Factors associated with breastfeeding rates at 1 month of age: Focusing on newborn feeding behaviours in a Japanese maternity hospital.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Aya Tomita, Emi Tahara-Sasagawa, Kaori Yonezawa, Yuriko Usui, Megumi Haruna
{"title":"Factors associated with breastfeeding rates at 1 month of age: Focusing on newborn feeding behaviours in a Japanese maternity hospital.","authors":"Aya Tomita, Emi Tahara-Sasagawa, Kaori Yonezawa, Yuriko Usui, Megumi Haruna","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the relationship between newborn feeding behaviour and feeding type among month-old babies and explored maternal and neonatal factors associated with breastfeeding rates at 1 month of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted in Japan with healthy mothers and full-term newborns. Newborn feeding behaviours were assessed using the Japanese Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) within approximately 1 day of birth. Obstetric and newborn characteristics, including newborn feeding behaviours, were investigated in relation feeding type (breast milk or mixed milk) at 1 month of age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 176 mother-newborn pairs. IBFAT scores were significantly higher in the breast-milk group (Median (M) = 10.5, Interquartile Ranges (IQR): 9.0-11.0) than in the mixed-milk group (M = 10.0, IQR: 7.5-11.0) (P = 0.046). Additionally, the sucking pattern of breastfeeding was showing a greater distribution of higher scores in the breast-milk group (M = 2.0, IQR: 2.0-2.5) than in the mixed-milk group (M = 2.0, IQR: 1.5-2.5) (P = 0.015). Compared to mothers who received epidural analgesia or synthetic oxytocin, primiparas who did not receive them were more likely to breastfeed (epidural analgesia: (33.3% vs. 65.8%, P = 0.004); synthetic oxytocin: (42.0% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.018)). For multiparas, Apgar and IBFAT scores were associated with feeding type at 1 month of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that newborns' effective and sustained sucking within 1 day of birth is an important factor for breastfeeding at 1 month of age. When assessing feeding type, maternal factors such as epidural analgesia should be the focus for primiparas, while neonatal factors such as feeding behaviour should be prioritised for multiparas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study investigated the relationship between newborn feeding behaviour and feeding type among month-old babies and explored maternal and neonatal factors associated with breastfeeding rates at 1 month of age.

Methods: This observational study was conducted in Japan with healthy mothers and full-term newborns. Newborn feeding behaviours were assessed using the Japanese Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) within approximately 1 day of birth. Obstetric and newborn characteristics, including newborn feeding behaviours, were investigated in relation feeding type (breast milk or mixed milk) at 1 month of age.

Results: This study included 176 mother-newborn pairs. IBFAT scores were significantly higher in the breast-milk group (Median (M) = 10.5, Interquartile Ranges (IQR): 9.0-11.0) than in the mixed-milk group (M = 10.0, IQR: 7.5-11.0) (P = 0.046). Additionally, the sucking pattern of breastfeeding was showing a greater distribution of higher scores in the breast-milk group (M = 2.0, IQR: 2.0-2.5) than in the mixed-milk group (M = 2.0, IQR: 1.5-2.5) (P = 0.015). Compared to mothers who received epidural analgesia or synthetic oxytocin, primiparas who did not receive them were more likely to breastfeed (epidural analgesia: (33.3% vs. 65.8%, P = 0.004); synthetic oxytocin: (42.0% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.018)). For multiparas, Apgar and IBFAT scores were associated with feeding type at 1 month of age.

Conclusions: This study found that newborns' effective and sustained sucking within 1 day of birth is an important factor for breastfeeding at 1 month of age. When assessing feeding type, maternal factors such as epidural analgesia should be the focus for primiparas, while neonatal factors such as feeding behaviour should be prioritised for multiparas.

1 个月婴儿母乳喂养率的相关因素:聚焦日本一家妇产医院的新生儿喂养行为。
目的:本研究调查了月龄婴儿的新生儿喂养行为与喂养类型之间的关系,并探讨了与月龄婴儿母乳喂养率相关的产妇和新生儿因素:这项观察性研究在日本进行,对象为健康母亲和足月新生儿。使用日本婴儿母乳喂养评估工具(IBFAT)对出生后约 1 天内的新生儿喂养行为进行了评估。产科和新生儿特征,包括新生儿喂养行为,与 1 个月大时的喂养类型(母乳或混合奶)有关:这项研究包括 176 对母婴。母乳喂养组的 IBFAT 分数(中位数 (M) = 10.5,四分位数间距 (IQR):9.0-11.0)明显高于混合奶喂养组(中位数 = 10.0,四分位数间距 (IQR):7.5-11.0)(P = 0.046)。此外,母乳喂养组(M = 2.0,IQR:2.0-2.5)的吸吮模式得分高于混合奶组(M = 2.0,IQR:1.5-2.5)(P = 0.015)。与接受硬膜外镇痛或合成催产素的母亲相比,未接受这两种镇痛或催产素的初产妇更有可能进行母乳喂养(硬膜外镇痛:(33.3% 对 65.8%,P = 0.004);合成催产素:(42.0% 对 78.6%,P = 0.018))。对于多胎妊娠,Apgar和IBFAT评分与1月龄时的喂养类型有关:本研究发现,新生儿出生后 1 天内的有效和持续吸吮是 1 个月大时母乳喂养的重要因素。在评估喂养类型时,初产妇应重点考虑硬膜外镇痛等产妇因素,而多产妇则应优先考虑喂养行为等新生儿因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信