Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Detection of Epiphyseal Ossification Centers of the Knee in Infants With Permanent Congenital Hypothyroidism.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Charlotte Chiri, Daniela Rapilat, Freddy Avni, Christine Lefèvre, Julien Labreuche, Héloïse Lerisson, Céline Tillaux, Mohamed El Fayoumi, Nathalie Boutry
{"title":"Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Radiography in the Detection of Epiphyseal Ossification Centers of the Knee in Infants With Permanent Congenital Hypothyroidism.","authors":"Charlotte Chiri, Daniela Rapilat, Freddy Avni, Christine Lefèvre, Julien Labreuche, Héloïse Lerisson, Céline Tillaux, Mohamed El Fayoumi, Nathalie Boutry","doi":"10.1002/jum.16603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the usefulness of ultrasonography in detecting knee ossification centers in infants with permanent congenital hypothyroidism (PCH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2011 to 2021, all infants with PCH referred for thyroid ultrasound also underwent left knee ultrasound and radiography on the same day. Knee radiographs were compared with knee sonograms. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed the consensus knee radiographs and sonograms to identify femoral and tibial epiphyseal ossification centers (presence/absence). The concordance between ultrasonography and radiography was assessed. Another radiologist conducted a second late review to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 125 patients (65 girls, 60 boys) with a mean age of 24 days (5 days-5 months). On scintigraphy, the thyroid was in place in 66.4%, ectopic in 24%, and absent in 9.6% of patients. The femoral center was observed in 108 patients (86.4%) via sonography and 106 patients (84.8%) via radiography. The tibial center was observed in 84 patients (67.2%) via sonography and radiography. Both femoral and tibial centers were present on sonography and radiography in 84 patients (67.2%). A single nucleus was present in 24 patients (19.2%) on sonography and 22 patients (17.6%) on radiography; it corresponded to the femoral center in all patients. The concordance between ultrasonography and radiography was 99% and 100%, respectively, for the detection of the femoral and tibial centers. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both ultrasonography and radiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasonography is as effective as radiography in detecting knee ossification centers in PCH. It can be performed at the same time as thyroid examination, in place of radiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the usefulness of ultrasonography in detecting knee ossification centers in infants with permanent congenital hypothyroidism (PCH).

Methods: From 2011 to 2021, all infants with PCH referred for thyroid ultrasound also underwent left knee ultrasound and radiography on the same day. Knee radiographs were compared with knee sonograms. Two pediatric radiologists reviewed the consensus knee radiographs and sonograms to identify femoral and tibial epiphyseal ossification centers (presence/absence). The concordance between ultrasonography and radiography was assessed. Another radiologist conducted a second late review to evaluate interobserver agreement.

Results: We identified 125 patients (65 girls, 60 boys) with a mean age of 24 days (5 days-5 months). On scintigraphy, the thyroid was in place in 66.4%, ectopic in 24%, and absent in 9.6% of patients. The femoral center was observed in 108 patients (86.4%) via sonography and 106 patients (84.8%) via radiography. The tibial center was observed in 84 patients (67.2%) via sonography and radiography. Both femoral and tibial centers were present on sonography and radiography in 84 patients (67.2%). A single nucleus was present in 24 patients (19.2%) on sonography and 22 patients (17.6%) on radiography; it corresponded to the femoral center in all patients. The concordance between ultrasonography and radiography was 99% and 100%, respectively, for the detection of the femoral and tibial centers. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both ultrasonography and radiography.

Conclusion: Ultrasonography is as effective as radiography in detecting knee ossification centers in PCH. It can be performed at the same time as thyroid examination, in place of radiography.

在检测先天性永久性甲状腺功能减退症婴儿膝关节骺骨化中心方面,超声波成像与射线成像的比较
目的证明超声波检查在检测永久性先天性甲状腺功能减退症(PCH)婴儿膝关节骨化中心方面的作用:方法:2011 年至 2021 年期间,所有转诊接受甲状腺超声检查的先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿均在同一天接受了左膝超声检查和放射线检查。膝关节X光片与膝关节声像图进行比较。两名儿科放射科专家对一致同意的膝关节X光片和声像图进行审查,以确定股骨和胫骨骺骨化中心(存在/不存在)。评估了超声造影与射线造影之间的一致性。另一名放射科医生进行了第二次后期复查,以评估观察者之间的一致性:我们共发现了 125 名患者(65 名女孩,60 名男孩),平均年龄为 24 天(5 天-5 个月)。在闪烁扫描中,66.4%的患者甲状腺在位,24%异位,9.6%缺失。108名患者(86.4%)通过超声波检查观察到股骨中心,106名患者(84.8%)通过放射线检查观察到股骨中心。84名患者(67.2%)通过超声波检查和放射线检查观察到胫骨中心。有 84 名患者(67.2%)通过声波和射线检查同时发现股骨中心和胫骨中心。有 24 名患者(19.2%)通过超声波检查和 22 名患者(17.6%)通过放射线检查发现了单个髓核;所有患者的髓核都与股骨中心相对应。在股骨中心和胫骨中心的检测中,超声波和X光造影的一致性分别为99%和100%。结论:超声波检查和X光造影检查的观察者之间的一致性非常高,几乎达到完美:结论:在检测 PCH 患者膝关节骨化中心方面,超声造影与放射造影一样有效。结论:在检测 PCH 患者膝关节骨化中心方面,超声造影与射线造影一样有效,可在甲状腺检查时同时进行,以取代射线造影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信