Cognitive reserve in individuals with frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lauren A Grebe, Jet M J Vonk, Elizabeth E Galletta, Mira Goral
{"title":"Cognitive reserve in individuals with frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review.","authors":"Lauren A Grebe, Jet M J Vonk, Elizabeth E Galletta, Mira Goral","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2410207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the literature related to cognitive reserve (CR) in individuals with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is only emerging, a clear consensus on the relationship among CR proxies, brain status, and clinical performance has not been reached. The primary aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship among sociobehavioral proxies of CR, brain status, and clinical performance in individuals with various types of FTD. Additionally, characteristics of patient population, sociobehavioral proxies, disease severity tools, and brain status measures used were identified. The systematic review was conducted using comprehensive search terms in Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were for studies to include at least one CR and one brain status measure for individuals with FTD, be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and be published in English. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess study quality and bias risk. A total of 237 titles and abstracts were screened, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Together, these studies report 1,423 participants with FTD. Based on the included studies, partial support was demonstrated for CR in individuals with FTD when education, occupation, and leisure were utilized as CR proxies. The variability in results among studies could be related to the different tools used to measure CR, brain status, and disease severity. This review provides recommendations for future studies: incorporating longitudinal designs, in depth neuropsychological testing, consistent disease duration measure, and transparant statistical output reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2410207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the literature related to cognitive reserve (CR) in individuals with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is only emerging, a clear consensus on the relationship among CR proxies, brain status, and clinical performance has not been reached. The primary aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship among sociobehavioral proxies of CR, brain status, and clinical performance in individuals with various types of FTD. Additionally, characteristics of patient population, sociobehavioral proxies, disease severity tools, and brain status measures used were identified. The systematic review was conducted using comprehensive search terms in Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were for studies to include at least one CR and one brain status measure for individuals with FTD, be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and be published in English. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess study quality and bias risk. A total of 237 titles and abstracts were screened, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Together, these studies report 1,423 participants with FTD. Based on the included studies, partial support was demonstrated for CR in individuals with FTD when education, occupation, and leisure were utilized as CR proxies. The variability in results among studies could be related to the different tools used to measure CR, brain status, and disease severity. This review provides recommendations for future studies: incorporating longitudinal designs, in depth neuropsychological testing, consistent disease duration measure, and transparant statistical output reporting.

额颞叶痴呆症患者的认知储备:系统综述。
由于与额颞叶痴呆症(FTD)患者认知储备(CR)相关的文献才刚刚出现,关于认知储备替代物、大脑状态和临床表现之间的关系尚未达成明确的共识。本系统综述的主要目的是研究各种类型 FTD 患者的 CR 社会行为代用指标、大脑状态和临床表现之间的关系。此外,还确定了所使用的患者人群特征、社会行为代用指标、疾病严重程度工具和脑状态测量方法。该系统性综述使用了 Medline、PsychINFO、PubMed 和 Web of Science 中的综合检索词。研究的资格标准为:至少包含一项CR和一项针对FTD患者的脑状态测量,发表在同行评审期刊上,并以英语发表。纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表用于评估研究质量和偏倚风险。共筛选出 237 篇标题和摘要,其中 13 篇研究符合纳入标准。这些研究共报告了 1,423 名 FTD 患者。根据纳入的研究结果,如果将教育、职业和休闲作为 CR 的替代指标,则部分支持 FTD 患者的 CR。不同研究结果之间的差异可能与用于测量 CR、大脑状态和疾病严重程度的不同工具有关。本综述为今后的研究提供了建议:纳入纵向设计、深入的神经心理学测试、一致的疾病持续时间测量方法以及透明的统计结果报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信