{"title":"Detection of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli in Japan using the fully automated bacterial testing device RAISUS S4.","authors":"Yumiko Funashima, Rin Hamabe, Kei Tominaga, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Takahiro Yaguchi, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated a rapid detection method for carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli (CP-GNR) using meropenem (MEPM) to assess the efficiency of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the function that can monitor the growth curve with the resistant bacteria monitoring function (RAISUS S4). Rapid detection of CP-GNR was performed using RAISUS S4 in two types of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the RAISUS 18-hour method (18-h method) and RAISUS rapid method (rapid method) for Enterobacterales (F-GNR) and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When F-GNR were based on MEPM MIC ≥ 0.25 μg/mL, CP-GNR were detected with a sensitivity of 100% (58/58) for the 18-h method and 98.3% (57/58) for the rapid method; the shortest detection times were 5.3 and 4.0 h, respectively. When NF-GNR were based on MEPM MIC > 8 μg/mL, it was possible to detect CP-GNR with 100% sensitivity (58/58) in both methods. Furthermore, in the analysis using the 18-h method for monitoring resistant bacteria, when ≥ 2 µg/mL was used as the screening concentration for F-GNR, approximately 50% of the resistant genotypes, NDM, GES, and KPC, were detected in approximately 7 h. However, detecting the IMP and VIM took 11-12 h.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 18-h and rapid methods with RAISUS S4 were highly correlated with the results of the microdilution method of CLSI, and CP-GNR detection was rapid using a function that can monitor the growth curve with RAISUS S4.</p>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2024.09.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We investigated a rapid detection method for carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli (CP-GNR) using meropenem (MEPM) to assess the efficiency of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Methods: We used the function that can monitor the growth curve with the resistant bacteria monitoring function (RAISUS S4). Rapid detection of CP-GNR was performed using RAISUS S4 in two types of antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the RAISUS 18-hour method (18-h method) and RAISUS rapid method (rapid method) for Enterobacterales (F-GNR) and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNR).
Results: When F-GNR were based on MEPM MIC ≥ 0.25 μg/mL, CP-GNR were detected with a sensitivity of 100% (58/58) for the 18-h method and 98.3% (57/58) for the rapid method; the shortest detection times were 5.3 and 4.0 h, respectively. When NF-GNR were based on MEPM MIC > 8 μg/mL, it was possible to detect CP-GNR with 100% sensitivity (58/58) in both methods. Furthermore, in the analysis using the 18-h method for monitoring resistant bacteria, when ≥ 2 µg/mL was used as the screening concentration for F-GNR, approximately 50% of the resistant genotypes, NDM, GES, and KPC, were detected in approximately 7 h. However, detecting the IMP and VIM took 11-12 h.
Conclusions: The 18-h and rapid methods with RAISUS S4 were highly correlated with the results of the microdilution method of CLSI, and CP-GNR detection was rapid using a function that can monitor the growth curve with RAISUS S4.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes.
JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.