Elastic and fatigue properties of additively manufactured and milled Ti-6Al-4V removable partial denture clasps.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Minrui Xu, Yan Lin, Zhenxiang Lin, Hui Cheng
{"title":"Elastic and fatigue properties of additively manufactured and milled Ti-6Al-4V removable partial denture clasps.","authors":"Minrui Xu, Yan Lin, Zhenxiang Lin, Hui Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The use of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V (AM Ti64) in removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks has become increasingly prevalent in clinical practice. However, the elastic and fatigue properties of AM Ti64 clasps are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the elastic and fatigue properties of AM Ti64 clasps by comparing them with milled Ti64 (Milled TC4) clasps.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Dumbbell specimens of AM Ti64 and Milled TC4 were prepared for tensile tests following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22674 standard (n=6). Raw (R) and mechanically polished (P) clasp-shaped specimens were prepared for elastic and fatigue tests and divided into 4 groups: AM Ti64R, AM Ti64P, Milled TC4R, and Milled TC4P. The clasp intaglio surface roughness was measured before testing (n=10). The elastic deformation limit (EDL) of the clasp was determined through incremental displacement loading (n=10). Fatigue tests were conducted on 160 clasps (40 specimens per group) at displacements from 0.30 mm to 1.00 mm for 10<sup>5</sup> cycles (n=5 per displacement). The fracture surfaces of failed clasps were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the microstructures were analyzed using optical microscopy. Statistical analyses were conducted using t tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AM Ti64 exhibited higher 0.2% offset yield strength and ultimate tensile strength than Milled TC4 (P<.001), with no significant difference in percentage elongation (P=.298) or elastic modulus (P=.151). No significant differences in intaglio surface roughness were found between AM Ti64 and Milled TC4 clasps in both the raw (P=.306) and polished (P>.999) groups. AM Ti64 clasps demonstrated greater EDL values than Milled TC4 clasps in both the raw and polished groups (P<.001). The fatigue life of AM Ti64 clasps was significantly shorter than that of Milled TC4 clasps (P<.001), with no significant difference between the raw and polished groups in both AM Ti64 (P=.611) and Milled TC4 clasps (P>.999). SEM observation revealed fatigue cracks originating from surface defects in AM Ti64 clasps. Microstructural analysis showed lamellar α phase dominance in AM Ti64, while Milled TC4 exhibited primarily equiaxed α phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AM Ti64 clasp showed better elasticity but inferior fatigue performance compared with Milled TC4 clasps. Mechanical polishing did not significantly affect the elasticity or fatigue properties of the titanium clasp.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: The use of additive manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V (AM Ti64) in removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks has become increasingly prevalent in clinical practice. However, the elastic and fatigue properties of AM Ti64 clasps are not well understood.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the elastic and fatigue properties of AM Ti64 clasps by comparing them with milled Ti64 (Milled TC4) clasps.

Material and methods: Dumbbell specimens of AM Ti64 and Milled TC4 were prepared for tensile tests following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22674 standard (n=6). Raw (R) and mechanically polished (P) clasp-shaped specimens were prepared for elastic and fatigue tests and divided into 4 groups: AM Ti64R, AM Ti64P, Milled TC4R, and Milled TC4P. The clasp intaglio surface roughness was measured before testing (n=10). The elastic deformation limit (EDL) of the clasp was determined through incremental displacement loading (n=10). Fatigue tests were conducted on 160 clasps (40 specimens per group) at displacements from 0.30 mm to 1.00 mm for 105 cycles (n=5 per displacement). The fracture surfaces of failed clasps were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and the microstructures were analyzed using optical microscopy. Statistical analyses were conducted using t tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α=.05).

Results: AM Ti64 exhibited higher 0.2% offset yield strength and ultimate tensile strength than Milled TC4 (P<.001), with no significant difference in percentage elongation (P=.298) or elastic modulus (P=.151). No significant differences in intaglio surface roughness were found between AM Ti64 and Milled TC4 clasps in both the raw (P=.306) and polished (P>.999) groups. AM Ti64 clasps demonstrated greater EDL values than Milled TC4 clasps in both the raw and polished groups (P<.001). The fatigue life of AM Ti64 clasps was significantly shorter than that of Milled TC4 clasps (P<.001), with no significant difference between the raw and polished groups in both AM Ti64 (P=.611) and Milled TC4 clasps (P>.999). SEM observation revealed fatigue cracks originating from surface defects in AM Ti64 clasps. Microstructural analysis showed lamellar α phase dominance in AM Ti64, while Milled TC4 exhibited primarily equiaxed α phase.

Conclusions: The AM Ti64 clasp showed better elasticity but inferior fatigue performance compared with Milled TC4 clasps. Mechanical polishing did not significantly affect the elasticity or fatigue properties of the titanium clasp.

加成制造和铣削 Ti-6Al-4V 可摘局部义齿卡环的弹性和疲劳特性。
问题陈述:在可摘局部义齿(RPD)框架中使用增材制造的 Ti-6Al-4V (AM Ti64) 在临床实践中越来越普遍。目的:本体外研究的目的是通过比较 AM Ti64 和铣削 Ti64(铣削 TC4)卡环,研究 AM Ti64 卡环的弹性和疲劳特性:按照国际标准化组织(ISO)22674 标准(n=6)制备了 AM Ti64 和铣削 TC4 哑铃试样,用于拉伸测试。未加工(R)和机械抛光(P)的扣形试样用于弹性和疲劳测试,并分为 4 组:AM Ti64R、AM Ti64P、铣削 TC4R 和铣削 TC4P。测试前测量了扣环凹版表面粗糙度(n=10)。表扣的弹性变形极限(EDL)是通过增量位移加载确定的(n=10)。在 0.30 毫米至 1.00 毫米的位移范围内对 160 个扣件(每组 40 个试样)进行了 105 次疲劳试验(每次位移 5 个试样)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察了失效扣的断裂面,并使用光学显微镜分析了微观结构。统计分析采用 t 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验(α=.05):AM Ti64 的 0.2% 偏移屈服强度和极限拉伸强度高于铣削 TC4 组(P.999)。在未加工组和抛光组中,AM Ti64 扣环的 EDL 值均高于铣削 TC4 扣环(P.999)。扫描电子显微镜观察发现,AM Ti64 扣件的疲劳裂纹源于表面缺陷。微观结构分析表明,AM Ti64 中以片状 α 相为主,而铣削 TC4 则主要表现为等轴 α 相:结论:与铣削 TC4 扣相比,AM Ti64 扣的弹性更好,但疲劳性能较差。机械抛光对钛扣的弹性和疲劳性能没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信