Application of a posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate in the treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jianan Chen, Guixiong Huang, Peirang Xue, Xiaodong Guo, Kaifang Chen, Yi Xu
{"title":"Application of a posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate in the treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures.","authors":"Jianan Chen, Guixiong Huang, Peirang Xue, Xiaodong Guo, Kaifang Chen, Yi Xu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05137-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures (PWAFs) typically require the utilization of multiple plates and intraoperative plate contouring, which are technically demanding and carry the risk of intra-articular screw penetration. A novel posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate (PAILCP) has been designed to optimize these shortcomings. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the PAILCP fixation method for the surgical management of PWAFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 48 patients with PWAFs who were treated surgically in our department between January 2018 and December 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. The 48 patients were classified into groups A (PAILCP fixation, n = 25) and B (traditional fixation, n = 23) according to different fixation methods. Fracture reduction quality, number of utilized plates, blood loss, surgical time, instrumentation time, hip function, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 PAILCPs were used in group A, while 34 mini-T plates and 29 reconstruction plates were employed in group B. Compared to the patients in group B, those in group A had significantly shorter instrumentation time (- 16 min) and surgical time (- 23 min) as well as lower blood loss (- 123 ml). However, no significant differences were observed in fracture reduction quality and hip function between the two groups. Additionally, the complication rate was slightly lower in group A (3/25 patients) than in group B (6/23); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, follow-up examination revealed no main plate breakage, miniplate displacement, screw loosening, or intra-articular screw penetration in all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical treatment of PWAFs using the PAILCP fixation method results in shorter instrumentation and surgical time and lower blood loss than the traditional fixation method. Thus, the PAILCP fixation method is a promising alternative for PWAFs management, offering enhanced surgical ease and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05137-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures (PWAFs) typically require the utilization of multiple plates and intraoperative plate contouring, which are technically demanding and carry the risk of intra-articular screw penetration. A novel posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate (PAILCP) has been designed to optimize these shortcomings. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the PAILCP fixation method for the surgical management of PWAFs.

Methods: A total of 48 patients with PWAFs who were treated surgically in our department between January 2018 and December 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. The 48 patients were classified into groups A (PAILCP fixation, n = 25) and B (traditional fixation, n = 23) according to different fixation methods. Fracture reduction quality, number of utilized plates, blood loss, surgical time, instrumentation time, hip function, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 25 PAILCPs were used in group A, while 34 mini-T plates and 29 reconstruction plates were employed in group B. Compared to the patients in group B, those in group A had significantly shorter instrumentation time (- 16 min) and surgical time (- 23 min) as well as lower blood loss (- 123 ml). However, no significant differences were observed in fracture reduction quality and hip function between the two groups. Additionally, the complication rate was slightly lower in group A (3/25 patients) than in group B (6/23); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, follow-up examination revealed no main plate breakage, miniplate displacement, screw loosening, or intra-articular screw penetration in all patients.

Conclusion: The surgical treatment of PWAFs using the PAILCP fixation method results in shorter instrumentation and surgical time and lower blood loss than the traditional fixation method. Thus, the PAILCP fixation method is a promising alternative for PWAFs management, offering enhanced surgical ease and safety.

在髋臼后壁骨折的治疗中应用后部解剖整合锁定加压钢板。
背景:髋臼后壁骨折(PWAFs)的传统固定方法通常需要使用多块钢板和术中钢板塑形,这对技术要求很高,而且存在关节内螺钉穿透的风险。一种新型后方解剖整合锁定加压钢板(PAILCP)的设计旨在优化这些缺点。本研究旨在评估PAILCP固定方法在PWAF手术治疗中的可行性和有效性:选取 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在我科接受手术治疗的 48 例 PWAFs 患者进行回顾性分析。根据不同的固定方法,将 48 例患者分为 A 组(PAILCP 固定,n = 25)和 B 组(传统固定,n = 23)。比较了两组患者的骨折还原质量、使用钢板数量、失血量、手术时间、器械时间、髋关节功能和并发症:A组共使用了25枚PAILCP,B组使用了34枚迷你T型钢板和29枚重建钢板。与B组患者相比,A组患者的固定时间(-16分钟)和手术时间(-23分钟)明显缩短,失血量(-123毫升)也明显减少。不过,两组在骨折复位质量和髋关节功能方面没有明显差异。此外,A 组(3/25 名患者)的并发症发生率略低于 B 组(6/23 名患者),但差异无统计学意义。最后,随访检查显示,所有患者均无主钢板断裂、小钢板移位、螺钉松动或关节内螺钉穿入:结论:与传统固定方法相比,使用 PAILCP 固定方法对 PWAFs 进行手术治疗,器械和手术时间更短,失血量更少。因此,PAILCP 固定法是治疗 PWAFs 的一种很有前途的替代方法,可提高手术的简便性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信