Calibrating sweat chloride levels to CFTR activity via ETI effects on CF subjects with one or two F508DEL mutations.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jeffrey J Wine
{"title":"Calibrating sweat chloride levels to CFTR activity via ETI effects on CF subjects with one or two F508DEL mutations.","authors":"Jeffrey J Wine","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is difficult to determine CFTR activity following highly effective CFTR modulator therapies (HEMT). The sweat gland provides two biomarkers of CFTR activity: a linear readout via the β-sweat rate and a logarithmic readout via sweat chloride concentration (SCC). In prior work, different logarithmic functions were generated to calibrate SCC with the percent of healthy control CFTR activity (HCCFTR). Two functions, A and B, were fit to SCC means from healthy controls set = 100 % and CF carriers measured as 50 % HCCFTR. A and B differ in the % HCCFTR activity assigned to SCC for minimal function mutations = 0.01 % for A and 1 % for B.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, the functions are evaluated based on retrospective analysis of three multi-center studies of CF subjects with one or two F508del mutations treated with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI). Predictions of the percent HCCFTR activity for one vs two mutations were compared for the two functions. The expectation is that after ETI treatment, subjects with two responsive mutations will have 2-fold higher HCCFTR activity than subjects with only one. The hypothesis is that the SCCHCCFTR function that most closely fits that expectation provides the more accurate prediction of CFTR activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In two separate comparisons, function B most accurately predicted a 2-fold (1.9, 2.3-fold) higher level of HCCFTR activity in subjects on ETI with two vs. one responsive mutation. Function A predicted a 4, 5.5-fold higher level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Function B predicts that 60 mmol/L SCC, the cutoff for a CF diagnosis, is associated with 10 % HCCFTR activity. Comparing HEMT effects on subjects with one or two mutations provides an additional tool for calibrating SCC to CFTR activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2024.09.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is difficult to determine CFTR activity following highly effective CFTR modulator therapies (HEMT). The sweat gland provides two biomarkers of CFTR activity: a linear readout via the β-sweat rate and a logarithmic readout via sweat chloride concentration (SCC). In prior work, different logarithmic functions were generated to calibrate SCC with the percent of healthy control CFTR activity (HCCFTR). Two functions, A and B, were fit to SCC means from healthy controls set = 100 % and CF carriers measured as 50 % HCCFTR. A and B differ in the % HCCFTR activity assigned to SCC for minimal function mutations = 0.01 % for A and 1 % for B.

Methods: Here, the functions are evaluated based on retrospective analysis of three multi-center studies of CF subjects with one or two F508del mutations treated with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI). Predictions of the percent HCCFTR activity for one vs two mutations were compared for the two functions. The expectation is that after ETI treatment, subjects with two responsive mutations will have 2-fold higher HCCFTR activity than subjects with only one. The hypothesis is that the SCCHCCFTR function that most closely fits that expectation provides the more accurate prediction of CFTR activity.

Results: In two separate comparisons, function B most accurately predicted a 2-fold (1.9, 2.3-fold) higher level of HCCFTR activity in subjects on ETI with two vs. one responsive mutation. Function A predicted a 4, 5.5-fold higher level.

Conclusions: Function B predicts that 60 mmol/L SCC, the cutoff for a CF diagnosis, is associated with 10 % HCCFTR activity. Comparing HEMT effects on subjects with one or two mutations provides an additional tool for calibrating SCC to CFTR activity.

通过 ETI 对有一个或两个 F508DEL 突变的 CF 受试者的影响,校准汗液氯化物水平和 CFTR 活性。
背景:在使用高效 CFTR 调节剂疗法 (HEMT) 后,很难确定 CFTR 的活性。汗腺提供了两种 CFTR 活性的生物标志物:通过 β-出汗率的线性读数和通过汗液氯化物浓度 (SCC) 的对数读数。在之前的工作中,产生了不同的对数函数来校准 SCC 与健康对照 CFTR 活性(HCCFTR)的百分比。健康对照组的 SCC 平均值设定为 100%,而 CF 携带者的 HCCFTR 测量值为 50%。A和B的不同之处在于,最小功能突变的SCC的HCCFTR活性百分比=0.01%(A)和1%(B)。方法:本文根据对使用Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor(ETI)治疗有一个或两个F508del突变的CF受试者的三项多中心研究的回顾性分析,对这两个函数进行了评估。对两种功能中一个突变与两个突变的 HCCFTR 活性百分比的预测进行了比较。预计经过 ETI 治疗后,有两个反应性突变的受试者的 HCCFTR 活性将比只有一个突变的受试者高出 2 倍。假设最符合这一预期的 SCCHCCFTR 功能能更准确地预测 CFTR 活性:结果:在两个单独的比较中,功能 B 最准确地预测了有两个与一个响应突变的 ETI 受试者的 HCCFTR 活性水平高出 2 倍(1.9 倍,2.3 倍)。功能 A 预测的水平分别高出 4 倍和 5.5 倍:功能 B 预测,60 mmol/L SCC(CF 诊断的临界值)与 10% HCCFTR 活性相关。比较 HEMT 对具有一个或两个突变的受试者的影响为校准 SCC 和 CFTR 活性提供了额外的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信