76%)主张继续使用包括活性成分在内的标准皮肤护理程序。81%的专家组成员建议使用辅助治疗,以达到最佳效果。辅助治疗建议包括使用神经调节剂(76% 的专家组成员)、治疗前后的强脉冲光疗法(61% 的专家组成员)以及注射疗法,如透明质酸填充剂和生物刺激填充剂(48% 的专家组成员推荐)。60%的专家组成员采用 FACL 来改善非面部区域的皮肤松弛治疗,并相应调整其设置:局限性:我们的结果仅反映了一个规模不大的专家小组;重点关注特定设备。尽管经验丰富,但由于小组成员人数较少、建议和个人在换肤适应症方面遇到的不良反应,可能会产生偏差:点阵 CO2 激光是一种流行且有效的嫩肤治疗方法,其停工期和副作用极小。本研究提出了新的治疗建议,以解决治疗的不确定性,并提供完整的护理建议,以获得最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信