Transumbilical access for neonatal vein of Galen malformation and pial arteriovenous fistula embolization.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Maximilian Jeremy Bazil, Johanna T Fifi, Alejandro Berenstein, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu
{"title":"Transumbilical access for neonatal vein of Galen malformation and pial arteriovenous fistula embolization.","authors":"Maximilian Jeremy Bazil, Johanna T Fifi, Alejandro Berenstein, Tomoyoshi Shigematsu","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-021921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the neonatal period, transfemoral access may be complicated by sheath size needed for embolization, especially if retreatment is required. A viable alternative is access through an umbilical artery (UA) which allows for preservation of the femoral artery for access in future intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study from January 2014 to March 2023, focusing on 19 vein of Galen malformation, dural arteriovenous (AV) fistula, and pial AV fistula cases treated via transumbilical (TU) access for endovascular embolization in neonates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TU access was achieved successfully in 20 out of 21 intended cases, with a 4 French sheath placed intraprocedurally in all instances. We observed a median retreatment time of 7 months for patients requiring subsequent femoral artery access, highlighting the importance of preserving femoral access for future interventions. There were no complications associated with TU access or sheath retention and no procedural mortality attributed to this approach. Despite intraprocedural and periprocedural complications of other etiologies (including post-procedural hemorrhages and fever requiring antibiotic treatment), the TU approach demonstrated overall safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings align with previous reports of TU access in vascular malformations, emphasizing its role as a vital technique in neonatal neurointervention. The TU approach offers advantages such as sparing femoral arteries for future treatments and potential applicability to other high-flow brain fistulas. Our study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of TU access in neonatal neuroendovascular interventions, underscoring its importance in managing complex vascular malformations in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-021921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the neonatal period, transfemoral access may be complicated by sheath size needed for embolization, especially if retreatment is required. A viable alternative is access through an umbilical artery (UA) which allows for preservation of the femoral artery for access in future intervention.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2014 to March 2023, focusing on 19 vein of Galen malformation, dural arteriovenous (AV) fistula, and pial AV fistula cases treated via transumbilical (TU) access for endovascular embolization in neonates.

Results: TU access was achieved successfully in 20 out of 21 intended cases, with a 4 French sheath placed intraprocedurally in all instances. We observed a median retreatment time of 7 months for patients requiring subsequent femoral artery access, highlighting the importance of preserving femoral access for future interventions. There were no complications associated with TU access or sheath retention and no procedural mortality attributed to this approach. Despite intraprocedural and periprocedural complications of other etiologies (including post-procedural hemorrhages and fever requiring antibiotic treatment), the TU approach demonstrated overall safety and efficacy.

Conclusions: Our findings align with previous reports of TU access in vascular malformations, emphasizing its role as a vital technique in neonatal neurointervention. The TU approach offers advantages such as sparing femoral arteries for future treatments and potential applicability to other high-flow brain fistulas. Our study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of TU access in neonatal neuroendovascular interventions, underscoring its importance in managing complex vascular malformations in this vulnerable population.

新生儿盖伦静脉畸形和静脉动静脉瘘栓塞术的经脐入路。
背景:在新生儿期,经股动脉入路可能会因栓塞所需的鞘管尺寸而变得复杂,尤其是在需要再次治疗的情况下。一个可行的替代方法是通过脐动脉(UA)入路,这样可以保留股动脉,以便将来进行介入治疗时使用:方法:我们从 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月进行了一项回顾性研究,重点研究了 19 例通过经脐(TU)入路进行血管内栓塞治疗的新生儿 Galen 静脉畸形、硬脑膜动静脉(AV)瘘和桡侧 AV 瘘病例:结果:21 例预定病例中有 20 例成功实现了经脐部入路,所有病例均在术中放置了 4 French 插鞘。我们观察到,需要后续股动脉通路的患者的中位再治疗时间为 7 个月,这凸显了保留股动脉通路对未来介入治疗的重要性。这种方法没有出现与TU入路或鞘滞留相关的并发症,也没有造成手术死亡率。尽管术中和围术期出现了其他病因引起的并发症(包括术后出血和需要抗生素治疗的发热),但TU方法显示出了整体的安全性和有效性:我们的研究结果与之前关于血管畸形 TU 入路的报道一致,强调了其作为新生儿神经介入重要技术的作用。TU方法的优势在于为将来的治疗保留了股动脉,并有可能适用于其他高流量脑瘘管。我们的研究为越来越多的证据支持在新生儿神经内血管介入中使用TU入路做出了贡献,强调了它在处理这一脆弱人群复杂血管畸形中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信