Efficacy of allogenic bone block graft in maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction: A systematic review.

Q2 Dentistry
Aishwarya Ramkishan Purohit, Rajashri Abhay Kolte, Abhay Pandurang Kolte, Vrushali Nilesh Lathiya
{"title":"Efficacy of allogenic bone block graft in maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction: A systematic review.","authors":"Aishwarya Ramkishan Purohit, Rajashri Abhay Kolte, Abhay Pandurang Kolte, Vrushali Nilesh Lathiya","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_337_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficiency of allogenic bone block grafts for maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. In addition, manual searching was done. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical trials (non-RCTs) up to December 2022, presenting the outcomes of allogenic bone blocks in maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction, were identified. The rate of resorption, survival rate of implants, and formation of new bone following ridge augmentation were the outcome parameters. The quality assessment of the studies included was done using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 studies that matched the inclusion criteria were included. The average rate of bone resorption ranged from 0.2 to 29.2 mm, with an implant survival rate of 96.87% across the included investigations. On an average, 25.83 mm (18.6-33/mm) of new mature compact osseous tissue was discovered, including viable osteocytes in close contact with the remnant cancellous bone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results of the current systematic review, using allogenic bone block graft for reconstruction of atrophic maxillae appears to be an effective and reliable bone substitute for reconstruction of atrophic maxillae.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"28 2","pages":"176-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_337_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficiency of allogenic bone block grafts for maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction.

Materials and methods: An electronic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. In addition, manual searching was done. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical trials (non-RCTs) up to December 2022, presenting the outcomes of allogenic bone blocks in maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction, were identified. The rate of resorption, survival rate of implants, and formation of new bone following ridge augmentation were the outcome parameters. The quality assessment of the studies included was done using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.

Results: A total of 13 studies that matched the inclusion criteria were included. The average rate of bone resorption ranged from 0.2 to 29.2 mm, with an implant survival rate of 96.87% across the included investigations. On an average, 25.83 mm (18.6-33/mm) of new mature compact osseous tissue was discovered, including viable osteocytes in close contact with the remnant cancellous bone.

Conclusion: According to the results of the current systematic review, using allogenic bone block graft for reconstruction of atrophic maxillae appears to be an effective and reliable bone substitute for reconstruction of atrophic maxillae.

上颌骨牙槽嵴重建中异体骨块移植的疗效:系统综述。
背景:本系统性综述旨在评估异体骨块移植用于上颌牙槽嵴重建的效率:使用 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行电子文献检索。此外,还进行了人工检索。结果发现,截至 2022 年 12 月的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性临床试验(非 RCT)介绍了异体骨块在上颌骨牙槽嵴重建中的效果。结果参数包括牙槽嵴增高后的吸收率、种植体存活率和新骨形成率。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具对纳入的研究进行了质量评估:结果:共纳入了 13 项符合纳入标准的研究。骨吸收的平均速率从 0.2 毫米到 29.2 毫米不等,纳入研究的种植体存活率为 96.87%。平均而言,发现了 25.83 毫米(18.6-33/毫米)新的成熟紧密骨组织,包括与残余松质骨紧密接触的有活力的骨细胞:根据目前的系统综述结果,使用异体骨块移植重建萎缩上颌骨似乎是一种重建萎缩上颌骨的有效、可靠的骨替代物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信