Cardiothoracic Surgery Interviews and Selection in a Pandemic Era – Lessons to Learn

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Naima A. Alver MD , Jay D. Pal MD, PhD , Castigliano M. Bhamidipati DO, PhD, MSc, FACS, FACC
{"title":"Cardiothoracic Surgery Interviews and Selection in a Pandemic Era – Lessons to Learn","authors":"Naima A. Alver MD ,&nbsp;Jay D. Pal MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Castigliano M. Bhamidipati DO, PhD, MSc, FACS, FACC","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Candidate selection for cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) training programs is challenging. The recent pandemic has impacted a program's ability to meet matriculants in-person. We hypothesized that a central venue at the CTS annual meeting could prove as a favorable supplement for programs and applicants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Surveys were sent to adult cardiothoracic and congenital cardiac surgery training program directors (PD) and department chairs or division chiefs. Separately, surveys were sent to applicants from the 2018 through 2023 electronic residency application service match process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 166 individuals (PDs and department chairs or division chiefs) were contacted. This represented 94 unique programs, and 45 programs responded. The majority of these programs (88.9%) felt that social gatherings were valuable in evaluating applicants and 86.7% would be interested in a social event at an Society of Thoracic Surgery annual meeting. 54% of applicants did not get an accurate impression of the programs to inform their rank list through virtual interviews, 70% would not be able to accept the same number of interviews in-person <em>versus</em> virtual, and 94% would be interested in attending an annual conference to meet program faculty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A centralized in-person interview event allows for fiscal and scheduling efficiencies, while creating an opportunity for an equitable exchange between potential candidates and PDs in an efficient manner. Such an event would cost a fraction of what our profession has been incurring, could diversify our workforce, would create early mentoring linkages, and perhaps remodel the way we select trainees.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 454-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424005869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Candidate selection for cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) training programs is challenging. The recent pandemic has impacted a program's ability to meet matriculants in-person. We hypothesized that a central venue at the CTS annual meeting could prove as a favorable supplement for programs and applicants.

Methods

Surveys were sent to adult cardiothoracic and congenital cardiac surgery training program directors (PD) and department chairs or division chiefs. Separately, surveys were sent to applicants from the 2018 through 2023 electronic residency application service match process.

Results

A total of 166 individuals (PDs and department chairs or division chiefs) were contacted. This represented 94 unique programs, and 45 programs responded. The majority of these programs (88.9%) felt that social gatherings were valuable in evaluating applicants and 86.7% would be interested in a social event at an Society of Thoracic Surgery annual meeting. 54% of applicants did not get an accurate impression of the programs to inform their rank list through virtual interviews, 70% would not be able to accept the same number of interviews in-person versus virtual, and 94% would be interested in attending an annual conference to meet program faculty.

Conclusions

A centralized in-person interview event allows for fiscal and scheduling efficiencies, while creating an opportunity for an equitable exchange between potential candidates and PDs in an efficient manner. Such an event would cost a fraction of what our profession has been incurring, could diversify our workforce, would create early mentoring linkages, and perhaps remodel the way we select trainees.
大流行时代的心胸外科面试和选拔--值得借鉴的经验。
导言:心胸外科(CTS)培训项目的候选人遴选工作极具挑战性。最近的大流行影响了培训项目与预科生面对面交流的能力。我们假设,在 CTS 年会上设立一个中心会场可以证明是对项目和申请人的有利补充:我们向成人心胸外科和先天性心脏外科培训项目主任(PD)、系主任或科主任发送了调查问卷。另外,还向2018年至2023年住院医师电子申请服务匹配过程中的申请人发送了调查问卷:共联系了 166 人(项目主任和科主任或科主任)。这代表了 94 个独特的项目,其中 45 个项目做出了回应。其中大多数项目(88.9%)认为社交聚会对评估申请人很有价值,86.7%的项目对胸外科学会年会上的社交活动感兴趣。54%的申请者无法通过虚拟面试获得对项目的准确印象,从而影响他们的排名,70%的申请者无法接受相同数量的现场面试和虚拟面试,94%的申请者有兴趣参加年会与项目教师会面:集中的面对面面试活动可以提高财政和时间安排的效率,同时为潜在候选人和项目主任之间以高效的方式进行公平交流创造机会。这样的活动所花费的成本仅为我们专业所花费成本的一小部分,可以使我们的劳动力多样化,建立早期的指导联系,或许还能重塑我们选择受训者的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信