The impact of cannabidiol placebo on amygdala-based neural responses to an acute stressor.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1177/02698811241287557
Robin N Perry, Mikeala A Ethier-Gagnon, Carl Helmick, Toni C Spinella, Philip G Tibbo, Sherry H Stewart, Sean P Barrett
{"title":"The impact of cannabidiol placebo on amygdala-based neural responses to an acute stressor.","authors":"Robin N Perry, Mikeala A Ethier-Gagnon, Carl Helmick, Toni C Spinella, Philip G Tibbo, Sherry H Stewart, Sean P Barrett","doi":"10.1177/02698811241287557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD) impacts brain regions implicated in anxiety reactivity and stress reactivity (e.g., amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula (AI)); however, placebo-controlled studies are mixed regarding CBD's anxiolytic effects. We previously reported that CBD expectancy alone can alter subjective, physiological, and endocrine markers of stress/anxiety; however, it is unclear whether these findings reflect altered brain reactivity. This study evaluated whether CBD expectancy independently alters amygdala resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) with the ACC and AI following acute stress.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-eight (20 females) healthy adults were randomly assigned to receive accurate or inaccurate information regarding the CBD content of a CBD-free oil administered during a single experimental session. Following a baseline resting state MRI scan, participants administered their assigned oil sublingually, engaged in a stress task (serial subtraction with negative feedback) inside the scanner, and underwent another resting state MRI scan. Amygdala rsFC with the ACC and AI was measured during each scan, and the subjective state was assessed at six time points. Outcomes were analyzed using ANCOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD expectancy (vs CBD-free expectancy) was associated with significantly weaker rsFC between the left amygdala and right ACC (<i>p</i> = 0.042), but did not systematically alter amygdala-AI rsFC (<i>p-</i>values > 0.05). We also replicated our previously reported CBD expectancy effects on subjective stress/anxiety in the scanner context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBD placebo effects may be sufficient to alter neural responses relevant to its purported anxiolytic and stress-relieving properties. Future work is needed to replicate these results and determine whether CBD expectancy and pharmacology interact to alter neural anxiety reactivity and stress reactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"935-948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241287557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) impacts brain regions implicated in anxiety reactivity and stress reactivity (e.g., amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula (AI)); however, placebo-controlled studies are mixed regarding CBD's anxiolytic effects. We previously reported that CBD expectancy alone can alter subjective, physiological, and endocrine markers of stress/anxiety; however, it is unclear whether these findings reflect altered brain reactivity. This study evaluated whether CBD expectancy independently alters amygdala resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) with the ACC and AI following acute stress.

Method: Thirty-eight (20 females) healthy adults were randomly assigned to receive accurate or inaccurate information regarding the CBD content of a CBD-free oil administered during a single experimental session. Following a baseline resting state MRI scan, participants administered their assigned oil sublingually, engaged in a stress task (serial subtraction with negative feedback) inside the scanner, and underwent another resting state MRI scan. Amygdala rsFC with the ACC and AI was measured during each scan, and the subjective state was assessed at six time points. Outcomes were analyzed using ANCOVA.

Results: CBD expectancy (vs CBD-free expectancy) was associated with significantly weaker rsFC between the left amygdala and right ACC (p = 0.042), but did not systematically alter amygdala-AI rsFC (p-values > 0.05). We also replicated our previously reported CBD expectancy effects on subjective stress/anxiety in the scanner context.

Conclusion: CBD placebo effects may be sufficient to alter neural responses relevant to its purported anxiolytic and stress-relieving properties. Future work is needed to replicate these results and determine whether CBD expectancy and pharmacology interact to alter neural anxiety reactivity and stress reactivity.

大麻二酚安慰剂对杏仁核神经对急性应激反应的影响。
背景:大麻二酚(CBD大麻二酚(CBD)会影响与焦虑反应性和应激反应性有关的脑区(如杏仁核、前扣带回皮层(ACC)、前脑岛(AI));然而,关于CBD的抗焦虑作用,安慰剂对照研究结果不一。我们以前曾报道过,单凭对 CBD 的期待就能改变压力/焦虑的主观、生理和内分泌指标;然而,目前还不清楚这些发现是否反映了大脑反应性的改变。本研究评估了CBD预期是否会独立改变急性应激后杏仁核与ACC和AI的静息状态功能连接(rsFC):38名(20名女性)健康成年人被随机分配到一个实验环节,接受关于不含 CBD 的油中 CBD 含量的准确或不准确信息。在进行基线静息状态核磁共振成像扫描后,参与者舌下含服指定的精油,在扫描仪内进行应激任务(负反馈连续减法),并再次进行静息状态核磁共振成像扫描。在每次扫描期间测量杏仁核与 ACC 和 AI 的 rsFC,并在六个时间点评估主观状态。结果采用方差分析:结果:CBD 预期(与无 CBD 预期相比)与左侧杏仁核和右侧 ACC 之间的 rsFC 明显减弱有关(p = 0.042),但并没有系统性地改变杏仁核-AI rsFC(p 值 > 0.05)。我们还在扫描仪环境中重复了之前报道的CBD对主观压力/焦虑的预期效应:结论:CBD的安慰剂效应可能足以改变与其声称的抗焦虑和缓解压力特性相关的神经反应。未来的工作需要复制这些结果,并确定 CBD 预期效应和药理学是否相互作用,从而改变神经焦虑反应性和压力反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信