{"title":"Myocardial mechanical function measured by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with heart failure.","authors":"Yufan Gao, Boxin Li, Yanhe Ma, Shuo Liang, Anhong Yu, Hong Zhang, Zhigang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Strain analysis offers a valuable tool to assess myocardial mechanics, allowing for the detection of impairments in heart function. This study aims to evaluate the pattern of myocardial strain in patients with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, myocardial strain was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking in 35 control subjects without HF and 195 HF patients. The HF patients were further categorized as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n=80), with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n=34), and with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n=81). Additionally, quantitative tissue evaluation parameters, including native T1 relaxation time and extracellular volume (ECV), were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, patients in all HF groups (HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF) demonstrated impaired left ventricular (LV) strains and systolic and diastolic strain rates in all three directions (radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) (p < 0.05 for all). LV strains also showed significant correlations with left ventricular ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide levels (p < 0.001 for all). Notably, septal contraction was significantly affected in HFpEF compared to controls. While LV torsion was slightly increased in HFpEF, it was decreased in HFrEF. Native T1 relaxation times and ECV fractions were significantly higher in HFrEF compared to HFpEF (p < 0.05). Overall, myocardial strain parameters demonstrated good performance in differentiating HF categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The myocardial strain impairments exhibit a spectrum of severity in patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF compared to controls. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using strain analysis may offer a clinically useful tool for monitoring the progression of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in HF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Strain analysis offers a valuable tool to assess myocardial mechanics, allowing for the detection of impairments in heart function. This study aims to evaluate the pattern of myocardial strain in patients with heart failure (HF).
Methods: In the present study, myocardial strain was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking in 35 control subjects without HF and 195 HF patients. The HF patients were further categorized as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n=80), with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n=34), and with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n=81). Additionally, quantitative tissue evaluation parameters, including native T1 relaxation time and extracellular volume (ECV), were examined.
Results: Compared to controls, patients in all HF groups (HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF) demonstrated impaired left ventricular (LV) strains and systolic and diastolic strain rates in all three directions (radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) (p < 0.05 for all). LV strains also showed significant correlations with left ventricular ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide levels (p < 0.001 for all). Notably, septal contraction was significantly affected in HFpEF compared to controls. While LV torsion was slightly increased in HFpEF, it was decreased in HFrEF. Native T1 relaxation times and ECV fractions were significantly higher in HFrEF compared to HFpEF (p < 0.05). Overall, myocardial strain parameters demonstrated good performance in differentiating HF categories.
Conclusions: The myocardial strain impairments exhibit a spectrum of severity in patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF compared to controls. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using strain analysis may offer a clinically useful tool for monitoring the progression of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in HF patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.