Virtual Follow-Up after Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Angelica Hanna, Diana Lucia Martinez, Marko Popovic, Iqbal Ike K Ahmed, Joshua Teichman
{"title":"Virtual Follow-Up after Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Angelica Hanna, Diana Lucia Martinez, Marko Popovic, Iqbal Ike K Ahmed, Joshua Teichman","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To examine the association between virtual postoperative follow-up care and patient outcomes after cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Cataract surgery is a safe and commonly performed surgery. Follow-up visits are used to monitor for complications. It is uncertain whether virtual follow-up provides a safe alternative to in-person review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to October 2023 for relevant articles containing original data. Studies that: 1) included patients that were seen in a virtual follow-up (i.e., telephone or video call) for postoperative appointments after cataract surgery, and 2) reported patient outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and ROB2 assessment tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. The review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number, CRD42023477207) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 1710 records with seven studies included in this review. The seven studies reported on 2113 cataract surgeries in 1994 patients. The studies ranged between 2004 and 2020. Most of the studies (5/7) included only patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery. Virtual follow-ups were all conducted by telephone. The follow-up calls were made at varying timepoints including postoperative day 1 (n= 3), day 7 (n=2) and day 14 (n=1). Two observational studies directly compared patients who had a telephone follow-up to a control group who had an in-person follow-up. There were no significant differences in complication rates (p=0.22) or visual acuity (p=0.28) between these follow-up groups. None of the studies reported serious adverse outcomes from replacing in-person follow-up with telephone follow-up. One study used virtual follow-up in conjunction with in-person visits for elderly patients and found that additional telephone follow-up was associated with decreased surgical recovery time and decreased patient anxiety. Three studies reported on patient perceptions about telephone follow-up. A common theme was that patients preferred telephone reviews and found them to be more convenient than in-person follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery, virtual follow-ups seem to be a safe alternative to in-person visits and were preferred by patients. These conclusions are preliminary given the limited literature base, and further study is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topic: To examine the association between virtual postoperative follow-up care and patient outcomes after cataract surgery.

Clinical relevance: Cataract surgery is a safe and commonly performed surgery. Follow-up visits are used to monitor for complications. It is uncertain whether virtual follow-up provides a safe alternative to in-person review.

Methods: Medline, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to October 2023 for relevant articles containing original data. Studies that: 1) included patients that were seen in a virtual follow-up (i.e., telephone or video call) for postoperative appointments after cataract surgery, and 2) reported patient outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and ROB2 assessment tools. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. The review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number, CRD42023477207) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Results: The search yielded 1710 records with seven studies included in this review. The seven studies reported on 2113 cataract surgeries in 1994 patients. The studies ranged between 2004 and 2020. Most of the studies (5/7) included only patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery. Virtual follow-ups were all conducted by telephone. The follow-up calls were made at varying timepoints including postoperative day 1 (n= 3), day 7 (n=2) and day 14 (n=1). Two observational studies directly compared patients who had a telephone follow-up to a control group who had an in-person follow-up. There were no significant differences in complication rates (p=0.22) or visual acuity (p=0.28) between these follow-up groups. None of the studies reported serious adverse outcomes from replacing in-person follow-up with telephone follow-up. One study used virtual follow-up in conjunction with in-person visits for elderly patients and found that additional telephone follow-up was associated with decreased surgical recovery time and decreased patient anxiety. Three studies reported on patient perceptions about telephone follow-up. A common theme was that patients preferred telephone reviews and found them to be more convenient than in-person follow-up.

Conclusions: For patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery, virtual follow-ups seem to be a safe alternative to in-person visits and were preferred by patients. These conclusions are preliminary given the limited literature base, and further study is needed.

白内障手术后的虚拟随访:系统回顾
主题研究白内障手术后虚拟随访护理与患者预后之间的关系:白内障手术是一种安全且常见的手术。随访用于监测并发症。目前还不确定虚拟随访是否能安全地替代亲自复查:方法:检索 Medline、Embase 和 CINAHL 中从开始到 2023 年 10 月包含原始数据的相关文章。符合以下条件的研究1) 包括白内障手术后通过虚拟随访(即电话或视频通话)进行术后复查的患者,以及 2) 报告患者结果的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华和 ROB2 评估工具对偏倚风险进行评估。采用描述性统计来总结研究结果。该综述已在 PROSPERO 注册(注册号为 CRD42023477207),并遵循了 PRISMA 指南:结果:搜索共获得 1710 条记录,其中七项研究被纳入本综述。这七项研究报告了 1994 名患者的 2113 例白内障手术。研究时间跨度为 2004 年至 2020 年。大多数研究(5/7)只纳入了无并发症的白内障手术患者。虚拟随访均通过电话进行。随访电话的时间点各不相同,包括术后第 1 天(3 例)、第 7 天(2 例)和第 14 天(1 例)。有两项观察性研究直接将接受电话随访的患者与接受现场随访的对照组进行了比较。这些随访组在并发症发生率(P=0.22)或视力(P=0.28)方面没有明显差异。没有一项研究报告称电话随访取代面对面随访会产生严重的不良后果。一项研究在对老年患者进行亲临现场随访的同时使用了虚拟随访,结果发现额外的电话随访与手术恢复时间缩短和患者焦虑减少有关。三项研究报告了患者对电话随访的看法。一个共同的主题是,患者更喜欢电话复查,并认为电话复查比面对面随访更方便:结论:对于不复杂的白内障手术患者来说,虚拟随访似乎是一种安全的方式,可以替代面对面随访,而且患者更喜欢虚拟随访。由于文献基础有限,这些结论还只是初步的,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信