Assessment of peri-implant tissues in posterior implants placed using flapless approach: A clinicoradiographic study.

Q2 Dentistry
Pranjali Vijaykumar Bawankar, Abhay Pandurang Kolte, Rajashri Abhay Kolte
{"title":"Assessment of peri-implant tissues in posterior implants placed using flapless approach: A clinicoradiographic study.","authors":"Pranjali Vijaykumar Bawankar, Abhay Pandurang Kolte, Rajashri Abhay Kolte","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_457_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to prognosticate the hard- and soft-tissue alterations in immediate and delayed implants, as inadequacy can lead to complications affecting the long-term survival of the implant. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the hard- and soft-tissue changes in immediate and delayed posterior implants with a flapless approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>With an equal allocation ratio, the study included 46 patients requiring implant treatment in the posterior segment, including the premolars and molars. Group 1 consisted of patients with immediate implants, whereas Group 2 consisted of patients who received delayed implants. The clinical parameters, including plaque index (PI), gingival index, modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth, and soft-tissue assessment using the Testori esthetic score (TS), were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Hard-tissue parameters, such as buccal bone thickness (BBT), crestal bone height (CBH), and ridge width, were evaluated radiographically with cone-beam computed tomography at baseline and 12 months posttherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intragroup comparisons in both the groups showed significant differences in PI, probing pocket depth, and TS over time (<i>P</i> = 0.00). The mean BBT at the crest in delayed implants (1.76 ± 0.24) significantly reduced after 12 months compared to immediate implants. A significantly higher TS score was observed after 12 months in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant difference in TS scores after 12 months was found between the two groups, with better esthetics in Group 1 compared to Group 2. However, no significant changes in BBT or CBH were observed after 12 months in Group 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"28 2","pages":"197-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_457_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is important to prognosticate the hard- and soft-tissue alterations in immediate and delayed implants, as inadequacy can lead to complications affecting the long-term survival of the implant. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the hard- and soft-tissue changes in immediate and delayed posterior implants with a flapless approach.

Materials and methods: With an equal allocation ratio, the study included 46 patients requiring implant treatment in the posterior segment, including the premolars and molars. Group 1 consisted of patients with immediate implants, whereas Group 2 consisted of patients who received delayed implants. The clinical parameters, including plaque index (PI), gingival index, modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth, and soft-tissue assessment using the Testori esthetic score (TS), were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Hard-tissue parameters, such as buccal bone thickness (BBT), crestal bone height (CBH), and ridge width, were evaluated radiographically with cone-beam computed tomography at baseline and 12 months posttherapy.

Results: Intragroup comparisons in both the groups showed significant differences in PI, probing pocket depth, and TS over time (P = 0.00). The mean BBT at the crest in delayed implants (1.76 ± 0.24) significantly reduced after 12 months compared to immediate implants. A significantly higher TS score was observed after 12 months in both the groups.

Conclusion: A significant difference in TS scores after 12 months was found between the two groups, with better esthetics in Group 1 compared to Group 2. However, no significant changes in BBT or CBH were observed after 12 months in Group 1.

采用无瓣法植入后牙种植体的种植体周围组织评估:临床放射学研究
背景:对即刻种植体和延迟种植体的硬组织和软组织变化进行预估非常重要,因为预估不足会导致并发症,影响种植体的长期存活。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较采用无瓣方法的即刻种植体和延迟后种植体的硬组织和软组织变化:研究对象包括 46 名需要在后部(包括前磨牙和磨牙)进行种植治疗的患者。第一组为即刻种植的患者,第二组为延迟种植的患者。在基线、3、6、9 和 12 个月时对临床参数进行评估,包括牙菌斑指数 (PI)、牙龈指数、改良龈沟出血指数、探诊深度以及使用 Testori 美学评分 (TS) 进行的软组织评估。硬组织参数,如颊骨厚度(BBT)、嵴骨高度(CBH)和嵴宽度,则在基线和治疗后 12 个月用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行放射学评估:结果:两组患者的组内比较显示,随着时间的推移,PI、探诊袋深度和 TS 均有显著差异(P = 0.00)。与即刻种植体相比,延迟种植体嵴上的平均 BBT(1.76 ± 0.24)在 12 个月后明显降低。12个月后,两组的TS评分均明显升高:结论:两组 12 个月后的 TS 评分有明显差异,第一组的美学效果优于第二组。 然而,第一组 12 个月后的 BBT 或 CBH 均无明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信