Potential Risk Factors for Developing Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in Women With a History of Cesarean Section.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Shurong Liu, Xiaqin Liu, Qi Chen, Min Zhao, Yunhui Tang
{"title":"Potential Risk Factors for Developing Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in Women With a History of Cesarean Section.","authors":"Shurong Liu, Xiaqin Liu, Qi Chen, Min Zhao, Yunhui Tang","doi":"10.1002/jum.16599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) occurs in 0.2%-0.5% of women with a previous cesarean section globally. Multiple factors influence the development of CSP; however, to date, the critical factors contributing to the development of CSP have not been fully explored due to its relatively low incidence. Moreover, CSP can be clinically categorized into type 1 and type 2 CSP. In this retrospective study with a large sample size, we investigated potential risk factors that could contribute to CSP development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred-one women diagnosed with CSP, either type 1 or type 2 CSP, and 1700 pregnant women with a history of cesarean section but without CSP diagnosis in subsequent pregnancy were included. Gravidity, previous live birth(s), consecutive cesarean section(s), surgical abortion(s), the interval between the pregnancies, and maternal age were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gravidity, the number of previous live births, the number of previous consecutive cesarean sections, and the number of surgical abortions were significantly associated with CSP development in women with a past cesarean section. This association was regardless of the subtypes of CSP. Notably, the interval between 2 pregnancies was also significantly associated with CSP development, but this association was only seen in type 2 CSP. However, maternal age was not an independent risk factor for CSP development. Additionally, a higher incidence of CSP was observed in China compared to that reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to a previous cesarean section, our study highlights at the number of surgical abortions also contributes to the development of CSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) occurs in 0.2%-0.5% of women with a previous cesarean section globally. Multiple factors influence the development of CSP; however, to date, the critical factors contributing to the development of CSP have not been fully explored due to its relatively low incidence. Moreover, CSP can be clinically categorized into type 1 and type 2 CSP. In this retrospective study with a large sample size, we investigated potential risk factors that could contribute to CSP development.

Methods: Two hundred-one women diagnosed with CSP, either type 1 or type 2 CSP, and 1700 pregnant women with a history of cesarean section but without CSP diagnosis in subsequent pregnancy were included. Gravidity, previous live birth(s), consecutive cesarean section(s), surgical abortion(s), the interval between the pregnancies, and maternal age were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Gravidity, the number of previous live births, the number of previous consecutive cesarean sections, and the number of surgical abortions were significantly associated with CSP development in women with a past cesarean section. This association was regardless of the subtypes of CSP. Notably, the interval between 2 pregnancies was also significantly associated with CSP development, but this association was only seen in type 2 CSP. However, maternal age was not an independent risk factor for CSP development. Additionally, a higher incidence of CSP was observed in China compared to that reported in the literature.

Conclusion: In addition to a previous cesarean section, our study highlights at the number of surgical abortions also contributes to the development of CSP.

有剖腹产史的妇女罹患剖腹产瘢痕妊娠的潜在风险因素。
目的:在全球范围内,剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)发生率为 0.2%-0.5%。影响 CSP 发生的因素有很多,但迄今为止,由于 CSP 的发生率相对较低,导致 CSP 发生的关键因素尚未得到充分探究。此外,CSP 在临床上可分为 1 型和 2 型 CSP。在这项样本量较大的回顾性研究中,我们调查了可能导致 CSP 发展的潜在风险因素:方法:纳入了 211 名确诊为 CSP(1 型或 2 型 CSP)的孕妇,以及 1700 名有剖宫产史但在随后的妊娠中未确诊为 CSP 的孕妇。对两组孕妇的妊娠率、既往活产次数、连续剖宫产次数、手术流产次数、妊娠间隔时间和孕妇年龄进行了比较:结果:孕激素、既往活产次数、既往连续剖宫产次数和手术流产次数与既往剖宫产妇女的 CSP 发病有显著相关性。这种关联与 CSP 的亚型无关。值得注意的是,两次妊娠的间隔时间也与 CSP 的发展有显著相关性,但这种相关性只出现在 2 型 CSP 中。然而,孕产妇年龄并不是CSP发生的独立风险因素。此外,与文献报道相比,中国的 CSP 发生率更高:结论:除了剖宫产外,我们的研究还强调了手术流产的次数也是导致 CSP 的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信